An Impact of Classroom Seating Arrangements on Postgraduate Learning: Based on the 3D Model of Design, Discipline, and Dynamic Involvement

In this study, comparisons will be made between graduate students' reactions to semicircle seating and row seating, and an exploration will be made of the implications of each seating arrangement for participation, engagement, and democratic learning. This study will apply an evaluation of learning based on a 3D learning model that includes design, discipline, and participation. The primary data was collected from postgraduate students using a structured Google Forms survey. The research was descriptive in nature and centered on the meanings, experiences, and preferences of students in relation to seating arrangement configurations. In the questionnaire, students were asked questions concerning visibility of the teacher, interaction with other students, opportunity to speak with other students, degree of comfort to share ideas, and opportunity to work with other people. Most postgraduates reported a semicircular configuration of seating to be preferred to the conventional row setting. They indicated an improvement in the view of both the teacher and teaching aids, and thus understanding of a discussion topic was facilitated. Semi-circle seating made students talk more easily. It sparked more class discussion and made the room feel inclusive. It felt more democratic, one student said, and several others also said they now were more comfortable sharing their own thoughts in lectures and even classes. Some students mentioned limited classroom space for larger groups, yet they still preferred semi-circle seating. Participants said strong engagement and interaction outweighed the study’s limits. The study links semi-circle seating for postgraduates to stronger engagement, more participation, and better group learning. In grad seminars, flexible seating helps students join talks and decisions as equals. It helps instructors choose methods that boost participation and learning.

seating arrangement, semi-circle seating, postgraduate students, classroom engagement.

1. Astuti, K. W., Suarnajaya, I. W., & Suputra, P. E. D. (2020). A case study of the seating arrangement of the eighth grade students. Journal of Educational Research, 4(2), 81–94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Byers, T., Imms, W., & Hartnell-Young, E. (2021). Teacher and student perspectives on flexible learning spaces and classroom design. Learning Environments Research, 24(3), 1–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Plaut, V. C., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2022). Designing classrooms to maximize student achievement, belonging, and participation. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 9(1), 56–63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Camacho, M. (2024). Take a Seat: The Impact of Three Classroom Seating Arrangements on Individual Student Performance. Educational Studies Review, 8, 1–55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Fernandez-Rio, J., Cecchini, J. A., & Mendez-Gimenez, A. (2023). Cooperative learning and classroom layout: Effects on student interaction and academic performance. Teaching and Teacher Education, 118, 103820. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Haghighi, M. M., & Jusan, M. M. (2012). Exploring Students Behavior on Seating Arrangements in Learning Environment: A Review. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 36, 287–294. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study