Wake Effects and Energy Yield Optimization under Realistic Wind Conditions at Ngong Hill Wind Farm

This study evaluates wind resource characteristics, wake effects, layout optimization, uncertainty, and operational strategies using long-term hourly wind data (2010 - 2019) and a one-year validation dataset from the year 2022. The power loss is analyzed using the Jensen wake model, and simulation for power output done with simulations in PYTHON®. The most frequent wind speeds occur within the 4 - 6 m/s range, with a mean extrapolated hub-height wind speed of 9.38 m/s at 50 m. The shape and scale parameters were k = 3.29 and c = 9.81 m/s, corresponding to a Betz-adjusted extractable power of 509 W/m², classifying the site as Wind Power Class V at 50 m. Wake modelling showed that the existing layout experiences wake losses of 28.2%, reducing the no-wake Annual Energy Produced (AEP) from 61.86 GWh to 44.41 GWh. Genetic Algorithm-based layout optimization aligned turbine spacing with the dominant wind direction (≥4D along-wind and ≥3D cross-wind), reducing wake losses to 23% and yielding an approximate 5% AEP improvement. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that ±0.02 variations in the wind shear exponent result in 6–8% changes in AEP, while ±10% perturbations in the Weibull scale parameter produce energy yield variations exceeding ±15%, magnitudes comparable to wake-loss reduction gains. Further, approximately 27% of annual hours occur at wind speeds below 6 m/s, primarily during May-August, as well as during nocturnal and early-morning hours (2100hours - 0300 hours). Maintenance scheduled within these low-wind windows incurs only about 15% of the energy loss associated with maintenance conducted at mean wind conditions, corresponding to an estimated 85% reduction in maintenance-related energy losses. The results demonstrate that maximizing energy yield at Ngong Hills requires a combined strategy integrating aerodynamic layout optimization, uncertainty-aware modelling, and wind-aware maintenance scheduling.

Annual Energy Produced; Jensen Wake Model

1. ALIN. (2020). Kajiado County Renewable Energy Atlas Arid Lands Information Network (ALIN). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Anshebo, G. A., Gebreyohanes, A. A., & Dessie, B. B. (2023). Green energy: An ideal energy solution for sustainable development of Afar region, Ethiopia. Journal of Energy, 2023(1), 8849321. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Archer, C. L., Wu, S., Ma, Y., & Jiménez, P. A. (2020). Two corrections for turbulent kinetic energy generated by wind farms in the WRF model. Monthly Weather Review, 148(12), 4823-4835. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Asfour, R., Brahimi, T., & El-Amin, M. F. (2022). Wind farm layout: Modeling and optimization using genetic algorithm. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, (Vol. 1008, No. 1, p. 012004). IOP Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ashkenazy, Y., & Yizhaq, H. (2023). The diurnal cycle and temporal trends of surface winds. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 601, 117907. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bastankhah, M., & Porté-Agel, F. (2016). A new analytical model for wind-turbine wakes. Renewable Energy, 70, 116–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.01.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bastankhah, M., & Porté-Agel, F. (2019). Wind farm power optimization via yaw angle control: A wind tunnel study. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 11(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bhimireddy, S. R., Sun, J., Wang, J., Kristovich, D. A., & Hiscox, A. L. (2024). Effect of small-scale topographical variations and fetch from roughness elements on the stable boundary layer turbulence statistics. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 190(1), 3. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bimenyimana, S., Wang, C., Asemota, G. N. O., Ihirwe, J. P., Tuyizere, M. N., Mwizerwa, F., ... & Abiyese, M. (2024). Geospatial analysis of wind energy siting suitability in the East African community. Sustainability, 16(4), 1514. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Boadu, S., & Otoo, E. (2024). A comprehensive review on wind energy in Africa: challenges, benefits and recommendations. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 191, 114035. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Bousla, M., Haddi, A., El Mourabit, Y., Sadki, A., Mouradi, A., El Kharrim, A., ... & Bossoufi, B. (2023). Analysis and comparison of wind potential by estimating the weibull distribution function: Application to wind farm in the northern of morocco. Sustainability, 15(20), 15087. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Brower, M. (2012). Wind resource assessment: A practical guide to developing a wind project. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Brown, T., Schlachtberger, D., Kies, A., Schramm, S., & Greiner, M. (2018). Synergies of sector coupling and transmission reinforcement in a cost-optimised, highly renewable European energy system. Energy, 160, 720-739. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Brugger, P., Debnath, M., Scholbrock, A., Fleming, P., Moriarty, P., Simley, E., ... & Porté-Agel, F. (2020). Lidar measurements of yawed-wind-turbine wakes: characterization and validation of analytical models. Wind Energy Science, 5(4), 1253-1272. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Burton, T., Jenkins, N., Sharpe, D., & Bossanyi, E. (2011). Wind energy handbook. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Charhouni, N. (2019). Realistic wind farm design layout optimization with different wind turbines types. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Croonenbroeck, C., & Hennecke, D. (2024). Wind farm layout optimization subject to cable cost, hub height, and a feasible 3D gaussian wake model implementation. Journal of energy and power technology, 6(1), 1-37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Dallas, S., Stock, A., & Hart, E. (2023). Control-oriented modelling of wind direction variability. Wind Energy Science Discussions, 2023, 1-42. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Ellabban, O., Abu-Rub, H., & Blaabjerg, F. (2014). Renewable energy resources: Current status, future prospects and their enabling technology. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39, 748-764. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Emami, A., & Noghreh, P. (2010). New approach on optimization in placement of wind turbines within wind farm by genetic algorithms. Renewable Energy, 35(7), 1559-1564. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Fields, N., Ryves, D., Yeganyan, R., Cannone, C., Tan, N., & Howells, M. (2023). Evidence-based policymaking: Insights and recommendations for the implementation of clean energy transition pathways for Kenya’s power sector. Energies, 16(23), 7904. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Frandsen, S. T. (2007). Turbulence and turbulence-generated structural loading in wind turbine clusters. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Früh, W. G. (2023). Assessing the performance of small wind energy systems using regional weather data. Energies, 16(8), 3500. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Gebraad, P. M., Teeuwisse, F. W., Van Wingerden, J. W., Fleming, P. A., Ruben, S. D., Marden, J. R., & Pao, L. Y. (2016). Wind plant power optimization through yaw control using a parametric model for wake effects—a CFD simulation study. Wind Energy, 19(1), 95-114. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC). (2023). Global Wind Report 2023. GWEC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Gori, F., Laizet, S., & Wynn, A. (2023). Sensitivity analysis of wake steering optimisation for wind farm power maximisation. Wind Energy Science Discussions, 2023, 1-33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Gudoshava, M., & Semazzi, F. (2016). Sensitivity of Wind Energy Potential Analysis over East Africa to Land Cover Change. In American Meteorological Society Meeting Abstracts (Vol. 96, p. 515). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Guirguis, D., Romero, D. A., & Amon, C. H. (2016). Toward efficient optimization of wind farm layouts: Utilizing exact gradient information. Applied Energy, 179, 110–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Han, Y., Wang, J., Li, X., Jin, K., Yang, B., Dong, X., & Wen, C. (2022). Experimental study of turbulence intensity on the wake characteristics of a horizontal-axis wind turbine. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 44(4), 9545-9563. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Hansen, M. (2015). Aerodynamics of Wind Turbines. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Houle, J., & van Breugel, F. (2023). Near-surface wind variability over spatiotemporal scales relevant to plume tracking insects. Physics of Fluids, 35(5). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Hwang, C., Jeon, J.-H., Kim, G.-H., Kim, E., Park, M., & Yu, I.-K. (2015). Modelling and simulation of the wake effect in a wind farm. Journal of International Council on Electrical Engineering, 5(1), 74–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/22348972.2015.1109793 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2021). Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Jain, P. (2011). Wind energy engineering. McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Kamau, J. N., Kinyua, R., & Gathua, J. K. (2010). 6 years of wind data for Marsabit, Kenya average over 14m/s at 100m hub height; An analysis of the wind energy potential. Renewable Energy, 35(6), 1298–1302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2009.10.008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Kenya Engineer Magazine. (2018). Firm receives loan for Ngong Hills wind power project. Retrieved from https://www.kenyaengineer.co.ke/firm-receives-loan-for-ngong-hills-wind-power-project/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. KenGen. (2014). Ngong Power Station, 25MW. Retrieved from https://www.kengen.co.ke/index.php/wind-plant/ngong-power-station%2C-25mw.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. KenGen. (2015). Integrated annual report and financial statements for the year ended 30 June 2015. Kenya Electricity Generating Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. KenGen. (2025). Ngong wind farm details and ongoing projects. Retrieved from https://www.kengen.co.ke/index.php/business/projects/ongoing.html kengen.co.ke [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. King, J. A., Engelstaedter, S., Washington, R., & Munday, C. (2021). Variability of the Turkana low‐level jet in reanalysis and models: Implications for rainfall. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 126(10), e2020JD034154. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Kirby, A., Nishino, T., Lanzilao, L., Dunstan, T. D., & Meyers, J. (2025). Turbine-and farm-scale power losses in wind farms: an alternative to wake and farm blockage losses. Wind Energy Science, 10(2), 435-450.Lake Turkana Wind Power Project. (2023). Wind regime assessment in northern Kenya. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Kita, E., & Maruyam, T. (2011). Genetic Algorithm Based on Schemata Theory. In E. Kita (Ed.), Evolutionary Algorithms. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/15927 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Liu, J. H., Chen, J. C., & Corbita Jr, N. T. (2023). Analysis and comparison of turbulence models on wind turbine performance using SCADA data and machine learning technique. Cogent Engineering, 10(1), 2167345. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Lu, X., Huang, S., Wang, D., Luo, Y., Gamage, T. P., & Kumara, P. T. P. (2023). In Situ Observation of Near-Surface Wind Seasonal Variation on the Southern Coast of Sri Lanka. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 11(9), 1721. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Manwell, J. F., McGowan, J. G., & Rogers, A. L. (2009). Wind Energy Explained: Theory, Design and Application. 705. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Milan, P., Wächter, M., & Peinke, J. (2013). Turbulent character of wind energy. Physical review letters, 110(13), 138701. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Niayifar, A., & Porté-Agel, F. (2016). Analytical modeling of wind farms: A new approach for power prediction, Energies, 9, 741. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Porté-Agel, F., Bastankhah, M., & Shamsoddin, S. (2020). Wind-turbine and wind-farm flows: a review. Boundary-layer meteorology, 174(1), 1-59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Pranupa, S., Sriram, A. T., & Nagaraja Rao, S. (2023). A review of wind farm layout optimization techniques for optimal placement of wind turbines. International Journal of Renewable Energy Research, 13(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. REN21. (2023). Renewables 2023 global status report. REN21 Secretariat. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Safari, M. A. M., Masseran, N., & Majid, M. H. A. (2022). Wind energy potential assessment using Weibull distribution with various numerical estimation methods: A case study in Mersing and Port Dickson, Malaysia. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 148(3), 1085-1110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Sai, R., & Lin, B. (2022). Productivity assessment of power generation in Kenya: What are the impacts? Energy, 254, 124200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124200 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Samorani, M. (2010). The Wind Farm Layout Optimization Problem. In P. M. Pardalos, S. Rebennack, M. V. F. Pereira, N. A. Iliadis, & V. Pappu (Eds.), Handbook of Wind Power Systems (pp. 21–38). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41080-2_2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Shakoor, R., Hassan, M. Y., Raheem, A., & Wu, Y. K. (2016). Wake effect modeling: A review of wind farm layout optimization using Jensen׳ s model. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 58, 1048-1059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.229 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Shi, H., Dong, Z., Xiao, N., & Huang, Q. (2021). Wind speed distributions used in wind energy assessment: a review. Frontiers in Energy Research, 9, 769920. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Staffell, I., & Green, R. (2014). How does wind farm performance decline with age? Renewable Energy, 66, 775–786. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Stanley, A. P., & Ning, A. (2019). Coupled wind turbine design and layout optimization with nonhomogeneous wind turbines. Wind Energy Science, 4(1), 99-114. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Stevens, R. J., & Meneveau, C. (2017). Flow structure and turbulence in wind farms. Annual review of fluid mechanics, 49(1), 311-339. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-010816-060206. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Tai, S. L., Berg, L. K., Krishnamurthy, R., Newsom, R., & Kirincich, A. (2023). Validation of turbulence intensity as simulated by the Weather Research and Forecasting model off the US northeast coast. Wind Energy Science, 8(3), 433-448. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. The Wind Power. (n.d.). Wind energy database. Retrieved March 20, 2025, from The Wind Power homepage [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. The Wind Power. (n.d.). Vestas V52-850 wind turbine. Retrieved March 20, 2025, from Vestas V52-850 turbine page [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Thomas, J. J., Baker, N. F., Malisani, P., Quaeghebeur, E., Sanchez Perez-Moreno, S., Jasa, J., ... & Ning, A. (2023). A comparison of eight optimization methods applied to a wind farm layout optimization problem. Wind Energy Science, 8(5), 865-891. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Tian, W., Shi, Q., Zhang, L., Ren, H., Yu, H., Chen, Y., ... & Bai, Y. (2024). Effect of turbulence intensity on aerodynamic loads of floating wind turbine under wind–wave coupling effect. Sustainability, 16(7), 2967. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Tumse, S., Bilgili, M., Yildirim, A., & Sahin, B. (2024). Comparative analysis of global onshore and offshore wind energy characteristics and potentials. Sustainability, 16(15), 6614. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Veers, P., Dykes, K., Lantz, E., Barth, S., Bottasso, C. L., Carlson, O., ... & Wiser, R. (2019). Grand challenges in the science of wind energy. Science, 366(6464), eaau2027 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Wu, C., Wang, Q., Luo, K., & Fan, J. (2022). Mesoscale impact of the sea surface on the performance of offshore wind farms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 372, 133741. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Yang, P., & Najafi, H. (2022). The effect of using different wake models on wind farm layout optimization: A comparative study. Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 144(7), 070904. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Yang, Q., Li, H., Li, T., & Zhou, X. (2021). Wind farm layout optimization for levelized cost of energy minimization with combined analytical wake model and hybrid optimization strategy. Energy Conversion and Management, 248, 114778. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Yang, Y., Cao, Y., Qian, Z., Wang, J., Zhu, Y., Chen, X., ... & Chen, S. (2024). A Study on the Effect of Turbulence Intensity on Dual Vertical-Axis Wind Turbine Aerodynamic Performance. Energies, 17(16), 4124. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Yu, Q., Bangalore, P., Fogelström, S., & Sagitov, S. (2024). Optimal preventive maintenance scheduling for wind turbines under condition monitoring. Energies, 17(2), 280. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Zehtabiyan-Rezaie, N., & Abkar, M. (2024). An extended k− ɛ model for wake-flow simulation of wind farms. Renewable Energy, 222, 119904. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Zhang, F., Zhang, X., Xu, Z., Dong, K., Li, Z., & Liu, Y. (2024). Cleaning of Abnormal Wind Speed Power Data Based on Quartile RANSAC Regression. Energies, 17(22), 5697. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Zhang, Z., & Huang, P. (2023). Prediction of multiple-wake velocity and wind power using a cosine-shaped wake model. Renewable Energy, 219, 119418. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Zhao, H., Wu, Q., Hu, S., Xu, H., & Rasmussen, C. N. (2015). Review of energy storage system for wind power integration support. Applied energy, 137, 545-553. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Work Function of Metal Back Contact Surface Alloy Molybdenum (Mo) With Tungsten (W) For Copper Indium Gallium Selenide (Cigs) Thin Film Solar Cell: Simulation Using Scaps-1d And Density Functional Theory (Dft) Using Winmostar Quantum Espresso
• Biodegradable Materials and Renewable Materials Innovation with Eggshell Powder in Sustainable Product Design
• Investigation of Zinc Cobaltite (ZnCo₂O₄) as a Hole Transport Layer for Perovskite Solar Cells: Implications for Renewable-Energy Research and Innovation
• Predictive Modeling of Demand Response Impact on Solar-Integrated Power Systems Using Bayesian Optimisation Long Short-Term Memory Neural Networks
• Gis-Based Spatial Classification of Onshore Wind Energy Potential in Nigeria