An Analytical Exploration of Construction Contract Terms from Legal Cases

Construction disputes are a commonality in the Malaysian construction industry. Previous researchers found that contractual issues are the main problem in construction disputes. It could also cause project delay, bad workmanship, and cost overruns if the construction contracts are not drafted properly. As such, the construction contract acts as the first security for the rights and responsibilities of the contracting parties. The construction contract in this study is based on general construction contracts, including both the main contract and subcontract, which govern the contractor's liabilities in construction. The researcher indicated that 6 sub-salient elements (Terminology, Lengthening and Consistency, Format and Presentation, Risk Allocation, Statutory Compliance, Completeness of Clauses), and a total of 11 salient elements in the construction contract in literature review which are “Certainty in Scope of Works”, “Terms with Industry Conventions and Shared Meaning”, “Unambiguous Words”, “Plain Language”, “Avoid Long Sentences and Redundant Information”, “Avoid Too Many Cross-references”, “Usage of Headings, Signage and Active Voice”, “Clear Illustration of Procedure and Process”, “Fair Risk Allocation”, “Not Contrary to the Statute”, and “Comprehensive with Essential Clauses”. In addition, an analysis of 14 construction contract-related cases within the Malaysian jurisdiction, identified through Lexis Advance, was conducted to examine the judicial recognition of these salient elements. The findings reveal that the inclusion of comprehensive and essential clauses is the most critical element in drafting an effective construction contract, as expressly stated provisions provide the strongest evidentiary basis for enforcing contractual claims.

Construction Contract, Terms, Malaysia

1. Adaku, E., Osei-Poku, V., Ottou, J. A., & Yirenkyi-Fianko, A. (2024). Contractor payment delays: a systematic review of current trends and future directions. Construction Innovation, 24(5), 1205–1227. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-12-2022-0317 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adams, K. A. (2013). A Manual of Style for Contract Drafting (3rd ed.). American Bar Association [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Adra, R., Lindsay, J., Northcott, E., & Espen, E. V. (2025, August 12). Allocation of risk in construction contracts. Global Arbitration Review. https://globalarbitrationreview.com/guide/the-guide-constructionarbitration/sixth-edition/article/allocation-of-risk-in-construction-contracts#footnote-16 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Adriaanse, J. (2017). Construction Contract Law: The Nature of Construction Contracts (4th ed.). Bloomsbury Publishing, 1-17, 1137009594 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Abdulrahman Kamal. (2024, June 1). Priority of Documents in Construction Contracts [LinkedIn]. LinkedIn. Retrieved January 5, 2026, from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/priority-documentsconstruction-contracts-abdulrahman-kamal-5csvf/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ahmed Yousry Akal. (2022). What Are the Readability Issues in Sub-Contracting’s Tender Documents? Buildings, 12(6), 839. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12060839 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Asian International Arbitration Centre (AIAC). (2023). Asian International Arbitration Centre (AIAC) Annual Report 2023: Revitalisation Unleashed. Asian International Arbitration Centre. https://admin.aiac.world/uploads/ckupload/ckupload_20231229123959_26.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Assaad, R. H., Elsayegh, A., Ali, G. G., Mohamad Abdul Nabi, & El-adaway, I. (2020). Back-to-Back Relationship under Standard Subcontract Agreements: Comparative Study. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 12(3). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000406 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ayunda Rizky Nur Rohmah & Nur Latifah. (2022). Replacement of ‘Delicious’ Expression: Denotative Connotative Meaning Analysi. Journal of Language and Literature. 10(2), 163-180. https://doi.org/10.35760/jll.2022.v10i2.7368 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ballesteros-Lintao, R., & Ameer Ali, N. A. N. (2022). Readability and comprehensibility of Malaysian construction contracts. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(15), 2649–2657. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2022.2084598 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. BuildForce Canada. (2023). Plain Language for Construction. https://oyapskilledtrades.ca/documents/assets/uploads/files/en/plain_language_for_trades.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Cambridge dictionary. (2025). Ambiguity. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/ambiguity [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Castro, M. F., Guccio, C., & Rizzo, I. (2023). “One-size-fits-all” public works contract does it better? An assessment of infrastructure provision in Italy. Journal of Policy Modeling, 45(5), 994–1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2023.07.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Chaar, M. (2018). CONSTRUCTION OF CONTRACTS: THE AMBIGUITY GATEWAY AND THE CURRENT STATE OF THE LAW. University of Western Australia Law Review, 44(1), 65. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/INFORMIT.444141207727042 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Chan, E. E., Nik-Bakht, M., & Han, S. (2021). Sources of Ambiguity in Construction Contract Documents, Reflected by Litigation in Supreme Court Cases. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)la.1943-4170.0000498 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Cheshire, G. C., Fifoot, C. H. S., & Furmston, M. (2012). Law of Contract - 16th ed. Oxford University Press 10.1093/he/9780199568345.001.0001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Construction Industry Development Board Malaysia (CIDB) Malaysia. (2023). Standard Terms of Construction Contract for Renovation and Small Projects (Stcc-Rsp 2015) between Client and Contractor. https://www.cidb.gov.my/eng/standard-terms-of-construction-contract-for-renovation-and-smallprojects/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Faber, P., Martinez, S. M. (2019). The Routledge Handbook of Spanish Translation Studies: Terminology (Chapter 14). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315520131 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Gamage, A. N. K. K., & Kumar, S. (2024). Review of Alternative Dispute Resolution Methods in Construction Projects. Saudi Journal of Engineering and Technology, 9(02), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.36348/sjet.2024.v09i02.007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Haapio, H. (2022). Visualisation in contract education and practice: The first 25 years. In: Allbon, E. & Perry-Kessaris, A. (eds.) Design inLegal Education, 203-217. Emerging Legal Education. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429021411-19 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Haron, R. C., Masrom, M. A. N., & Kamal, K. (2020). Assessing Causes of Contractual Disputes from Different Type of Condition of Contracts. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology. 11 (4), 45-49. https://doi.org/10.30880/ijscet.2021.11.04.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Iqbal, Z., & Hussain, A. (2025). Measuring Occupational Health and Safety Compliance in Construction: A Novel Scale Development Approach. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.32454.79688 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Juwita Radzi, & Noushad Ali Naseem Ameer Ali. (2023). “Meaning” in standard forms of construction contracts: A narrative literature review and a proposal. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2881(1), 050019. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0175229 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Klee, L. (2018). International Construction Contract Law (2nd ed.). John Eiley & Sons Ltd. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Koc, K., & Gurgun, A. P. (2021). Ambiguity factors in construction contracts entailing conflicts. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(5), 1946–1964. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-04-2020-0254 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Lee, J., Ham, Y., & Yi, J.-S. (2021). Construction Disputes and Associated Contractual Knowledge Discovery Using Unstructured Text-Heavy Data: Legal Cases in the United Kingdom. Sustainability, 13(16), 9403. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169403 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Matarneh, S. (2024). Construction Disputes Causes and Resolution Methods: A Case Study from a Developing Country. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 29(1), 139–161. https://doi.org/10.21315/jcdc-04-23 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Mehavarshni S., & Madhumitha C. (2023). Ambiguity in Statutes: How Courts Address and Resolve Uncertain Language. International Journal of Scientific Development and Research, 8(11), 2455-2631. https://ijsdr.org/papers/IJSDR2311077.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Meredith, Gerard Hornby, (2023). A Practical Guide to Drafting Construction Contracts: Essential Tips and Key Clauses [PowerPoint slides]. SlideShare. https://www.eckertseamans.com/app/uploads/Tab-8Meredith-Hornby.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Mohamed-Asem U. Abdul-Malak, Farah S. Demachkieh, & Kazem Y. Dhaini. (2023). Revoking the Exercised Termination of the Construction Contract: Implications and Lessons Learned. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1061/jladah.ladr-928 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Murdoch, J., & Hughes, W. (2001). Construction Contract: Law and Management (3rd ed.). Spon Press. https://freeassingments.yolasite.com/resources/CONSTRUCTION%20CONTRACTS%20LAW%20&% 20MANAGEMENT.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Nadar, A. (2023, October 12). The Contract: The Foundation of Construction Projects. Global Arbitration Review (GAR). https://globalarbitrationreview.com/guide/the-guide-construction-arbitration/fifthedition/article/the-contract-the-foundation-of-construction-projects [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Nor Marina Rosli, Nur Emma Mustaffa, & Hamizah Liyana Tajul Arifin. (2022). The Crucial Conditions and Attributes of Domestic Subcontract in Malaysian Construction Industry. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1067(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1067/1/012054 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Norazian Mohamad Yusuwan, Hamimah Adnan, Zul Zakiyuddin Ahmad Rashid, & Nor Azmi Bakhari. (2021). Resolving issues and disputes in Extension of Time (EoT) claim in the Malaysian construction industry. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 685(1), 012015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/685/1/012015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Osifo, E. O., Omumu, E. S., & Alozie, M. (2025). Contract Management in Construction Law: Mitigating Risks, Dispute Resolution, and Performance Enforcement. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 6(3), 5874–5890. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Othman, O. (2021). Assessment of Contract Terms and Conditions for Lump-sum Contracts [Master's Thesis, the American University in Cairo]. AUC Knowledge Fountain. https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/1654 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Palit, N., & Brint, A. (2020). The effect of risk aversion on the optimal project resource rate. European Journal of Operational Research, 287, 1092–1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.05.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Panov, A., Volkova, N., Panova, L., Sichko, D., & Petrenko, N. (2024). Alternative ways of resolving disputes in the field of contract law. Revista Amazonia Investiga, 13(76), 258–273. https://doi.org/10.34069/ai/2024.76.04.21 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Peterson, D. H. (2021, October 6). Advanced Legal Writing - Part 1 [Paper presentation]. Legal Education Society of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. https://www.lesaonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/2021Peterson-32211.1.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Radzi, J., & Qin, M. (2021, October 28-29). The impact of drafting styles on contract readability: An objective assessment of the New Zealand quantity surveying consultancy contract [Paper presentation]. Australasian Universities Building Education Association Conference, Deakin University, Australia. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356109536_The_impact_of_drafting_styles_on_contract_reada bility_An_objective_assessment_of_the_New_Zealand_quantity_surveying_consultancy_contract [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Radzi, J., & Noushad Ali Naseem Ameer Ali. (2023). “Meaning” in standard forms of construction contracts: A narrative literature review and a proposal. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2881(1), 050019. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0175229 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Rai, M & Loo, D. (2020, January 28). Construction Contracts - The Essential Terms & Past Lessons. Drew& Napier LLC. https://www.drewnapier.com/DrewNapier/media/DrewNapier/Construction-contractsThe-essential-terms-past-lessons-28Jan2020.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Raja Berema, R. K., Ismail, Z., Brahim, J., & Nordin, N. A. (2023). A Systematic Review of Existing Standard Form of Contract for Building Information Modeling (BIM) Public Projects in Malaysia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1217(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/17551315/1217/1/012006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Sara Farag, & Ahmed Mohammed Abdelalim. (2023). Construction Contracts’ Pricing According to Contractual Provisions and Risk Allocations and Maritime Transport. International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering Research, 11(1), 8–31. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7876040 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Sergeant, M., & Wieliczko, M. (2014). Construction Contract Variations (1st ed.). Informa Law from Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315774688 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Solo, A. (2025, September 14). Why Defining Key Terms Clearly in Contracts Protects Your Business: The Importance of Defining. Sprintlaw. https://sprintlaw.com.au/articles/why-defining-key-terms-clearlyin-contracts-protects-your-business-the-importance-of-defining/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Soo, G., & Cheng, P. (2022). Essentials of Contract Drafting and Negotiation for Construction Professionals. Hong Kong University Press. https://hkupress.hku.hk/image/catalog/pdfpreview/9789888754113.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Stone, R. (2009). The modern law of contract (8th ed.). Routledge-Cavendish. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Stone, R., & Devenney, J. (2025). The modern law of contract (15th ed.). Routledge-Cavendish. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Tsao, K. E., Zulkiflee Abdul-Samad, & Nur Mardhiyah Aziz. (2021). Negotiation for Managing Conflict in Construction Industry with Multicultural Context: A Systematic Review of Literature. Journal of Design and Built Environment, 21(3), 95–115. https://doi.org/10.22452/jdbe.vol21no3.7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Uff, J. (2017). Construction Law: Law and Practice Relating to the Construction Industry 12th ed (12th ed.). Sweet & Maxwell Ltd. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Waraich, R. S., Fayaz, M., & Zahid, H. (2022). Consent Theory and Adhesion Contract: A Critical Analysis of Contemporary Global Business Practices. Business & Economic Review, 14(1), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.22547/ber/14.1.4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Widjaja, G. (2024). Managing Legal Disputes through Alternative Disputes Resolution. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(3), 451–460. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i3.3347 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Yao, H., Chen, Y., & Tang, Y. (2024). Contract Violations in the Construction Projects: How Contractual Obligations are Reached Affects Contractual and Reputational Enforcement. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 7160–7172. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2023.3257883 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Zarabizan Bin Zakaria, Syuhaida Binti Ismail, & Aminah binti Md Yusof. (2022). An Overview of Comparison between Construction Contracts in Malaysia: The Roles and Responsibilities of Contract Administrator in Achieving Final Account Closing Success. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Informatics, 16, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.46300/91014.2022.16.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Zul Zakiyuddin Ahmad Rashid, & Ng, K. G. S. (2024). Guide on the CIDB Standard Form of Contract for Building Works (2022 Edition). CIDB Malaysia. https://www.cidb.gov.my/wpcontent/uploads/2024/10/GUIDE-FAQs-ON-THE-CIDB-SFOC-BUILDING-WORKS-2022-EditionPublished-October-2024.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Orientation and Mobility Training as a Core Component of Supported Employment for Employees with Visual Impairment
• Chamar Caste Movement and Its Leaders in District Bijnor (1900–1950 Ad)
• Influence of Menstrual Health Management on Mental Health of Adolescents in Thrissur District
• Echoes Beneath the Earth: Cultural and Spiritual Beliefs of Miners in the Mining Industry
• Dynamics of Doctoral Research Writing at a State College: Challenges, Strategies, and Influencing Factors