A Systematic Review and Taxonomy of Bias Detection in Machine Learning for Scholarship Allocation in Educational Decision Systems

The rapid adoption of Machine Learning (ML) in educational decision-making, particularly scholarship allocation, has raised critical concerns about fairness, bias propagation, and institutional accountability. However, existing research on how bias is detected, measured, and mitigated in these systems remains fragmented across methods, domains, and evaluation practices. This study conducts a PRISMA-guided systematic review to explore machine learning-driven bias detection approaches in education and scholarship, integrating findings from Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and the ACM Digital Library. The synthesis examines bias variants, fairness metrics, methodological trends, and evaluation practices across selected studies. Findings show that representation and measurement bias dominate the literature, while label and deployment biases are less explored. Statistical and group fairness metrics are most commonly used, whereas causal inference and in-model fairness approaches remain underdeveloped. Major methodological limitations identified include the scarcity of high-quality datasets, inconsistent reporting practices, limited reproducibility, and inadequate evaluation of fairness across the entire model lifecycle. To address these issues, the study proposes a domain-specific taxonomy for scholarship allocation that structures fairness analysis across bias source, detection stage, method type, fairness metric, and educational context. The framework consolidates fragmented evidence and highlights research gaps in causal fairness, deployment monitoring, and longitudinal bias analysis.

Algorithmic bias detection, Educational resource allocation

1. Afreen, J., Mohaghegh, M., & Doborjeh, M. (2025). Systematic literature review on bias mitigation in generative AI. AI and Ethics, 5(5), 4789-4841. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Albaroudi, E., Mansouri, T., & Alameer, A. (2024). A comprehensive review of AI techniques for addressing algorithmic bias in job hiring. Ai, 5(1), 383-404. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alelyani, S. (2021). Detection and evaluation of machine learning bias. Applied Sciences, 11(14), 6271. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Alvarez, J. M., Colmenarejo, A. B., Elobaid, A., Fabbrizzi, S., Fahimi, M., Ferrara, A., ... & Ruggieri, S. (2024). Policy advice and best practices on bias and fairness in AI. Ethics and Information Technology, 26(2), 31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Baker, R. S., & Hawn, A. (2022). Algorithmic bias in education. International journal of artificial intelligence in education, 32(4), 1052-1092. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bali, B., Garba, E. J., Ahmadu, A. S., Takwate, K. T., & Malgwi, Y. M. (2024). Analysis of emerging trends in artificial intelligence for education in Nigeria. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 4(1), 110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-024-00163-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bali, B. (2025). Cognitively-informed explainable AI for education: Enhancing student engagement and transparent assessment through human-centered modeling. Journal of Social and Scientific Education, 2(3), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.58230/josse.v2i3.351 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bali, B. (2026). A novel context-aware intelligent learning framework for personalized education in developing countries. Next Research, 8, 101570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexres.2026.101570 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Barnes, E., & Hutson, J. (2024). Navigating the ethical terrain of AI in higher education: Strategies for mitigating bias and promoting fairness. In Forum for Education Studies (Vol. 2, No. 2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bhat, J. (2024). Responsible Machine Learning in Student-Facing Applications: Bias Mitigation & Fairness Frameworks. American International Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 6(1), 38-49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Boateng, O., & Boateng, B. (2025). Algorithmic bias in educational systems: Examining the impact of AI-driven decision making in modern education. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 25(1), 2012-2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Bogina, V., Hartman, A., Kuflik, T., & Shulner-Tal, A. (2022). Educating software and AI stakeholders about algorithmic fairness, accountability, transparency and ethics. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(3), 808-833. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Chan, C. K. Y. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 20(1), 38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Chinta, S. V., Wang, Z., Yin, Z., Hoang, N., Gonzalez, M., Quy, T. L., & Zhang, W. (2024). FairAIED: Navigating fairness, bias, and ethics in educational AI applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.18745. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Choraś, M., Pawlicki, M., Puchalski, D., & Kozik, R. (2020, June). Machine learning–the results are not the only thing that matters! what about security, explainability and fairness?. In International Conference on Computational Science (pp. 615-628). Cham: Springer International Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Corbett-Davies, S., Gaebler, J. D., Nilforoshan, H., Shroff, R., & Goel, S. (2023). The measure and mismeasure of fairness. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 24(312), 1-117. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Dritsas, E., & Trigka, M. (2025). Exploring the intersection of machine learning and big data: A survey. Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction, 7(1), 13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Du, M., Yang, F., Zou, N., & Hu, X. (2020). Fairness in deep learning: A computational perspective. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 36(4), 25-34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Fazelpour, S., & Danks, D. (2021). Algorithmic bias: Senses, sources, solutions. Philosophy Compass, 16(8), e12760. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Fazelpour, S., Lipton, Z. C., & Danks, D. (2022). Algorithmic fairness and the situated dynamics of justice. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 52(1), 44-60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Friedler, S. A., Scheidegger, C., Venkatasubramanian, S., Choudhary, S., Hamilton, E. P., & Roth, D. (2019, January). A comparative study of fairness-enhancing interventions in machine learning. In Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (pp. 329-338). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Gándara, D., Anahideh, H., Ison, M. P., & Picchiarini, L. (2024). Inside the black box: Detecting and mitigating algorithmic bias across racialized groups in college student-success prediction. AERA open, 10, 23328584241258741. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Garcia, A. C. B., Garcia, M. G. P., & Rigobon, R. (2024). Algorithmic discrimination in the credit domain: what do we know about it?. AI & society, 39(4), 2059-2098. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Ghani, R., Rodolfa, K. T., Saleiro, P., & Jesus, S. (2023, August). Addressing bias and fairness in machine learning: A practical guide and hands-on tutorial. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 5779-5780). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Huang, Y., Guo, J., Chen, W. H., Lin, H. Y., Tang, H., Wang, F., ... & Bian, J. (2024). A scoping review of fair machine learning techniques when using real-world data. Journal of biomedical informatics, 151, 104622. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Huang, F. (2022). FAI: Toward Fair Decision Making and Resource Allocation with Application to AI-Assisted Graduate Admission and Degree Completion. NSF Award Number 2147276. Directorate for Computer and Information Science and Engineering, 21(2147276), 47276. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Idowu, J.A. Debiasing Education Algorithms. Int J Artif Intell Educ 34, 1510–1540 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-023-00389-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Jones, G. P., Hickey, J. M., Di Stefano, P. G., Dhanjal, C., Stoddart, L. C., & Vasileiou, V. (2020). Metrics and methods for a systematic comparison of fairness-aware machine learning algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.03986. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Jui, T. D., & Rivas, P. (2024). Fairness issues, current approaches, and challenges in machine learning models. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 15(8), 3095-3125. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Kanwal, B., Shoukat, R. S., Rehman, S. U., Kundi, M., AlSaedi, T., & Alahmadi, A. (2024). A New Framework for Scholarship Predictor Using a Machine Learning Approach. Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing, 39(5). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Kesgin, K., Kiraz, S., Kosunalp, S., & Stoycheva, B. (2025). Beyond performance: Explaining and ensuring fairness in student academic performance prediction with machine learning. Applied Sciences, 15(15), 8409. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Kim, W., & Kim, H. (2025, June). Counterfactual fairness evaluation of machine learning models on educational datasets. In International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 88-103). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Lee, J., Hicke, Y., Yu, R., Brooks, C., & Kizilcec, R. F. (2024). The life cycle of large language models in education: A framework for understanding sources of bias. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(5), 1982-2002. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Li, L., Sha, L., Li, Y., Raković, M., Rong, J., Joksimovic, S., ... & Chen, G. (2023, March). Moral machines or tyranny of the majority? A systematic review on predictive bias in education. In LAK23: 13th international learning analytics and knowledge conference (pp. 499-508). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Madaio, M., Blodgett, S. L., Mayfield, E., & Dixon-Román, E. (2022). Beyond “fairness”: Structural (in) justice lenses on AI for education. In The ethics of artificial intelligence in education (pp. 203-239). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Mavrogiorgos, K., Kiourtis, A., Mavrogiorgou, A., Menychtas, A., & Kyriazis, D. (2024). Bias in machine learning: A literature review. Applied Sciences, 14(19), 8860. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM computing surveys (CSUR), 54(6), 1-35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Omughelli, D., Gordon, N., & Al Jaber, T. (2024). Fairness, bias, and ethics in AI: Exploring the factors affecting student performance. Journal of Intelligent Communication, 3(2), 100-110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Oneto, L., & Chiappa, S. (2020, April). Fairness in machine learning. In Recent trends in learning from data: Tutorials from the inns big data and deep learning conference (innsbddl2019) (pp. 155-196). Cham: Springer International Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Pagano, T. P., Loureiro, R. B., Lisboa, F. V., Peixoto, R. M., Guimarães, G. A., Cruz, G. O., ... & Nascimento, E. G. (2023). Bias and unfairness in machine learning models: a systematic review on datasets, tools, fairness metrics, and identification and mitigation methods. Big data and cognitive computing, 7(1), 15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Pessach, D., & Shmueli, E. (2022). A review on fairness in machine learning. ACM computing surveys (CSUR), 55(3), 1-44. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Pham, N., Do, M. K., Dai, T. V., Hung, P. N., & Nguyen-Duc, A. (2025). FAIREDU: A multiple regression-based method for enhancing fairness in machine learning models for educational applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 269, 126219. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Pham, N., Ngoc, H. P., & Nguyen-Duc, A. (2025). Fairness for machine learning software in education: A systematic mapping study. Journal of Systems and Software, 219, 112244. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Raftopoulos, G., Davrazos, G., & Kotsiantis, S. (2024). Fair and transparent student admission prediction using machine learning models. Algorithms, 17(12), 572. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Raftopoulos, G., Davrazos, G., & Kotsiantis, S. (2025). Evaluating fairness strategies in educational data mining: A comparative study of bias mitigation techniques. Electronics, 14(9), 1856. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Roshanaei, M. (2024). Towards best practices for mitigating artificial intelligence implicit bias in shaping diversity, inclusion and equity in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 29(14), 18959-18984. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Siddique, S., Haque, M. A., George, R., Gupta, K. D., Gupta, D., & Faruk, M. J. H. (2024). Survey on machine learning biases and mitigation techniques. Digital, 4(1), 1-68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Tizpaz-Niari, S., Kumar, A., Tan, G., & Trivedi, A. (2022, May). Fairness-aware configuration of machine learning libraries. In Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Software Engineering (pp. 909-920). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Van Giffen, B., Herhausen, D., & Fahse, T. (2022). Overcoming the pitfalls and perils of algorithms: A classification of machine learning biases and mitigation methods. Journal of Business Research, 144, 93-106. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Venkatasubbu, S., & Krishnamoorthy, G. (2022). Ethical considerations in AI addressing bias and fairness in machine learning models. Journal of Knowledge Learning and Science Technology ISSN: 2959-6386 (online), 1(1), 130-138. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Verger, M., Fan, C., Lallé, S., Bouchet, F., & Luengo, V. (2024). A comprehensive study on evaluating and mitigating algorithmic unfairness with the MADD metric. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 16(1), 365-409. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., & Russell, C. (2020). Bias preservation in machine learning: the legality of fairness metrics under EU non-discrimination law. W. Va. L. Rev., 123, 735. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Wei, X., Kumar, N., & Zhang, H. (2025). Addressing bias in generative AI: Challenges and research opportunities in information management. Information & Management, 62(2), 104103. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Williamson, B., Eynon, R., Knox, J., & Davies, H. (2023). Critical perspectives on AI in education: Political economy, discrimination, commercialization, governance and ethics. In Handbook of artificial intelligence in education (pp. 553-570). Edward Elgar Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Yan, Y., & Liu, H. (2025). Ethical framework for AI education based on large language models. Education and Information Technologies, 30(8), 10891-10909. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Zhang, F., Xing, W., Li, C., & Jiang, Y. (2026). Fair AI in educational predictions: A multi-group fairness approach using reinforcement learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 101074. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• What the Desert Fathers Teach Data Scientists: Ancient Ascetic Principles for Ethical Machine-Learning Practice
• Comparative Analysis of Some Machine Learning Algorithms for the Classification of Ransomware
• Comparative Performance Analysis of Some Priority Queue Variants in Dijkstra’s Algorithm
• Transfer Learning in Detecting E-Assessment Malpractice from a Proctored Video Recordings.
• Dual-Modal Detection of Parkinson’s Disease: A Clinical Framework and Deep Learning Approach Using NeuroParkNet