Appraisal of Safety Culture among Construction Workers in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria

This study assessed the safety culture among selected construction companies in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. A cross-sectional descriptive multi-case study design was adopted. The target population comprised construction workers in Akwa Ibom State, while four construction companies were purposively selected as the study cases. A total of 40 workers, comprising 16 supervisors/managers and 24 office/technical workers, participated in the study. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire containing 11 safety-culture statements measured on a five-point Likert scale ranging from Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree. Descriptive statistics, including frequencies, percentages and weighted mean scores, were used to analyse the data. The findings revealed an overwhelmingly positive perception of safety culture among the respondents. Supervisors/managers recorded an overall mean score of approximately 4.84, while office/technical workers recorded an overall mean of approximately 4.69. Among supervisors/managers, the highest scores were recorded for the existence of a safety policy and management commitment to safety (5.00 each), while the lowest was for sharing and learning from incidents (4.63). Among office/technical workers, teamwork recorded the highest mean score (4.88), while organisational commitment to personnel training recorded the lowest (4.58). No respondent selected Strongly Disagree or Disagree for any of the assessed items. The findings suggest that the selected construction companies have generally strong safety-culture characteristics, particularly in management commitment, teamwork, safety communication, safety rules, worker involvement, incident investigation and the prioritisation of safety over production pressure. However, the small sample size, purposive sampling technique and inclusion of only four companies limit generalisation of the findings. The study recommends continuous strengthening of safety training, worker participation, incident learning, hazard reporting and safety leadership. Larger studies involving more construction companies and probability-based sampling are recommended to enhance generalisability.

Safety culture; construction industry; construction workers; safety management; safety performance; Akwa Ibom State; Nigeria; multi-case study.

1. International Labour Organization. (2022). Safety and health in construction: ILO code of practice (Rev. ed.). International Labour Office. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. International Labour Organization. (2022). ILO adopts a revised code of practice on safety and health in construction. International Labour Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Zhou, Z., Goh, Y. M., & Li, Q. (2021). Measuring safety climate in the construction industry: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 13(19), 10603. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910603 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Edem, I. E., & Akinsola, B. (2022). An approach to assessing human factors related occupational safety using behavioural observation-based indicators: The case of a construction site in Nigeria. Engineering and Applied Science Research, 49(2), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.14456/easr.2022.16 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Xia, N., Ding, S., Ling, T., & Tang, Y. (2024). Safety climate in construction: A systematic literature review. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(1), 1–25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Xu, J., Cheung, C., Manu, P., & Ejohwomu, O. (2023). Implementing safety leading indicators in construction: Toward a proactive approach to safety management. Safety Science, 157, 105929. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105929 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Moda, H. M., Ofodile, N., Zailani, B. M., Abubakar, M., & Ibrahim, Y. M. (2023). Management support as a critical success factor (CSF) for changing workers' safety attitude: A case of the Nigerian construction industry. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(15), 2551–2557. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2022.2077084 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Abubakar, M. A., Zailani, B. M., Abdullahi, M., & Auwal, A. M. (2022). Potential of adopting a resilient safety culture toward improving the safety performance of construction organizations in Nigeria. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 20(5), 1236–1256. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-09-2020-0354 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Esitikot, E. L., Ofon, U. A., Tom, V. I., Akpan,F. C. & Emmanuel, I. (2026). Cross-Sectional Assessment of Fire Safety Awareness Among Petrol and LPG Filling Stations Operators in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, 13(1), 927-945. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. https://doi.org/10.51244/IJRSI.2026.13010081 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Esitikot, E. L., Awak, E. R., Ofon, U. A., Echebiri, P. C., & Akpan, B. O. (2025). Cross-sectional assessment of the safety culture in the public health sector of Akwa Ibom State of Nigeria. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, 12(6), 1608–1619. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. https://doi.org/10.51244/IJRSI.2025.12060013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. International Organization for Standardization. (2018). ISO 45001:2018 occupational health and safety management systems—Requirements with guidance for use. ISO [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Abukhashabah, E., Summan, A., & Balkhyour, M. (2021). A review of construction safety climate: Definitions, factors, relationship with safety behaviour and research agenda. Safety Science, 142, 105391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105391 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Alruqi, W. M., Hallowell, M. R., & Techera, U. (2018). Safety climate dimensions and their relationship to construction safety performance: A meta-analytic review. Safety Science, 109, 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.05.019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Manu, P., Emuze, F., Saurin, T. A., Hadikusumo, B. H. W., Mahamadu, A.-M., & Fong, D. (2021). An investigation of safety climate in Chinese major construction projects. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(8), 1410–1421. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2021.1972385 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Feng, Y., & Trinh, M. T. (2019). Developing resilient safety culture for construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(3), 04019069. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001612 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Choi, B., & Lee, S. (2021). Exploring the relationship between safety climate and worker safety behavior on building construction sites in Taiwan. Sustainability, 13(6), 3326. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063326 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Cooper, M. D. (2000). Towards a model of safety culture. Safety Science, 36(2), 111–136. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00035-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. (2023). Construction: Safety and health in construction. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. International Labour Organization. (2024). Construction. International Labour Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Muktar, M., & Chinyio, E. (2021). Studies on current health and safety practices and their impact on accidents on Nigerian construction sites. Advanced Aspects of Engineering Research, 8, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/aaer/v8/1366 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Abina, O. G., Ogunbayo, B. F., & Aigbavboa, C. O. (2023). Enabling technologies of health and safety practices in the fourth industrial revolution: Nigerian construction industry perspective. Frontiers in Built Environment, 9, Article 1233028. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2023.1233028 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Adetunji, K., Misnan, M. S., Ismail, M. Z., Abdul Rahim, F. N., & Abdul-Samad, Z. (2024). Approaches to improving occupational health and safety of the Nigerian construction industry. In Occupational health and safety—Some contemporary challenges. IntechOpen. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.113011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Esitikot, E. L., Ekpo, K. I., Ekong, A. E., Umoh, M. U., Ofon, U. A., Benson, I. (2026). Nigerian Public Safety Threat: Exorcising the “Witchcraft” of Recurring Safety Incidents. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), 13(15), https://doi.org/10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1315PH00159 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Afolabi, A. O., Ojelabi, R. A., Tunji-Olayeni, P. F., & Adewale, B. A. (2021). Factors influencing safety behaviour of construction workers in Nigeria. International Journal of Construction Management, 21, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Aidoo, I., Fugar, F., Adinyira, E., & Ansah, N. B. (2022). Understanding the concept of resilience in construction safety management systems. In Climate emergency–Managing, building, and delivering the Sustainable Development Goals: Selected proceedings from the International Conference of Sustainable Ecological Engineering Design for Society (SEEDS 2020) (pp. 217–233). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76091-0_14 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Goh, Y. M., & Chua, S. (2020). Safety climate factors in construction – A literature review. Policy and Practice in Health and Safety, 18(2), 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/14773996.2020.1777799 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Goldenhar, L. M., Hecker, S., & Schwatka, N. V. (2016). Defining and measuring safety climate: A review of the construction industry literature. Journal of Safety Research, 56, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2015.12.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Cooper, M. D. (2000). Towards a model of safety culture. Safety Science, 36(2), 111–136. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00035-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. International Atomic Energy Agency. (2020). Leadership and management for safety. IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GSG-12. International Atomic Energy Agency. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Reason, J. (1997). Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Ashgate. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Xu, J., Cheung, C., Manu, P., & Ejohwomu, O. (2023). Implementing safety leading indicators in construction: Toward a proactive approach to safety management. Safety Science, 157, 105929. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105929 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Ayangade, J. A., & Ikpo, I. J. (2021). Safety management practices of construction organisations in Nigeria. American Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 9(5), 203–211. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajcea-9-5-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Feng, Y., & Trinh, M. T. (2019). Developing resilient safety culture for construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(3), 04019069. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.00016 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. International Labour Organization. (2022). Guidelines on occupational safety and health management systems: ILO-OSH 2001. International Labour Office. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Onubi, H. O., Yusof, N. A., & Hassan, A. S. (2021). Perceived COVID-19 safety risk and safety behavior on construction sites: Role of safety climate and firm size. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(11), 04021157. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002201 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Reason, J. (1997). Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Ashgate. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Reason, J. (2000). Human error: Models and management. BMJ, 320(7237), 768–770. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7237.768 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Al-Bayati, A. J., Abudayyeh, O., Fredericks, T. K., & Butt, S. E. (2020). Safety climate perceptions in the construction industry of Saudi Arabia: The current situation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18), 6717. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186717 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Oke, A. E., Aigbavboa, C. O., & Thwala, W. D. (2024). Factors influencing safety behaviours of construction tradesmen. International Journal of Construction Management. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2024.2325750 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Ugwu, T. P., Nwaichi, E. O., & Patricks-E, C. (2021). Evaluation of safety performance of Nigerian construction industry: A case study of the Niger Delta Region. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports, 27(2), 94–103. https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2021/v27i230362 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Federal Republic of Nigeria, Federal Ministry of Labour and Employment. (2024). National policy on occupational safety and health. Federal Ministry of Labour and Employment. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Setia, M. S. (2016). Methodology series module 3: Cross-sectional studies. Indian Journal of Dermatology, 61(3), 261–264. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.182410 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Wang, X., & Cheng, Z. (2023). Cross-sectional studies: Strengths, weaknesses, and recommendations. Chest, 163(5), 1194–1201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2023.03.009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Aggarwal, R., & Ranganathan, P. (2019). Study designs: Part 2—Descriptive studies. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 10(1), 34–36. https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.PICR_154_18 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. Guilford Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. [Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Moser, A., & Korstjens, I. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 9–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. K. (2015). Likert scale: Explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Sullivan, G. M., & Artino, A. R., Jr. (2013). Analyzing and interpreting data from Likert-type scales. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 5(4), 541–542. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-5-4-18 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Taherdoost, H. (2016). Validity and reliability of the research instrument: How to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 5(3), 28–36. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach's alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48, 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Ursachi, G., Horodnic, I. A., & Zait, A. (2015). How reliable are measurement scales? External factors with indirect influence on reliability estimators. Procedia Economics and Finance, 20, 679–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00123-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. World Medical Association. (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA, 310(20), 2191–2194. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. National Commission for Science and Technology. (2020). National code of health research ethics. Federal Ministry of Health, Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

78. American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychological Association. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Measuring Waste of Patient Time in Health Care at Non-Digitized Hospital: An Observational Study in Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Bangladesh
• Reaffirming Clinical Confidence in Atorvastatin Therapy: A Digital Outreach Case Study from Tamil Nadu, India
• Clinical Manifestations and Therapeutic Response in a Patient with Hypothyroidism: A Case Report
• Eranda (Ricinus Communis) In Gridhrasi (Sciatica): Classical Rationale, Pharmacology and Clinical Evidence- A Narrative Literature Review
• Magnetotherapy in Pain Management: Mechanisms, Clinical Applications, and Future Perspectives – A Review