Three-Week Combined Manual Hip Mobilization and Progressive Weight-Bearing Training Improves Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Young Adults with Early-Stage Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Authors

Pratiksha Sayam

Department of Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy, Datta Meghe College of Physiotherapy, Nagpur, Maharashtra (India)

Harshada Wasade

Department of Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy, Datta Meghe College of Physiotherapy, Nagpur, Maharashtra (India)

Asavari Barshikar

Department of Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy, Datta Meghe College of Physiotherapy, Nagpur, Maharashtra (India)

Vedanti Bhure

Department of Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy, Datta Meghe College of Physiotherapy, Nagpur, Maharashtra (India)

Khushi Gelda

Department of Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy, Datta Meghe College of Physiotherapy, Nagpur, Maharashtra (India)

Rajas Mudey

Department of Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy, Datta Meghe College of Physiotherapy, Nagpur, Maharashtra (India)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.110200087

Subject Category: Applied Sciences

Volume/Issue: 11/2 | Page No: 1025-1029

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-02-21

Accepted: 2026-02-26

Published: 2026-03-14

Abstract

Background: Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head is a progressive musculoskeletal condition characterized by compromised blood supply leading to bone tissue death, pain, reduced mobility, restricted hip joint range of motion, and functional disability. Early-stage AVN commonly affects young adults and may progress rapidly to femoral head collapse if left untreated.
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of manual hip mobilization combined with progressive weight-bearing training on pain, hip joint range of motion, and functional disability in young adults with early-stage avascular necrosis of the femoral head.
Methods: A quasi-experimental interventional study was conducted on 15 young adults diagnosed with radiographically confirmed early-stage AVN (Ficat–Arlet Stage I–II). Participants underwent a supervised physiotherapy intervention for three weeks consisting of Maitland Grade I, II and III manual hip mobilization combined with progressive weight-bearing training and routine physiotherapy exercises. Pain intensity, hip joint range of motion (ROM), and functional disability were assessed using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), universal goniometry, and Harris Hip Score (HHS). Statistical analysis was performed using paired t-test.
Results: Significant improvement in pain, hip joint range of motion, and functional outcomes was observed following the intervention. NPRS scores reduced from 6.2 ± 1.1 to 2.8 ± 0.9, while Harris Hip Score improved from 62.5 ± 6.8 to 84.2 ± 5.7 (p < 0.001). Hip joint range of motion was found to be restricted at baseline due to pain and capsular stiffness; however, following the three-week physiotherapy intervention, an increase in active hip range of motion was observed in all planes of movement as assessed using universal goniometry.
Conclusion: A three-week physiotherapy program consisting of Maitland Grade I,II and III manual hip mobilization combined with progressive weight-bearing training significantly reduced pain and improved hip joint range of motion and functional outcomes in young adults with early-stage avascular necrosis of the femoral head, suggesting its effectiveness as a conservative intervention to reduce disability and enhance hip function.

Keywords

Avascular Necrosis, Manual Therapy, Weight-Bearing Training

Downloads

References

1. Mont MA, Cherian JJ, Sierra RJ, Jones LC, Lieberman JR. Nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head: where do we stand today? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(19):1604-1627. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Zhao DW, Yu M, Hu K, Wang W, Yang L, Wang BJ, et al. Prevalence of nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head in China. J Bone Miner Res. 2015;30(5):918-924. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Moya-Angeler J, Gianakos AL, Villa JC, Ni A, Lane JM. Current concepts on osteonecrosis of the femoral head. World J Orthop. 2015;6(8):590-601. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ficat RP, Arlet J. Functional investigation of bone under normal conditions. In: Hungerford DS, editor. Ischemia and Necrosis of Bone. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1980. p. 29-52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Maitland GD, Hengeveld E, Banks K, English K. Maitland’s Vertebral Manipulation. 8th ed. London: Elsevier; 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Kisner C, Colby LA, Borstad J. Therapeutic Exercise: Foundations and Techniques. 7th ed. Philadelphia: FA Davis; 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Neumann DA. Kinesiology of the Musculoskeletal System. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Norkin CC, White DJ. Measurement of Joint Motion: A Guide to Goniometry. 5th ed. Philadelphia: FA Davis; 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bijur PE, Silver W, Gallagher EJ. Reliability of the Numerical Pain Rating Scale for measurement of acute pain intensity. Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8(12):1153-1157. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51(4):737-755. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. French HP, Cusack T, Brennan A, Caffrey A. Exercise and manual therapy for hip osteoarthritis. Phys Ther Rev. 2011;16(3):196-204. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hoeksma HL, Dekker J, Ronday HK, Heering A, Van der Lubbe N, Vel C, et al. Manual therapy in osteoarthritis of the hip. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51(5):722-729. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Bennell KL, Egerton T, Pua YH, Abbott JH, Sims K, Metcalf B, et al. Efficacy of physiotherapy management for hip osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(2):317-323. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Trudelle-Jackson E, Smith SS. Effects of exercise on pain and function in patients with hip osteoarthritis. Phys Ther. 2004;84(12):1142-1156. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Fransen M, McConnell S. Exercise for osteoarthritis of the hip. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;4:CD007912 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles