AI-Integrated Breast Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS): Image Acquisition Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)
Authors
Validus Institute Inc (USA)
Validus Institute Inc (USA)
Validus Institute Inc (USA)
Validus Institute Inc (USA)
Validus Institute Inc (USA)
Validus Institute Inc (USA)
Validus Institute Inc (USA)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.101100063
Subject Category: Health Science
Volume/Issue: 10/11 | Page No: 652-669
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-11-30
Accepted: 2025-12-07
Published: 2025-12-13
Abstract
This Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) outlines a standardized workflow for performing bilateral breast point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) examinations in an outpatient clinical setting. The purpose of the SOP is to reduce procedural variability, promote consistent high-quality imaging, and support patient safety during breast ultrasound screening. The protocol is intended for clinicians and trainees with foundational knowledge of ultrasound physics and breast anatomy who are working under appropriate supervision. Examinations are performed using the Butterfly iQ3 probe paired with the Butterfly App on a 10th-generation Apple iPad, selected for its portability, ease of use, and imaging performance comparable to conventional ultrasound systems. Real-time images are displayed through the app interface via USB-C connection, enabling efficient acquisition and review during scanning. This SOP provides a structured framework to guide breast POCUS acquisition and support evaluation of AI-assisted feasibility for breast ultrasound screening.
Keywords
AI-Integrated ,Breast , Point, Ultrasound
Downloads
References
1. American College of Radiology. (2023). ACR practice parameter for the performance of a breast ultrasound examination. ACR. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. (2022). AIUM practice parameter for the performance of a breast ultrasound examination. AIUM. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Berg, W. A., et al. (2021). Diagnostic imaging: Breast (3rd ed.). Elsevier. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Butterfly Network. (2023). Butterfly iQ user manual & clinical scanning guide. Butterfly Network Inc. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Evans, A., Trimboli, R. M., Athanasiou, A., Balleyguier, C., Baltzer, P. A., Bick, U., ... & European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI), with language review by Europa Donna–The European Breast Cancer Coalition. (2018). Breast ultrasound: recommendations for information to women and referring physicians by the European Society of Breast Imaging. Insights into imaging, 9(4), 449-461. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Oteibi, M., Tamimi, A., Abbas, K., Tamimi, G., Khazaei, D., Khajehee, B., & Khazaei, H. (2025). AI-Assisted Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) Vs. Mammography for Early Breast Cancer Detection: A Comparative Review. https://dx.doi.org/10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.10100000125 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Oteibi, M., Tamimi, A., Abbas, K., Tamimi, G., Khazaei, D., & Khazaei, H. (2025). Breast tumor ultrasound: Clinical applications, diagnostic features, and integration with AI. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science, 11(11), 518–527. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. https://doi.org/10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.100800034 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Oteibi, M., Tamimi, A., Abbas, K., Tamimi, G., Khazaei, D., & Khazaei, H. (2024). Advancing digital health using AI and machine learning solutions for early ultrasonic detection of breast disorders in women. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science, 11(9), 590–601. https://doi.org/10.51244/IJRSI.2024.11110039 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Oteibi, M., Khazaei, H., Abbas, K., Balaguru, B., Williams, A. R., & Etesami, F. (2025). Breast imaging and omics for non-invasive integrated classification (BIONIC). International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science, 10(8), 826–835. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. https://doi.org/10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.100800094 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Yang, L., Wang, S., & Zhang, L. (2020). Performance of ultrasonography screening for breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer, 20, 499. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-06992-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Measuring Waste of Patient Time in Health Care at Non-Digitized Hospital: An Observational Study in Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Bangladesh
- Reaffirming Clinical Confidence in Atorvastatin Therapy: A Digital Outreach Case Study from Tamil Nadu, India
- Clinical Manifestations and Therapeutic Response in a Patient with Hypothyroidism: A Case Report
- Eranda (Ricinus Communis) In Gridhrasi (Sciatica): Classical Rationale, Pharmacology and Clinical Evidence- A Narrative Literature Review
- Magnetotherapy in Pain Management: Mechanisms, Clinical Applications, and Future Perspectives – A Review