Artificial Intelligence in Sacred Text Analysis: A Survey of Methodologies and Applications

Authors

Keyur Sameer Mahajan

Dept. of Information Technology, PICT (India)

Ali Abbas Gazge

Dept. of Information Technology, PICT (India)

Tanmayi Prakash Chaure

Dept. of Information Technology, PICT (India)

Neel Patel Mitulkumar

Dept. of Information Technology, PICT (India)

Prof. Rachana Karnavat

Dept. of Information Technology, PICT (India)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.11060141

Subject Category: Artificial Intelligence

Volume/Issue: 11/6 | Page No: 1848-1854

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-04-18

Accepted: 2026-04-23

Published: 2026-07-02

Abstract

The past decade has witnessed a remarkable convergence of artificial intelligence (AI) and the scholarly study of sacred texts. This paper offers a critical survey of AI-based sacred text analysis, drawing on studies involving the Bhagavad Gita, the Quran, and the Bible. It reviews approaches ranging from lexicon-based sentiment analysis and topic modeling to transformer-based models such as BERT, and it examines where these methods succeed and where they fall short. A central argument of the paper is that sacred texts cannot be treated as ordinary sentiment datasets because they are culturally embedded, symbolically rich, and theologically nuanced. Rather than claiming empirical validation beyond what is reported in the literature reviewed, this paper synthesizes prior work and proposes a conceptual framework built on interpretive partnership, methodological transparency, and domain-informed training. The study contributes a more careful and responsible perspective on the use of AI in spiritually sensitive domains.

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing, Sacred Text Analysis, Sentiment Analysis, Digital Humanities, BERT, Hermeneutics

Downloads

References

1. Alhawarat, M., Hegazi, M., & Hilal, I. (2015). Revisiting k-means and topic modeling, a comparison study to cluster Arabic documents. IEEE Access, 3, 2041–2054. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bender, E. M., & Koller, A. (2020). Climbing towards NLU: On meaning, form, and understanding in the age of data. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 5185–5198). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.463 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Burrows, J. (2002). Delta: A measure of stylistic difference and a guide to likely authorship. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 17(3), 267–287. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/17.3.267 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chandra, R., & Kulkarni, V. (2022). Semantic and sentiment analysis of selected Bhagavad Gita translations using BERT-based language framework. IEEE Access, 10, 21291–21315. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3154258 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Devlin, J., Chang, M. W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019). BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. Proceedings of NAACL-HLT 2019 (pp. 4171–4186). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N19-1423 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Felipe-Ruiz, A. (2024). Lexical, sentiment and correlation analysis of sacred writings: A tale of cultural influxes and different ways to interpret reality. Natural Language Processing Journal, 9, Article 100121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlp.2024.100121 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Listiyono, S., Budiarso, Z., Susilowati, S., & Windarto, A. P. (2024). Comprehensive sentiment analysis of religious content: Naive Bayes algorithm model. Jurnal Media Informatika Budidarma, 8(1), 602–611. https://doi.org/10.30865/mib [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Nandan, A. D. M., Godbole, I., Kapparad, P., & Bhattacharjee, S. (2025). Comparative analysis of religious texts: NLP approaches to the Bible, Quran, and Bhagavad Gita. Coling-Rel Proceedings. Association for Computational Linguistics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Nath, S., Das, U., & Ghosh, D. (2024). A religious sentiment detector based on machine learning to provide meaningful analysis of religious texts. In K. Dasgupta et al. (Eds.), Computational Intelligence in Communications and Business Analytics. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48876-4_13 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Smith, J. (2021). Reflective AI in the humanities: Toward a framework for responsible computational text analysis. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 15(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Vora, M., Blau, T., Kachhwal, V., Solo, A. M. G., & Chandra, R. (2024). Large language model for Bible sentiment analysis: Sermon on the Mount. arXiv:2401.00689. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.00689 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles