A Bottom-Up Comparative Assessment of LNG and Diesel Fuel Pathways for Decarbonizing Port Operations

Maritime ports represent concentrated emissions zones due to the simultaneous operation of manoeuvring ships, auxiliary engines and diesel-driven cargo equipment. This research applies a detailed bottom-up framework to quantify emissions arising from port operations, comparing marine diesel oil (MDO) to liquefied natural gas (LNG). A 600,000 TEU container terminal was modelled with representative vessel data and operating pro-files sourced from simulation, auxiliary load modelling and equipment duty cycles. Marine diesel operation produced approximately 595,000 tonnes per year of carbon dioxide (CO2), 6,480 tonnes per year of sulphur oxides (SOx), 276 tonnes per year of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and 14.2 tonnes per year of particulate matter (PM). Switching to LNG eliminated SOx, reduced PM by more than eighty per cent and lowered NOx by fifty-eight per cent, while cutting CO2 emissions by approximately twenty-two per cent. Yet even under LNG, the terminal would require more than 150,000 hectares of mature temperate forest to offset its residual CO2. The analysis highlights LNG as an effective transitional fuel that alleviates air quality burdens while ports invest in electrification and prepare for zero-carbon alternatives such as ammonia, hydrogen and renewable-derived synthetic fuels.

Liquefied Natural Gas; Marine Diesel

1. UNCTAD. Review of Maritime Transport 2019. United Nations, Geneva, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Endresen, Ø., Sørgård, E., Sundet, J.K. Emissions from international shipping. JGR, 108(D17), 2003. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Corbett, J.J., Winebrake, J., Green, E. Mortality from ship emissions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41, 8512–8518, 2007. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Viana, M., Hammingh, P., Colette, A. Impact of maritime emissions. Atmospheric Environment 90, 96–105, 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Liu, H., Fu, M., Jin, X. Shipping inventories in China. Sci Total Environ. 590, 202–213, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Eyring, V., Kühn, A., Lauer, A. Transport impacts on climate. Atmospheric Envi-ronment 44, 4735–4771, 2010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. IMO. MARPOL Annex VI: Air Pollution Prevention Regulations, 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. IMO. Initial GHG Reduction Strategy, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Trozzi, C. Maritime emission inventory methods. Techne Consulting, 2010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Jalkanen, J.P., Kalli, J., Pettersson, H. Marine traffic exhaust model. Atmospheric Chem Phys 9, 2009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Johansson, L., Jalkanen, J. Shipping emissions in Baltic Sea. Oceanologia 59, 456–468, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Watson, I., Singh, A. Port emissions contribution. Atmos Pollution Res, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Huang, L., Zhang, T. Guangzhou port shipping emissions. J Cleaner Production, 188, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Sharafian, A., Sattari, S. LNG marine fuel review. Energies 12, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Balcombe, P., Lewis, C. Decarbonising shipping. Energy Conv Mgmt 182, 72–88, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Pavlenko, N., Comer, B. Climate implications of LNG. ICCT, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Hall, D. LNG transition pathways. ICCT, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Vlaskos, S. Ammonia as marine fuel. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 161, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Acciaro, M., McKinnon, A. Electrification of port operations. Energy Policy 143, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Manoharan, Y., Hosseini, S.E. Hydrogen for maritime transport. Renew Sustain Energy Rev., 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Pan, Y., Birdsey, R.A. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science 333, 988–993, 2011. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• An Adaptive Joint Filtering Approach to Wireless Relay Network for Transmission Rate Maximization
• IoT-Integrated Mercury Substance Detection System for Cosmetic Product Safety
• Design and Implementation of Solar PV-Based Railway Microgrid for Linke Hofmann Busch Coaches
• Cost Control Techniques on Civil Engineering Projects in Oyo State, Nigeria
• Strength and Predictive Modeling of Corn Cob Ash Blended Concrete Using Multi-Output Artificial Neural Network Approach