Environmental Pollution and Carbon Accountability: Will Energy Efficiency Budgeting and Banks Portfolios Carbon Footprint Facilitate United Kingdom's 2050 Net-Zero Emissions?

The energy and financial sectors have been incorporated into the quest to solve climate change, with increasing recognition of the direct impacts that financial institutions' lending and investment practices have on environmental sustainability. This study applies Quantile Autoregressive Distribution Lags (QARDL) Model to examine the dynamic impact of energy efficiency budgeting on carbon dioxide emissions, controlling carbon footprint of banks’ portfolios in United Kingdom. First, an in-depth descriptive statistics analysis of data for various variables are conducted. The study then uses Quantile Augmented Dickey-Fuller to test for stationarity, then proceeds to perform Quantile Cointegration test and closely followed by Quantile Autoregressive Distributed Lags (QARDL) estimation to examine the impact of energy efficiency budgeting and carbon footprint of banks’ portfolios on carbon dioxide emissions. The empirical results validate the findings of stationarity for each variable. There is evidence of first-order differential integration I (1) among variables. There is a cointegration link between the three variables and that they have a more prolonged and stabled relationship. The results showed that energy efficiency budgeting has a reducing effect on carbon dioxide emissions. Its effectiveness varies across different emission quantiles, there is the need for a flexible budgeting approach. Policymakers should develop mechanisms to adjust budget allocations based on current emission levels, potentially increasing budget during periods when the impact is likely to be strongest. However, carbon footprint of banks portfolios promote rise in carbon dioxide reduction. The central bank of UK should implement mandatory carbon screening tools for bank portfolios. These mechanisms would help banks understand and manage their immediate carbon impact. Banks should be required to develop comprehensive carbon accounting systems that track both direct and indirect emissions from their investments

Keywords

United Kingdom; Energy Efficiency Budgeting

Downloads

PDF JATS XML

References

1. Agyemang, E. T., Agyare, F. Y., & Ofori, K. (2024). Can Turkey's Environmental Pollution be Mitigated by Carbon Footprint of Bank Loans, Environmental Protection Expenditures and Taxes? International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(1), 330-352. https://doi.org/10.51244/IJRSI.2024.1108078 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Anggraini, S. P., Handayani, S. (2021). Pengaruh Tekanan Stakeholders, Sertifikasi ISO 14001, Protabilitas dan Leverage Terhadap Pengungngkapan Emisi Karbon. Jurnal Ilmu Komputer, Ekonomi dan Manajemen, 1(1), 153-168. 2(1), 1171-1186. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Battiston, S., Mandel, A., Monasterolo, I., Schütze, F., & Visentin, G. (2017). A climate stress-test of the financial system. Nature Climate Change, 7(4), 283-288. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Baumol, W.J., & Oates, W.E. (1988). The Theory of Environmental Policy [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bertoldi, P., & Mosconi, R. (2020). Do energy efficiency policies save energy? A new approach based on energy policy indicators (in the EU Member States). Energy Policy, 139, 111320. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Campiglio, E., Dafermos, Y., Monnin, P., Ryan-Collins, J., Schotten, G., & Tanaka, M. (2018). Climate change challenges for central banks and financial regulators. Nature climate change, 8(6), 462-468. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Campiglio, E., et al. (2018). "Climate change challenges for economic and financial policies". Economic and Political Studies [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Carney, M. (2015). Breaking the tragedy of the horizon–climate change and financial stability. Speech given at Lloyd’s of London, 29, 220-230. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. choltens, B. (2014). "Long-Term Finance and Sustainable Banking". International Review of Financial Analysis [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Christi, B. U. (2015). Profitabilitas, Leverage, Ukuran Perusahaan, Sertifikasi ISO 14001, dan Pengungkapan Emisi Karbon (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan yang Mengungkapan Sustainability Report dan terdaftar di BEI pada tahun 2015-2017). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, organizations and society, 33(4-5), 303-327. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Coase, R.H. (1960). "The Problem of Social Cost". Journal of Law and Economics [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy. (2022). Energy Company Obligation, 2022 to 2026. Available at (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/energy-company-obligation-2022-2026-innovation-guidance). Accessed on 15/01/2025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Ding, X., Ren, Y., Tan, W., & Wu, H. (2023). Does carbon emission of firms matter for Bank loans decision? Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 86, 102556. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Enright, N. (2017). Energy and Resource Efficiency: Without the Tears. Manchester. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. European Commission (EC). (2023) Overview of sustainable finance. Available at (https://finance.ec.europa.eu/sustainable-finance/overview-sustainable-finance_en#:~:text=Sustainable%20finance%20refers%20to%20the,sustainable%20economic%20activities%20and%20projects). Accessed on 28/01/2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Flachenecker, F., & Rentschler, J. (Eds.). (2018). Investing in resource efficiency: the economics and politics of financing the resource transition. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Hahn, R., & Lülfs, R. (2014). Legitimizing negative aspects in GRI-oriented sustainability reporting: A qualitative analysis of corporate disclosure strategies. Journal of business ethics, 123, 401-420. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Hirst, E., & Brown, M. (1990). Closing the efficiency gap: barriers to the efficient use of energy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 3(4), 267-281. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Huang, A., Guo, M., Dai, L., Mirza, A., & Ali, S. (2024). Budgeting for a greener future: Asymmetric nexus between nuclear energy technology budgets and CO2 emissions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 202, 123321. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. International Energy Agency (IEA) (2023). Energy Technology RD&D Budgets. Available at (https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data-tools/energy-technology-rdd-budgets-data-explorer). Accessed on 20/01/2025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. International Energy Agency (IEA). (2019). World Energy Outlook 2019. Paris: IEA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Iyke-Ofoedu, M. I., Nwonye, N. G., Abner, I. P., Ezeaku, H. C., & Ubani, O. (2023). Impact of carbon footprint of bank loans and fossil fuel subsidies on ecological footprint in Tunisia: A contingency and asymmetric analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 426, 139026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Jaffe, A. B., & Stavins, R. N. (1994). The energy-efficiency gap What does it mean?. Energy policy, 22(10), 804-810. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Johnson, A. E. (2022). How to find joy in climate action [TED Talk]. TED Conferences. Retrieved from https://www.ted.com/talks/ayana_elizabeth_johnson_how_to_find_joy_in_climate_action [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Koutsandreas, D., Spiliotis, E., Doukas, H., & Psarras, J. (2021). What is the macroeconomic impact of higher decarbonization speeds? The case of Greece. Energies, 14(8), 2235. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Krauss, A., Krüger, P., & Meyer, J. (2016). Sustainable finance in Switzerland: where do we stand?. Swiss Finance Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Lash, J., & Wellington, F. (2007). Competitive advantage on a warming planet. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Lee, J., Kim, S., & Kim, E. (2023). The effect of managerial ability on voluntary disclosure of carbon emissions. Borsa Istanbul Review, 23(3), 685-695. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Li, C., Sampene, A. K., Agyeman, F. O., Brenya, R., Wiredu, J. (2022). The role of green finance and energy innovation in neutralizing environmental pollution: empirical evidence from the MINT economies. Journal of Environmental Management, 317, 115500. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Li, J., Li, S. (2020). Energy investment, economic growth and carbon emissions in China—Empirical analysis based on spatial Durbin model. Energy Policy, 140, 111425. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Loorbach, D., Schoenmaker, D., & Schramade, W. (2020). Finance in transition: Principles for a positive finance future. Rotterdam: Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Ma, Q., Murshed, M., & Khan, Z. (2021). The nexuses between energy investments, technological innovations, emission taxes, and carbon emissions in China. Energy Policy, 155, 112345. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Matsumura, E. M., Prakash, R., & Vera-Muñoz, S. C. (2014). Firm-value effects of carbon emissions and carbon disclosures. The accounting review, 89(2), 695-724. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Othman, A. H. A. (2023). Carbon Footprints of Bank Loans and Economic Activities' Carbon Dioxide Emissions: Insights from Advanced Economics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Pigou, A.C. (1920). The Economics of Welfare [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Pratiwi, P. C., & Sari, V. F. (2016). Pengaruh Tipe Industri , Media Exposure Dan Profitabilitas Terhadap [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Robins, N., Tickell, S., Irwin, W., & Sudmant, A. (2020). Financing climate action with positive social impact: How banking can support a just transition in the UK. Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, LSE: London, UK. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Rubino, A. (2017). Energy efficiency: Governance in the EU. Nature Energy, 2(6), 1-1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Semieniuk, G., Campiglio, E., Mercure, J. F., Volz, U., & Edwards, N. R. (2021). Low‐carbon transition risks for finance. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 12(1), e678. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Singh, N., Bacher, K., Song, R., Sotos, M. E., & Yin, L. (2015). Guide for Designing Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Programs. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Sorrell, S., Dimitropoulos, J., & Sommerville, M. (2009). Empirical estimates of the direct rebound effect: A review. Energy policy, 37(4), 1356-1371. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Stern, N. (2008). The economics of climate change. American Economic Review, 98(2), 1-37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Syabilla, D., Wijayanti, A., Fahria, R. (2021). Pengaruh investasi hijau dan keragaman dewan direksi terhadap pengungkapan emisi karbon. Konferensi Riset Nasional Ekonomi Manajemen Dan Akuntansi, [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Takahashi, K., & Shino, J. (2023). Greenhouse gas emissions and bank lending (Vol. 1078). Basel: Bank for International Settlements, Monetary and Economic Department. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Webb, J., Tingey, M., & Hawkey, D. (2017). What We Know about Local Authority Engagement in UK Energy Systems: Ambitions, Activities, Business Structures & Ways Forward. London and Loughborough: UKERC and ETI. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Weng, C., Huang, J., & Greenwood-Nimmo, M. (2023). The effect of clean energy investment on CO2 emissions: insights from a Spatial Durbin Model. Energy Economics, 126, 107000. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Williamson, R. F., Sudmant, A., & Gouldson, A. 2020. A Net Zero Carbon Roadmap for Edinburgh (pp. 1–30). London: Place-based Climate Action Network. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. World Wide Fund for Nature, (2021). The Big Smoke: The Global Emissions of the UK Financial Sector. Available at ( https://www.wwf.org.uk/sites/default/files/2021-05/uk_financed_emissions...). Accessed on 18/01/2025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Environmental Pollution and Carbon Accountability: Will Energy Efficiency Budgeting and Banks Portfolios Carbon Footprint Facilitate United Kingdom's 2050 Net-Zero Emissions?

Authors

Article Information

Publication Timeline

Abstract

Keywords

Downloads

References

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles