An Evaluation of the Sustainability and Role of the Kadiwa Center in Enhancing Urban Food Access and Farmer Empowerment in Tagaytay City

Authors

Olivarez College Tagaytay

International Institute of Rural Reconstruction (Philippines)

Ma. Sheila S. Anunciado

International Institute of Rural Reconstruction (Philippines)

Shanerisse Tamondong Jean Rizza A. Dela Cruz

International Institute of Rural Reconstruction (Philippines)

Joselito G. Dela Cruz

International Institute of Rural Reconstruction (Philippines)

MSIT Eloisa D. De Ocampo

International Institute of Rural Reconstruction (Philippines)

Cherry Lyn P. Sison

International Institute of Rural Reconstruction (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.11080070

Subject Category: Agriculture

Volume/Issue: 11/8 | Page No: 904-913

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-27

Accepted: 2026-08-01

Published: 2026-09-06

Abstract

(Introduction)This study evaluated the sustainability and role of the KADIWA ng Pangulo (KNP) Center in enhancing urban food access and farmer empowerment in Tagaytay City, Philippines. Rapid urbanization has transformed food systems in developing economies, creating challenges in affordability, accessibility, and producer inclusion. Anchored on the Push–Pull–Policy (PPP) framework of the World Vegetable Center (2021), this research examined how the KADIWA model addresses gaps between food supply and consumer demand through governance and market interventions. (Methodology) Using a convergent mixed-methods design, data were collected from 144 participants—including consumers, vendors, smallholder farmers, and program implementers—through surveys, in-depth interviews, and focus group discussions. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative narratives were thematically coded and triangulated to ensure analytic convergence. (Results) Results revealed that the KADIWA Center effectively improves food affordability and accessibility, with 73% of consumers finding the market very accessible and 90% showing strong loyalty due to freshness and price advantage. On the supply side, farmer-vendors gained steady but modest income (₱10,000–₱15,000 monthly) and increased market visibility, though constrained by high transportation costs and seasonal production losses. Policy-wise, 64.5% rated government support as excellent, yet coordination, promotion, and capacity-building gaps remain. The findings illustrate that while the program successfully operationalizes the Push (supply) and Pull (demand) dimensions, its long-term sustainability depends on stronger Policy mechanisms, including logistics support, farmer training, and institutionalized governance. (Discussion) Overall, the study contributes new knowledge on localized food system resilience, demonstrating that KADIWA functions as a transitional hybrid model that bridges community-based agriculture and urban consumer demand. Its implications reinforce the pursuit of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 2, 8, 11, and 17, promoting inclusive, equitable, and sustainable urban food systems.

Keywords

KADIWA ng Pangulo, food access, farmer empowerment, Push–Pull–Policy framework

Downloads

References

1. Balleta, R., Briones, R., & Habito, C. (2022). Food security and agricultural market integration in the Philippines. Philippine Institute for Development Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Battersby, J., & Watson, V. (2019). Urban food systems governance and poverty in African cities. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Béné, C., Fanzo, J., Prager, S. D., et al. (2022). The future of food systems in developing countries: The need for equity and resilience. Global Food Security, 33, 100636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2022.100636 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Briones, R. M., Cervantes, R. D., & Habito, C. F. (2021). Urban food security and local market linkages in the Philippines. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, 18(2), 1–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cabaraban, M. T., Villanueva, R. C., & Dela Cruz, J. R. (2022). Gender roles in smallholder agriculture: Evidence from Southern Luzon. Philippine Journal of Rural Development, 44(1), 51–66. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research(3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Department of Agriculture [DA]. (2023). KADIWA ng Pangulo Program Overview. Quezon City: DA Public Information Service. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Department of Science and Technology–Philippine Council for Health Research and Development [DOST–PCHRD]. (2017). National ethics guidelines for health and health related research. Manila: DOST–PCHRD. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Etikan, I., & Bala, K. (2017). Sampling and sampling methods. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 5(6), 215–217. https://doi.org/10.15406/bbij.2017.05.00149 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Food and Agriculture Organization [FAO]. (2020). The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2020: Transforming food systems for affordable healthy diets. Rome: FAO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Global Nutrition Report. (2021). The state of global nutrition 2021. Bristol: Development Initiatives. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hoang, T. T., Nguyen, L. M., & Pham, H. V. (2023). Urban–rural food system integration in Southeast Asia: Lessons from Vietnam’s peri-urban agriculture. Journal of Asian Development Studies, 9(3), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Philippine Institute for Development Studies [PIDS]. (2022). Policy issues in ensuring affordable nutritious diets in Philippine cities (Policy Note No. 2022-14). Quezon City: PIDS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Philippine Statistics Authority [PSA]. (2023). Household food security and agricultural labor statistics 2023. Quezon City: PSA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Reardon, T., Timmer, C. P., & Minten, B. (2022). Modern food supply chains and the rural–urban transformation in Asia. World Development, 158, 105990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105990 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Teng, P., Shafiee-Jood, M., & Goh, E. (2022). Transforming food systems in Asia: Lessons for resilient urban markets. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, 9(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.341 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific [UNESCAP]. (2023). Resilient and inclusive food systems in Asia–Pacific. Bangkok: UNESCAP. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. World Vegetable Center [WorldVeg]. (2021). Push–Pull–Policy for healthy diets: A framework for sustainable food systems in Asia. Tainan, Taiwan: World Vegetable Center. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles