Mapping Technological Frontiers in Construction Planning and Scheduling: A Bibliometric Review (2015-2025)

Construction planning and scheduling remain critical processes in project management, yet projects frequently experiences delay due to complex coordination, resource constraints, and dynamic project nature. While research into digital technologies to improve scheduling practices has increased steadily, systematic studies on the evolution of these solutions within the broader academic discourse of planning and scheduling remain limited. This study aims to map the development of technological solutions to construction planning and scheduling challenges through a bibliometric analysis of academic literature published between 2015 and 2025. Scopus databases were selected resulting in 359 peer-reviewed journal articles. Keyword co-occurrence analysis was conducted using VOS viewer to identify thematic relationships and research trends. The analysis revealed five major research themes: (1) optimization-based scheduling, (2) BIM and information integration, (3) operational construction management, (4) decision support and economic evaluation, and (5) artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. Results indicate that optimization algorithms remain backbone for methodological approach in addressing scheduling challenges, while BIM is the hub for digital platform in data integration and coordination. Emerging AI and machine learning themes currently augment predictive capabilities rather than replacing established scheduling methods. Overall, the finding demonstrates gradual shift in construction scheduling research from managerial-centric approaches towards computational aided optimization and digital planning environments. This study provides a structured overview of technological evolution in construction planning and scheduling domain.

Construction planning and scheduling; BIM; Optimization

1. Al-Sinan, M. A., Bubshait, A. A., & Aljaroudi, Z. (2024). Generation of Construction Scheduling through Machine Learning and BIM: A Blueprint. Buildings, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14040934 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al Nasseri, H., & Aulin, R. (2016). Enablers and barriers to project planning and scheduling based on construction projects in Oman. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 21(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.21315/jcdc2016.21.2.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. AlJassmi, H., Abduljalil, Y., & Philip, B. (2023). Towards self-recovering construction schedules: a new method for periodically updating project plans and optimizing recovery actions. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 22(4), 2335–2347. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2022.2153055 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Alzara, M., Attia, Y. A., Mahfouz, S. Y., Yosri, A. M., & Ehab, A. (2023). Building a Genetic Algorithm-Based and BIM-Based 5D Time and Cost Optimization Model. IEEE Access, 11, 122502–122515. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3317137 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Amer, F., & Golparvar-Fard, M. (2019). Automatic Understanding of Construction Schedules: Part-of-Activity Tagging. Proceedings of the 2019 European Conference on Computing in Construction, 1, 190–197. https://doi.org/10.35490/ec3.2019.196 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Amer, F., Jung, Y., & Golparvar-Fard, M. (2021). Transformer machine learning language model for auto-alignment of long-term and short-term plans in construction. Automation in Construction, 132, 103929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103929 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Amer, F., Koh, H. Y., & Golparvar-Fard, M. (2021). Automated Methods and Systems for Construction Planning and Scheduling: Critical Review of Three Decades of Research. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(7). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0002093 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Arantes, A., & Ferreira, L. M. D. F. (2020). Underlying causes and mitigation measures of delays in construction projects: An empirical study. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 25(2), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMPC-03-2019-0029 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Aziz, N. M., Mohd-Rahim, F. A., Chuing, L. S., & Le, E. W. (2019). Identification of project scheduling constraints using the quantitative approach. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(1), 374–381. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Baldwin, A., & Bordoli, D. (2014). Handbook for Construction Planning and Scheduling. In Handbook for Construction Planning and Scheduling. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118838167 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Basu, R. (2014). Managing quality in projects: An empirical study. International Journal of Project Management, 32(1), 178–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.02.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Brown, R. B., Dysert, L. R., Orr, J. P., Shakourifar, A., & Warhoe, S. P. (2020, August 13). AACEI recommended practice No. 91R-16: Schedule development. AACE International. https://web.aacei.org/docs/default-source/toc/toc_91r-16.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Chen, Z., Wang, H., Wang, B., Yang, L., Song, C., Zhang, X., Lin, F., & Cheng, J. C. P. (2024). Scheduling optimization of electric ready mixed concrete vehicles using an improved model-based reinforcement learning. Automation in Construction, 160(January), 105308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2024.105308 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hinze, J. W. (2020). Construction Planning and Scheduling. In The Civil Engineering Handbook. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420041217-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hong, Y., Xie, H., Bhumbra, G., & Brilakis, I. (2022). Improving the accuracy of schedule information communication between humans and data. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 53, 101645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2022.101645 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ke, Y., Zhang, J., & Philbin, S. P. (2023). Tradition and Innovation in Construction Project Management. Buildings, 13(6), 1537. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13061537 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kerzner, H. (2017). Project management : a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. In John Wiley & Sons, Inc (12th ed., Issue 12). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/2016045434 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. León-Romero, L. P., Aguilar-Fernández, M., Luque-Sendra, A., Zamora-Polo, F., & Francisco-Márquez, M. (2024). Characterization of the information system integrated to the construction project management systems. Heliyon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31886 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Page, M. J., Mckenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-wilson, E., Mcdonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement : an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Regona, M., Yigitcanlar, T., Hon, C. K. H., & Teo, M. (2023). Mapping Two Decades of AI in Construction Research: A Scientometric Analysis from the Sustainability and Construction Phases Lenses. Buildings, 13(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13092346 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Sanni-Anibire, M. O., Mohamad Zin, R., & Olatunji, S. O. (2022). Causes of delay in the global construction industry: a meta analytical review. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(8), 1395–1407. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1716132 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Wang, H. W., Lin, J. R., & Zhang, J. P. (2020). Work package-based information modeling for resource-constrained scheduling of construction projects. Automation in Construction, 109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102958 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Wefki, H., Elnahla, M., & Elbeltagi, E. (2024). BIM-based schedule generation and optimization using genetic algorithms. Automation in Construction, 164(October 2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2024.105476 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Wei, J., Liu, Y., Lu, X., Feng, Y., & Wang, Y. (2024). applied sciences Optimization of Tunnel Construction Schedule Considering Soft Logic. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Yap, J. B. H., Goay, P. L., Woon, Y. B., & Skitmore, M. (2021). Revisiting critical delay factors for construction: Analysing projects in Malaysia. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 60(1), 1717–1729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.11.021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Yin, J., Wang, H., Li, J., Zhang, Z., Cai, S., & Liu, W. (2024). Dispatching rule design for tower crane scheduling in prefabricated construction via genetic programming. Automation in Construction, 165, 105588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2024.105588 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Operational and Supply Chain Inefficiencies in Malaysian Service SMEs: A Case Study of Puncak Geliga Holidays Sdn Bhd
• Operational Factors Influencing Passenger Satisfaction at CAAP-Managed Airports