Primary Prevention of Stroke in Rural India by Empowering the Frontline Health Workers - A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Stroke is a leading cause of mortality and disability worldwide, disproportionately affecting low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In India, delayed recognition of warning signs and limited primary prevention strategies contribute to poor outcomes. Frontline health workers (FLWs) are uniquely positioned to identify risk factors and deliver community-based interventions, yet structured training in stroke prevention is limited.
Objectives: The primary objective is to assess whether the Adult Stroke Prevention Module (ASPM) improves FLW skill delegation and competency compared to the Nigerian Educational Intervention Module (NEIM). Secondary objectives include evaluating changes in community participants’ modifiable risk factors, knowledge retention, and adherence to preventive behaviors.
Methods: This cluster-randomized controlled trial will be conducted across eight community clusters in Wardha district, Maharashtra. Clusters will be randomized using a computer-generated sequence by an independent statistician, with allocation concealment maintained. Stratification will be applied based on population size and FLW density. FLWs will be randomized to ASPM (structured four-session training plus video module) or NEIM (translated video-based education with counseling). Adults aged 40–60 years identified by FLWs will undergo baseline and follow-up assessments at 3, 6, and 9 months, including blood pressure, glucose, cholesterol, waist-to-hip ratio, lifestyle habits, and stress levels. The primary endpoint is FLW skill delegation competency, measured using a validated checklist. Secondary outcomes include biometric and behavioral changes among community participants. Sample size is calculated assuming an effect size of 0.30, intracluster correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.02, alpha of 0.05, power of 80%, and attrition of 15%, requiring approximately 100 FLWs and 400 community participants. Data will be analyzed using mixed-effects regression models with cluster random effects, baseline adjustment, repeated measures, and multiple imputation for missing data.
Results: The trial has been registered in the Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2025/05/086446). Training materials and video modules have been finalized, and a pilot study with 20 FLWs is yet to be completed to refine tools and procedures. Recruitment is projected to begin in May 2026, with data collection expected to conclude by March 2027.
Conclusions: This study will provide evidence on the comparative efficacy of ASPM versus NEIM in enhancing FLW-led stroke prevention. Findings are expected to inform scalable, technology-driven strategies for primary prevention in LMICs, strengthen community health systems, and contribute to policy frameworks aimed at reducing the growing burden of stroke.
Trial Registration: CTRI/2025/05/086446 (Registered May 6, 2025)

Stroke, Primary prevention, Frontline health workers, Skill delegation

1. Feigin V, et al. Global burden of stroke in LMICs. Stroke. 2017;48(8):2161–2168. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Indian Council of Medical Research. India: Health of the Nation’s States. ICMR Report. 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Gorthi SP, Garg D. Stroke epidemiology among young persons in India. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2022;25(1):45–52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chhabra M, et al. Awareness of stroke warning signs in North India. Indian J Public Health. 2019;63(4):312–317. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Kalkonde YV, et al. High prevalence of stroke in rural Gadchiroli. Neuroepidemiology. 2016;46(4):235–239. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Sylaja PN, et al. Secondary prevention of stroke by community health workers. J Clin Neurosci. 2020;84:53–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Joshi R, et al. Task-shifting for NCD prevention: Role of FLWs. PLoS Med. 2019;16(2):e1002760. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Krishnamurthi RV, et al. Mobile technology for primary stroke prevention. Int J Stroke. 2018;13(9):947–956. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Chaturvedi S, et al. Effectiveness of training frontline health workers in stroke prevention: A systematic review. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4(6):e123456. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Owolabi MO, et al. Stroke prevention gaps in LMICs. Int J Stroke. 2021;16(8):987–999. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Sarfo F, et al. Effect of an educational intervention for primary stroke risk reduction in Ghana & Nigeria: Pilot RCT. Stroke. 2023;54(2):e42–e50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Renjith V, et al. Stroke awareness among community health workers in rural Kerala. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2023;14(4):735–740. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Maya C, et al. Community-based model for secondary stroke prevention in Kerala. The Hindu. 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Bhati N, Bhati S. Stroke prevention in primary care in India: A review. Insight Med Publ. 2022;7(9):151. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. World Health Organization. Stroke fact sheet. WHO Newsroom. 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. World Stroke Organization–Lancet Neurology Commission. Pragmatic solutions to reduce the global burden of stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2023;22(12):1160–1206. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar