Assessment of Pedagogical Approaches by Criminology Faculty: A Basis for Professional Intervention

This study investigated the pedagogical approaches employed by criminology faculty members in higher education institutions across Cebu Province, Philippines, focusing on the implementation and effectiveness of these methods. As the criminology profession undergoes significant transformation, the adoption of sophisticated teaching strategies is essential to cultivate critical thinking and meet contemporary professional standards. Utilizing a quantitative, descriptive-correlational research design, the study systematically evaluated the implementation of learning objectives, faculty content knowledge, teaching strategies, instructional materials, and assessment techniques. The findings demonstrated that while faculty members possess a strong foundation in establishing clear learning objectives and exhibit a commendable mastery of their subject matter, significant pedagogical challenges persist. Specifically, the data revealed critical gaps in curriculum alignment and student engagement. Notably, the study established a significant positive correlation between the level of implementation and the perceived effectiveness of teaching strategies, confirming that the quality of instructional delivery is a primary driver of student outcomes. To address these challenges, the research proposes a framework for ongoing professional development and the strategic integration of educational technology. By advocating for a shift from traditional, lecture-based models toward more dynamic, studentcentered strategies—such as project-based learning and flipped classrooms—this study provides actionable insights for improving educational practices. Ultimately, the research emphasizes that pedagogical reform is necessary to bridge the gap between academic instruction and the complex, real-world demands facing future criminologists.

Criminology Education, Pedagogical Approaches, Descriptive-Correlational Research, ProjectBased Learning, Flipped Classroom.

1. Alcantara, M. (2022). Assessing the effectiveness of experiential learning in Philippine criminology programs. *Philippine Journal of Criminology*, 15(2), 45-58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Barberet, R. (2007). The Internationalization of Criminology? A Content Analysis of Presentations at American Society of Criminology Conferences. In R. Barberet, Journal of Criminal Justice Education (Vol. 18, Issue 3, p. 406). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511250701705362 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bautista, J. (2021). The use of technology in Philippine criminology education. *Asian Journal of Criminology*, 17(1), 39-52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bruner, J. S. (2020). **Constructivist theory in education.** In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), *The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences* (2nd ed., pp. 35-52). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108556630.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Clark, A. Y., Li, Y., & Jiang, Y. (2018). Using Natural Language Processing and Qualitative Thematic Coding to Explore Math Learning and Critical Thinking (By A. Y. Clark, Y. Li, & Y. Jiang; Vol. 30, p. 38). https://doi.org/10.1145/3206157.3206178 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. De la Cruz, R. (2023). Challenges faced by criminology faculty in the Philippines. *Journal of Criminology Education*, 9(1), 12-24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Duffy, T. M., & Cunningham, D. J. (2018). **Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction.** In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), *Handbook of research for educational communications and technology* (pp. 170-198). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315142012-23 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Friday, P. C. (1996). The need to integrate comparative and international criminal justice into a traditional curriculum. In P. C. Friday, Journal of Criminal Justice Education (Vol. 7, Issue 2, p. 227). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511259600096081 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Gonzales, P. (2022). Assessment practices in Philippine criminology programs. *Philippine Criminology Review*, 10(3), 100-115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hippchen, L. J. (1981). Importance of Teaching The International Aspects of Criminal Justice. In L. J. Hippchen, International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice (Vol. 5, Issue 2, p. 221). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.1981.9688733 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2018). **Facilitating collaborative learning.** In M. M. L. L. Y. L. Z. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. A. S. Marina (Ed.), *Collaborative learning: A sourcebook for higher education* (pp. 233-246).ThePennsylvania State University. \ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kloosterman, A., Mapes, A., Geradts, Z., van Eijk, E., Koper, C., van den Berg, J., ... & van Asten, A. (2015). The interface between forensic science and technology: how technology could cause a paradigm shift in the role of forensic institutes in the criminal justice system. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 370(1674), 20140264. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Leiber, M. J., Crew, B. K., Wacker, M. E., & Nalla, M. K. (1993). A comparison of transfer and nontransfer students majoring in criminology and criminal justice. In M. J. Leiber, B. K. Crew, M. E. Wacker, & M. K. Nalla, Journal of Criminal Justice Education (Vol. 4, Issue 1, p. 133). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511259300082811. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Levy, B. L., Thomas, E. E., Drago, K., & Rex, L. A. (2013). Examining studies of inquiry-based learning in three fields of education: Sparking generative conversation. Journal of teacher education, 64(5), 387408. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Lina, S. (2023). Faculty development needs in criminology. *International Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice*, 19(1), 8-19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Loso, M. M. (2022). Prospective Teachers’ Inclinations for Technology and Livelihood Education Degree Program. In M. M. Loso, European Journal of Education and Pedagogy (Vol. 3, Issue 5, p. 1). https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2022.3.5.427 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Marquez, L. P., Olivar, M. V. V., Brijuega, C. E., Ombao, R. P., Cerio, W. C., & Baes, F. D. (2020). Education and COVID-19: Experiences and insights from a developing country. In L. P. Marquez, M. V. V. Olivar, C. E. Brijuega, R. P. Ombao, W. C. Cerio, & F. D. Baes, ACCESS Contemporary Issues in Education (Vol. 40, Issue 1, p. 84). https://doi.org/10.46786/ac20.5188. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Martin, J., & Hanrahan, K. (2004). Criminology freshmen: Preparation, expectations, and college performance. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. In J. Martin & K. Hanrahan, Journal of Criminal Justice Education (Vol. 15, Issue 2, p. 287). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511250400085991 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Martin, T. (2023). The influence of institutional factors on pedagogical approaches in criminology. *Journal of Criminal Justice Education*, 30(2), 220-235. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. McMahon, M. (2019). **Constructivism: The learning theory of the future?** *Educational Psychology Review, 31*(3), 623-638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09448-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Ocampo, D. (2022). Career readiness of Philippine criminology graduates. *Criminology Research Journal*, 8(4), 302-315. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Partington, A. (2020, October). Personalised learning for the student-consumer. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 5, p. 529628). Frontiers Media SA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Portillo, S., Rudes, D. S., Sloas, L. B., Hutzell, K. L., & Salamoun, P. (2012). Students as Scholars: Integrating Independent Research into Undergraduate Education. In S. Portillo, D. S. Rudes, L. B. Sloas, K. L. Hutzell, & P. Salamoun, Journal of Criminal Justice Education (Vol. 24, Issue 1, p. 68). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2012.655750 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Rojas, E. (2023). Students' perceptions of effective teaching in Philippine criminology. *Philippine Journal of Education and Learning*, 6(1), 60-75. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Salinas, M. F. (2021). **Culture and innovation in classroom learning.** *Educational Studies, 57*(5), 508524. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1866752 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Santos, A. (2023). The impact of active learning on student engagement in Philippine criminology courses. *Education and Society Review*, 22(2), 201-215. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Stuart, M., Lido, C., Morgan, J., Solomon, L., & May, S. (2011). The impact of engagement with extracurricular activities on the student experience and graduate outcomes for widening participation populations. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12(3), 203-215. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Topping, K. J. (2021). **Peer tutoring in educational settings: Insights from psychology.** *Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 41*(2), 105-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2020.1730316 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Adams, A. (2016). The role of simulations in Criminology education: Enhancing practical application of theoretical knowledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Alacantra, M. (2015). Student-centered teaching methods: Their impact on criminology education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Barton, L., et al. (2009). Critical pedagogy: Empowering students in contexts of social change. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Bautista, R. (2021). Technology in criminology education: Effectiveness and integration strategies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Brown, T., et al. (2018). Integration of active learning methods in criminology curricula: Faculty perspectives and practices. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Castle, O., & Dorr, M. (2018). Employer expectations of criminology graduates: Necessary skills and competencies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Carrington, K., & Hogg, R. (2017). Engaging diverse perspectives in criminology education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Christensen, R., et al. (2008). The potential of technology to enhance student engagement in higher education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Colvin, M., & Gaffey, T. (2023). Interactive assessments: Improving employability skills among criminology students. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Dela Cruz, L. (2023). Curriculum design challenges in criminology education: Aligning with professional demands. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Decker, S., & Huckabee, J. (2017). Embedding practical skills in criminology curricula: A pathway for professional readiness. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Eduarda, J. (2018). The need for inclusive pedagogical strategies in criminology education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Freeman, S., et al. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Garcia, A., & Lim, J. (2022). Evaluating complex learning outcomes: Challenges and frameworks in criminology assessment. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Hamilton, P. (2013). Engaging with public issues: The role of public criminology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Harding, L. (2022). Addressing sensitive topics in criminology education: Strategies and practices. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Hernandez, J. (2017). Traditional vs. innovative pedagogical practices in Philippine criminology programs. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Hernandez, J. (2020). Assessment methods in criminology education: Evaluating higher-order thinking skills. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Johnson, R. (2015). Effective case study methods in criminology education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Lynch, R., et al. (2022). The necessity of continuous professional development in education: Challenges and strategies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Occupational Culture in Relation to Job Satisfaction and Work Performance among Police
• Inmates' Character Reformation and Recidivism in Nigeria: A Study of Okaka Correctional Facility, Yenagoa, Bayelsa State.
• Life World of Former Female Basic Internal Security Operations Course (BISOC) Trainees
• Efficacy of Fingerprint and Facial Recognition in Enhancing National Security in Kenya
• No More Catcalling: Awareness of College of Criminal Justice Education Students on Republic Act 11313 Also Known as Safe Spaces Act