Comparative Insights into Fungal and Bacterial Cellulases: Efficiency and Applications

Cellulases are pivotal enzymes in the bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass, finding applications across waste management, biofuel production, and industrial processes. Among microbial sources, fungi and bacteria represent two dominant and distinct producers of cellulases, each with unique enzyme systems, biochemical properties, and operational advantages. This review presents a comparative analysis of fungal and bacterial cellulases, focusing on their structural differences, catalytic efficiency, environmental stability, and industrial relevance. The synergistic use of both microbial types is also explored as an emerging strategy to enhance cellulose degradation. This synthesis aims to guide future research and practical applications by evaluating the strengths, limitations, and evolving potential of fungal and bacterial cellulases in sustainable waste valorisation and bioeconomic systems.

Cellulase, Lignocellulosic biomass, Waste management

1. Srivastava N, Rawat R, Singh Oberoi H, Ramteke PW. A review on fuel ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass. International Journal of Green Energy. 2015. 12:949-60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Zhang YH, Lynd LR. Toward an aggregated understanding of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: noncomplexed cellulase systems. Biotechnology and bioengineering. 2004 88:797-824. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Wang N, Ren K, Jia R, Chen W, Sun R. Expression of a fungal manganese peroxidase in Escherichia coli: a comparison between the soluble and refolded enzymes. BMC biotechnology. 2016. 16:1-5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Sher H, Zeb N, Zeb S, Ali A, Aleem B, Iftikhar F, Rahman SU, Rashid MH. Microbial cellulases: a review on strain development, purification, characterization and their industrial applications. Journal of Bacteriology and Mycology. 2021.8:1180-1095. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Taherzadeh MJ, Karimi K. Enzymatic-based hydrolysis processes for ethanol from lignocellulosic materials: A review. BioResources. 2007. 2: 707-38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Lee SM, Koo YM. Pilot-scale production of cellulase using Trichoderma Reesei rut C-30 fed-batch mode. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2001. 11:229-233. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Shewale JG. β-Glucosidase: its role in cellulase synthesis and hydrolysis of cellulose. International Journal of Biochemistry. 1982. 14 435-443. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Woodward J, Wiseman A. Fungal and other β-d-glucosidases—their properties and applications. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 1982. 4:73-79. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ryu DD, Mandels M. Cellulases: biosynthesis and applications. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 1980. 2 :91-102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Samdhu DK, Bawa S. Improvement of cellulase activity in Trichoderma. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 1992. 34:175-183. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Wood TM, McCrae SI, Bhat KM. The mechanism of fungal cellulase action. Synergism between enzyme components of Penicillium pinophilum cellulase in solubilizing hydrogen bond-ordered cellulose. Biochemical Journal. 1989. 260:37-43. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Shah, Kamlesh & Sutaria, Devanshi, Microbiology and Biotechnology in Human Life, Chapter -3 Microbial Cellulase: Production, Purification and Application, JPS Scientific Publications, 2020, 50-75 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Imran M, Anwar Z, Irshad M, Asad MJ, Ashfaq H. Cellulase production from species of fungi and bacteria from agricultural wastes and its utilization in industry: a review. Advances in Enzyme Research. 2016. 4 :44-55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Sharada R, Venkateswarlu G, Venkateswar S, Rao MA. Applications of Cellulases-Review. International Journal of Pharmaceutical, Chemical & Biological Sciences. 2014. 4: 424-437. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Singh S, Chakravarty I, Khade SM, Srivastava J, Sinha R. Cellulase: a catalytic powerhouse for lignocellulosic waste valorisation. In Thermochemical and Catalytic Conversion Technologies for Future Biorefineries: 2022. 1:157-187. Springer Nature. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kuhad RC, Gupta R, Singh A. Microbial cellulases and their industrial applications. Enzyme research. 2011:280696. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Hayashida S, Ohta K, Mo K. Cellulases of Humicola insolens and Humicola grisea. In Methods in Enzymology 1988. 160, pp. 323-332. Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Ellouz Chaabouni S, Belguith H, Hassairi I, M'rad K, Ellouz R. Optimization of cellulase production by Penicillium occitanis. Applied microbiology and biotechnology. 1995. 43:267-9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, Van Zyl WH, Pretorius IS. Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiology and molecular biology reviews. 2002. 66:506-77. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Schwarz W. The cellulosome and cellulose degradation by anaerobic bacteria. Applied microbiology and biotechnology. 2001.56:634-49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kant S, Das S, Roy S, Tripathy S. Fungal cellulases: a comprehensive review. The Nucleus. 2024. 24:1-7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Bala A, Singh B. Cellulolytic and xylanolytic enzymes of thermophiles for the production of renewable biofuels. Renewable Energy. 2019 136:1231-1244. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Kazeem MO. Enhanced cellulase production by a novel thermophilic Bacillus licheniformis 2D55: characterization and application in lignocellulosic saccharification. Bioresources 2016. 11:5404-5423. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Ajeje SB, Hu Y, Song G, Peter SB, Afful RG, Sun F, Asadollahi MA, Amiri H, Abdulkhani A, Sun H. Thermostable cellulases/xylanases from thermophilic and hyperthermophilic microorganisms: current perspective. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2021. 9: 794304. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Islam F, Roy N. Screening, purification and characterization of cellulase from cellulase producing bacteria in molasses. BMC research notes. 2018. 11:1-6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Duan CJ, Huang MY, Pang H, Zhao J, Wu CX, Feng JX. Characterization of a novel theme C glycoside hydrolase family 9 cellulase and its CBM-chimeric enzymes. Applied microbiology and biotechnology. 2017. 101:5723-5737. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Ghosh S, Godoy L, Anchang KY, Achilonu CC, Gryzenhout M. Fungal cellulases: Current research and future challenges. Industrially Important Fungi for Sustainable Development: Volume 2: Bioprospecting for Biomolecules. 2021:263-98. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Bhardwaj N, Kumar B, Agrawal K, Verma P. Current perspective on production and applications of microbial cellulases: a review. Bioresources and Bioprocessing. 2021. 8:1-34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Ejaz U, Sohail M, Ghanemi A. Cellulases: from bioactivity to a variety of industrial applications. Biomimetics. 2021. 6:44. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. de Souza TS, Kawaguti HY. Cellulases, hemicellulases, and pectinases: Applications in the food and beverage industry. Food and Bioprocess Technology. 2021. 14 :1446-1477. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Budhraja AA, Roy R. Advancements in cellulase enzyme technology: applications, challenges, and future perspectives. International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science. 2024. 6:3988-4002. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Rawat S, Singh A, Rajput VD, Ghazaryan K, Minkina T, Mohammad Said Al-Tawaha AR, Al-Tawaha AR, Adel Qotb M, Karnwal A. Microbial Enzymes for Eco-Friendly Recycling of Wastepaper by Deinking. In Microbial Applications for Environmental Sustainability 2024 pp. 165-176. Springer Nature. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Dadwal A, Sharma S, Satyanarayana T. Progress in ameliorating beneficial characteristics of microbial cellulases by genetic engineering approaches for cellulose saccharification. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2020. 11:1387. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Bajar S, Singh A, Bishnoi NR. Exploration of low-cost agro-industrial waste substrate for cellulase and xylanase production using Aspergillus heteromorphus. Applied Water Science. 2020.10:1-9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Narisetty V, Tarafdar A, Bachan N, Madhavan A, Tiwari A, Chaturvedi P, Varjani S, Sirohi R, Kumar V, Awasthi MK, Binod P. An overview of cellulase immobilization strategies for biofuel production. BioEnergy Research. 2023. 16: 4-15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Singhania RR, Patel AK, Sukumaran RK, Larroche C, Pandey A. Retracted: Role and significance of beta-glucosidases in the hydrolysis of cellulose for bioethanol production. Bioresource technology. 2013. 127:500-507. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Fonseca, L.M., Parreiras, L.S. & Murakami, M.T. Rational engineering of the Trichoderma reesei RUT-C30 strain into an industrially relevant platform for cellulase production. Biotechnol Biofuels 2020.13, 93. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Zhang J, Li K, Sun Y, Yao C, Liu W, Liu H, Zhong Y. An efficient CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing system based on a multiple sgRNA processing platform in Trichoderma reesei for strain improvement and enzyme production. Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts. 2024 Feb 11;17(1):22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Sajith S, Priji P, Sreedevi S, Benjamin S. An overview on fungal cellulases with an industrial perspective. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Iqbal HM, Ahmed I, Zia MA, Irfan M. Purification and characterization of the kinetic parameters of cellulase produced from wheat straw by Trichoderma viride under SSF and its detergent compatibility. Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology. 2011 Jun 1;2(3):149. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Fatima N, Ahmad IR, Shakir HA, Khan M, Franco MA, Irfan M. Production and characterization of cellulases from Aspergillus niger under static fermentation. Cellul. Chem. Technol. 2024 Jul 1;58:705-12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Ugras S, Bicen HE, Emire Z. Determination of cellulase enzyme produced by Bacillus cereus DU-1 isolated from soil, and its effects on cotton fiber. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology. 2024 May 31;67:e24230391. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Dikbaş N, Al Dahluz WS, Alım Ş, Uçar S. Partial Purification and Biochemical Characterization of Cellulase from Bacillus pumilus ND8 Isolated from Garden Waste. Türk Doğa ve Fen Dergisi. 2024 Sep 9;13(3):62-6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Malik WA, Javed S. Biochemical characterization of cellulase from Bacillus subtilis strain and its effect on digestibility and structural modifications of lignocellulose rich biomass. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology. 2021 Dec 20; 9:800265. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Contreras Leiva F. Cellulase protein engineering towards improved thermostability (Doctoral dissertation, Dissertation, RWTH Aachen University, 2021). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Zheng N, Cai Y, Zhang Z, Zhou H, Deng Y, Du S, Tu M, Fang W, Xia X. Tailoring industrial enzymes for thermostability and activity evolution by the machine learning-based iCASE strategy. Nature Communications. 2025 Jan 11;16(1):604. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Zhang H, Zhu T, Zhai Q, Chen Q, Zhang X, Chen Y, He W, Li J, Fan J, Tao J, Hu X. Two-step computational redesign of Bacillus subtilis cellulase and β-glucanase for enhanced thermostability and activity. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2025 Jan 1;285:138274. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Quantitative Assessment of Serum C - Reactive Protein Levels among Smokers and Non Smokers
• Extraction and Characterization of Eco-Friendly Hair Dye from Agricultural Waste: A Study on Coconut Husk
• Intermittent Preventive Treatment among Pregnant Women Attending a Tertiary Healthcare Facility in Jos, North Central Nigeria: Adherence Patterns and Preliminary Assessment of Associated Factors
• Assessment Of Degradative Potentials Of Bacteria Isolated From Palm Oil-Polluted Site Using Spectrophotometric Method
• An Analysis of Machine and Deep Learning Insights on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology