Assessment of Microplastic Pollution: Morphological and Polymer Characterisation of Microplastics in the Lubigi Wetland Ecosystem, Uganda
Authors
PhD Candidate Kampala International University, School of Natural and Applied Science (Uganda)
PhD Candidate Kampala International University, School of Natural and Applied Science (Uganda)
MSc. Candidate Kampala International University, School of Natural and Applied Science (Uganda)
College of Education, Open and Distance Learning, Kampala international University (Uganda)
Assoc. Prof. Hannington Twinomuhwezi
Associate Professor / Dean, School of Natural and Applied Sciences (Uganda)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.110400080
Subject Category: Environment
Volume/Issue: 11/4 | Page No: 1157-1165
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-04-14
Accepted: 2026-04-19
Published: 2026-05-08
Abstract
Urban wetlands are increasingly exposed to microplastic contamination driven by rapid urbanisation, inadequate waste management and expanding wastewater discharges. This study presents a comprehensive assessment of microplastics in the Lubigi Wetland (Kampala, Uganda). Water and sediment samples were collected from nine sites spanning upstream, midstream and downstream zones and from four vertical strata (surface, middle, bottom water and 0–10 cm sediment). Samples were processed by density separation (saturated NaCl), peroxide digestion and vacuum filtration; particles were morphologically classified by stereomicroscopy and polymer types confirmed by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR). A total of 1,118 microplastic particles were recorded: microbeads dominated (58.7%), followed by pellets (15.9%) and fragments (11.4%). Transparent particles comprised 42.8% of the assemblage and 61% of particles were < 0.001), with midstream sediment layers (notably Namungona and Nabweru) identified as depositional hotspots. FTIR confirmed polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polystyrene (PS), polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and Nylon6, with PET and PP more frequent in water and PE, PS and PVC more common in sediments. The dominance of microbeads and the polymer signature implicate urban and domestic sources (personal care products, packaging, wastewater and textile effluents) and reflect transport and depositional processes governed by hydrodynamics and wetland geomorphology. These findings align with regional and global observations that freshwater and wetland systems are important sinks and conduits for microplastics and underscore the need for targeted waste management, wastewater controls and routine monitoring to protect wetland ecosystem services and public health.
Keywords
Microplastics; Lubigi Wetland; FTIR; Microbeads
Downloads
References
1. Akankwasah, B. (2025). Beating plastic pollution in Uganda. National Environment Management Authority. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Ahmad Bhat, M., Gaga, E. O., & Gedik, K. (2024). How can contamination be prevented during laboratory analysis of atmospheric samples for microplastics? Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 196, 159. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Ahmad, T., Gul, S., Peng, L., & others. (2025). Microplastic mitigation in urban stormwater using green infrastructure: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 23, 999–1024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Aragaw, T. A. (2021). Microplastic pollution in African countries’ water systems: A review on findings, applied methods, characteristics, impacts, and managements. SN Applied Sciences, 3, 629. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Arévalo Hernández, J. J., Barrera de Brito, A. D., Scalon, J. D., & Silva, M. L. N. (2025). Spatial distribution and geostatistical prediction of microplastic abundance in a micro watershed with tropical soils in southeastern Brazil. Agronomy, 15(12), 2862. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Barboza, L. G. A. (2018). Microplastics in food: occurrence and implications. Marine Pollution Bulletin. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Bhardwaj, L. K., Rath, P., Yadav, P., & Gupta, U. (2024). Microplastic contamination, an emerging threat to the freshwater environment: a systematic review. Environmental Systems Research, 13, 8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Duong, T. T., Le, P. T., Nguyen, T. N. H., & others. (2022). Selection of a density separation solution to study microplastics in tropical riverine sediment. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 194, 65. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Huang, Y., Fan, J., Liu, H., & Lu, X. (2022). Vertical distribution of microplastics in the sediment profiles of Lake Taihu, eastern China. Sustainable Environment Research, 32, 44. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Käppler, A., Fischer, D., Oberbeckmann, S., Schernewski, G., Labrenz, M., Eichhorn, K.-J., & Voit, B. (2016). Analysis of environmental microplastics by vibrational microspectroscopy: FTIR, Raman or both? Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 408(29), 8377–8391. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Karami, A. (2017). Microplastics in sea salt. Scientific Reports. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Kosuth, M. (2018). Microplastics in drinking water. PLOS ONE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Latif, F., Aiman, I., Iram, S., Shahzad, M. M., & Malik, M. M. (2025). Microplastics in freshwater ecosystem: implication for trophic transfer, food security and human health risk. In Microplastics: Ecological and Food Security Implications (pp. 159–170). Springer Nature. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Mutuku, J., Yanotti, M., Tocock, M., & Hatton MacDonald, D. (2024). The abundance of microplastics in the world’s oceans: a systematic review. Oceans, 5(3), 398–428. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. National Environment Management Authority (NEMA). (2019). National State of the Environment Report 2018–2019. Kampala, Uganda.Notarstefano, V., & colleagues. (2019). Applications of Raman spectroscopy in biomedical microplastic detection. Journal references. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Nkuutu, D. N. (2025). Assessment of microplastic pollution: characterisation, quantification and spatial distribution in the Lubigi Wetland ecosystem, Uganda (MSc dissertation). Kampala International University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Plastics Europe. (2016). Plastics the Facts 2016: An analysis of European plastics production, demand and waste data. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Ribeiro Claro, P. J. A., Nolasco, M. M., & Araújo, C. (2017). Characterization of microplastics by Raman spectroscopy. Journal of Raman Spectroscopy. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Rosal, R. (2021). Morphological description of microplastic particles for environmental fate studies. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 171, 112716. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Saikia, K. K., & Handique, S. (2026). A global comparative study on microplastics sampling, identification and quantification techniques in freshwater environment: a review. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 237, 284. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Schymanski, D., Goldbeck, C., Humpf, H.-U., & Fürst, P. (2018). Analysis of microplastics in water by micro Raman spectroscopy: release of plastic particles from different packaging into mineral water. Water Research, 129, 154–162. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Schwabl, P., Köppel, S., Königshofer, P., Bucsics, T., Trauner, M., Reiberger, T., & Liebmann, B. (2019). Detection of various microplastics in human stool: a prospective case series. Annals of Internal Medicine, 171(7), 453–457. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Themba, N. N., Themba, S. T., Cuthbert, R. N., & colleagues. (2025). Microplastic assessment approaches for African freshwater biota: a review. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Thornton Hampton, L. M., Mehinto, A. C., & Weisberg, S. B. (2025). Standard operating procedures for the collection of samples for microplastics analysis Part 1: Surface sediment and aquatic biota. Southern California Coastal Water Research Project. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Tran, T. K., Tran, T. B., Nguyen, N. T., & others. (2025). The impact of plastic on the ecological environment: the pathway of microplastics and the control of microplastic pollution. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 236, 684. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Wang, Y., & Wang, J. (2020). Microplastics in freshwater environments: a review on occurrence, environmental effects, and methods for microplastics detection. Water Research, 183, 115956. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Wetzel, W. (2025). Identifying microplastics using ATR FT IR spectroscopy and Raman spectroscopy. Spectroscopy Online. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Wright, S. L., & Kelly, F. J. (2017). Plastic and human health: a micro issue? Environmental Science & Technology, 51(12), 6634–6647. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Zhihong Plastic. (2025). PET, PP, PE, PS, PA, ABS, PMMA, PVC common types of plastics: properties and applications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Methane Emissions from Municipal Solid Waste - Case Study in Cai Rang District, Can Tho City, Vietnam
- Youth Activism, Intentional Integration of Policies to Raise Awareness on Climate Change Action among the Youth
- Breathing Spaces: Environmental & User Experience in Dhanmondi and Zigatola Multistoried Apartments, Dhaka, Bangladesh
- Effects of Solid Waste Disposal on Soil Quality in Makurdi Metropolis, Benue State, Nigeria
- Environmental Impact of Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining in Borgu Local Government Area