An Integrated Community Empowerment Model for the Minang Saiyo Padang Pariaman Entrepreneurial Diaspora in Malaysia
Authors
Department of Fisheries Product Technology, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, Gorontalo (Indonesia)
Department of English Literature, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, DKI Jakarta (Indonesia)
Department of Digital Business, Institut Teknologi Bisnis Riau, Riau (Indonesia)
Department of Geography Education, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Aceh (Indonesia)
Department of Geography Education, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Aceh (Indonesia)
Department of Guidance and Counseling, Universitas Negeri Medan, Sumatera Utara (Indonesia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.11050201
Subject Category: Development Studies
Volume/Issue: 11/5 | Page No: 2448-2459
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-05-20
Accepted: 2026-05-26
Published: 2026-06-16
Abstract
This community service initiative presents the design and implementation of an integrated empowerment model for the Minang Saiyo Padang Pariaman diaspora community in Malaysia. Drawing on a participatory action research (PAR) framework, the program engaged 63 participants across six months through five interconnected disciplinary components: food processing technology, digital literacy and communication, digital business management, mental health and counseling, and geography education. A mixed-methods evaluation design employing pre-test/post-test instruments and qualitative methods (focus group discussions and exit interviews) was used to assess outcomes. Results indicate statistically meaningful improvements across all domains: food processing knowledge scores increased by a mean of 62.4%, digital marketing self-efficacy rose from 23% to 79%, formal business record-keeping adoption increased from 31% to 71%, psychological distress rates declined from 38% to 19%, and geographical knowledge scores improved by 54.7%. Beyond domain-specific gains, participants demonstrated enhanced community cohesion and initiated self-organized peer support and cooperative structures. The integrated model confirms that holistic, multidisciplinary interventions addressing both economic and psychosocial dimensions produce synergistic outcomes that exceed the sum of their individual components, offering a replicable framework for diaspora community empowerment in Southeast Asia and beyond.
Keywords
community empowerment; diaspora entrepreneurship
Downloads
References
1. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Berry, J. W., Phinney, J. S., Sam, D. L., & Vedder, P. (Eds.). (2006). Immigrant youth in cultural transition: Acculturation, identity, and adaptation across national contexts. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. European Commission. (2017). DigComp 2.1: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/444455 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Herder and Herder. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Hugo, G. (2007). Population geography. Progress in Human Geography, 31(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132507073944 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Huda, M., Alyani, N., & Sabani, N. (2020). Community empowerment through multidisciplinary collaboration: Reflections on Indonesian higher education service. International Journal of Community Development and Management Studies, 4(1), 25–39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. International Labour Organization. (2019). Women in business and management: A global survey of enterprises. ILO Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 559–603). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Kessler, R. C., Andrews, G., Colpe, L. J., Hiripi, E., Mroczek, D. K., Normand, S. L. T., Walters, E. E., & Zaslavsky, A. M. (2002). Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychological Medicine, 32(6), 959–976. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291702006074 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Naim, M. (1979). Merantau: Minangkabau voluntary migration. Gadjah Mada University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. National Geographic Society. (2012). Road map for 21st century geography education. National Geographic Society. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Nento, W. R., Manteu, S. H., & Habibie, S. A. (2024). Education on the Implementation of Sanitation and Hygiene in Fishery Product Processing MSMEs in Kwandang District. Abdi Insani Journal, 10(4), 2497–2504. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Portes, A., Haller, W., & Guarnizo, L. E. (2002). Transnational entrepreneurs: An alternative form of immigrant economic adaptation. American Sociological Review, 67(2), 278–298. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088896 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Rahayu, R., & Day, J. (2015). Determinant factors of e-commerce adoption by SMEs in developing countries: Evidence from Indonesia. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 142–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.423 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Rappaport, J. (1987). Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: Toward a theory for community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 15(2), 121–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00919275 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Ray, K. (2016). The migrant’s table: Meals and memories in Bengali-American households. Temple University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Shepherd, D. A. (2003). Learning from business failure: Propositions of grief recovery for the self-employed. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 318–328. https://doi.org/10.2307/30040715 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Townsend, R. F., & Townsend, J. (2004). Towards participatory research. In Participatory rural appraisal: Principles and methods (pp. 1–22). Intermediate Technology Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Zimmerman, M. A. (2000). Empowerment theory: Psychological, organizational and community levels of analysis. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology (pp. 43–63). Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- An Exploration of Stakeholders Perceived Mitigation Measures for Addressing Sanitation Challenges in George Compound in Lusaka Zambia
- Public Participation in Sustainable Development Programs: Examining Public Participation Methods and Levels at Pustaka Negeri Sarawak
- Responding to Climate Change through Livelihood Diversification: Implications of Household Economic Well-Being in Coastal Greater Accra
- Teacher Character Development Through Virtue and Eudaimonia: Insights from Nominal Group Technique (NGT)
- Transformation of Muslim Friendly Hospitality: An Overview of Shariah Compliant Tourism Development in Malaysia