Arriving To Form With Emotive Aspects from Design Perspective (With Case Studies)
Authors
Accessory Design Department, National Institute of Fashion Technology, Bhopal (India)
Accessory Design Department, National Institute of Fashion Technology, Bhopal (India)
Accessory Design Department, National Institute of Fashion Technology, Bhopal (India)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.11060171
Subject Category: Fashion Design
Volume/Issue: 11/6 | Page No: 2251-2267
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-06-17
Accepted: 2026-06-22
Published: 2026-07-06
Abstract
The way human eye and brain coordinate to process the stimuli of visual forms it follows the interactive paradigm of perceptual understanding, visceral feeling as well as cognition (Solso, R, L 1996).
It is realized that every tangible objects due to their physical aspects have their own intangible dynamism. They are a medium for expression which are intended to be perceived by the audience in objectified way. The research focusses on the significance of communicating through forms in design application. The study is purely about form and its objectified emotive traits. It doesn’t address colour, material, finish, ergonomics, functionality and experience, with respect to forms.
Various non-linear divergent approaches were adopted to generate ideas and possibilities to communicate the visual force or expression, stimulating through forms. Convergent tools were used time and again to authenticate the visual reciprocity of the form and to obliterate any kind of subjectivity.
Keywords
Form, physical aspect, emotive trait, synectics, removal of mental blocks, form appreciation and communication, form generation.
Downloads
References
1. Solso, R. L 1996, “Cognition & the Visual Arts,” Published by: MIT Press, ISBN-10: 0262691868, ISBN-13: 978-0262691864, pp 11- 149. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Charlotte and Fiell, P 2007, “Design Now!” Published by: Taschen GmbH, Hohenzollern ring, ISBN 978-3-8228-5267-5, PP 6-412. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. 2025, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/form [17th Jun 2025, 08.55 AM]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. 2018, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/form [17th Jun 2025, 09.11 AM]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. 2025, https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/extruded [17th Jun 2025, 10.07 AM]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Mittelholzer, M 2024, “A Detailed Study of the Classification of Platonic Solids,” Bachelor Thesis, Department of Mathematics, ETH Z¨urich, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich Source: https://people.math.ethz.ch/~acannas/Student_Papers/BSc_Theses/2024, [12th Jun 2025, 06.05 PM]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Bérczi, S 2000, “From the periodic system of Platonic and Archimedean solids and tessellations to the 4d regular polyhedra and tessellations (with extension to some 5d polytopes),” Journal: Symmetry: Culture and Science, Volume 11, ISSN 0865-4824, pp 125-137. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Jain, S, Saxena, S, and Srivastava, A 2024, “Impact of Built Shape, Forms and Spaces on Human Psychology,” Published in: International Journal of Architectural Design and Planning, Volume 2, Issue 1, DOI (Journal): 10.37591/IJADP, pp 9-17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Norman, D, A 2004, “Emotional Design-Why we love (or Hate) everyday things,” Publisher: Basic Books, USA, ISBN-10: 0465051367, ISBN-13: 978-0465051366, pp 3-224. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Kay, P., & Kempton, W. 1984, “What is the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis?” Published by: American anthropologist, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 65–79, Source: JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/679389 [9th July 2025]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Frothingham M, B, 2023, “Sapir–Whorf hypothesis (Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis),” Published by: Simply Psychology, London, Source: https://www.simplypsychology.org/sapir-whorf-hypothesis.html [9th July 2025]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Jones, C, J 1970, ‘Design Methods’, Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York and Chichester, ISBN 0-471-28496-3, pp 190- 358. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Machado, R 1995, “Monolithic Architecture,” Publisher: Prestel Pub, ISBN-10: 9783791316093, ISBN-13: 978-3791316093, pp 1-155 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Osborn, A, F 1963, “Applied Imagination,” Publisher: Charles Scribner's Sons, New York, ASIN: B000H5HJBQ, pp 32- 218. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Althammer, A, et.al. 2023, “Systemic review of age brackets in pediatric emergency medicine literature and the development of a universal age classification for pediatric emergency patients - the Munich Age Classification System (MACS),” BMC Emerg Med. 2023 Jul 25;23(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12873-023-00851-5. Erratum in: BMC Emerg Med. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. 2024 Aug 9;24(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01064-0. PMID: 37491219; PMCID: PMC10369835. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Edwards, B 2008, “Drawing on the right side of the brain,” Publisher: Harper Collins, London, ISBN 9780007116454, pp 1-185. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. 2025, “Roger Wolcott Sperry,” Source: https://www.britannica.com/science/split-brain-syndrome [14th July 2025]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Aviña, G.E. et al. 2018, “The Art of Research: A Divergent/Convergent Thinking Framework and Opportunities for Science-Based Approaches.” In: Subrahmanian, E., Odumosu, T., Tsao, J. (eds) Engineering a Better Future. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91134-2_14, pp 167-186. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Arnheim, R 2004, “Art and Visual Perception - A Psychology of the Creative Eye,” Published by: University of California Press; 2nd edition, ISBN-10: 9780520243835, ISBN-13: 978-0520243835, pp 410-463. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]