Barriers for Effective Adaptation of Online Psychological Services by Clients (Particularly Young Adults) in Harare Urban.

This article examines the barriers that hinder the successful adoption of online psychological services, emphasizing the perspectives of clients. While digital mental healthcare has expanded in response to technological advances and growing demand for accessible support, clients continue to face significant challenges that limit engagement and satisfaction. Common obstacles include unreliable internet connectivity, concerns about privacy and data security, and doubts about the confidentiality of therapeutic exchanges. Additionally, the absence of in-person interaction often reduces the sense of personal connection, leaving clients uncertain about the effectiveness of remote therapy. These issues directly influence clients’ willingness to participate, the perceived outcomes of sessions, and overall satisfaction with online services. Through a detailed literature review and quantitative analysis, this study identifies and evaluates the client-cantered hindrances that obstruct the adaptation of online therapy. By foregrounding the client experience, the research aims to inform strategies that enhance delivery, foster trust, and improve the accessibility and quality of digital mental health care.

Hindrance On Adaptation Of Online Therapy Services

1. Akbulut-Bailey, A. Y., Motwani, J., & Smedley, E. M. (2021). When Lean and Six Sigma converge: A case study of a successful implementation of Lean Six Sigma at an aerospace company. International Journal of Technology Management. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Akbulut-Bailey, Asli & Motwani, Jaideep & Smedley, Everett. (2012). When Lean and Six Sigma converge: A case study of a successful implementation of Lean Six Sigma at an aerospace company. Int. J. of Technology Management. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Al Owad, A., Karim, M. A., & Ma, L. (2019). Integrated Lean Six Sigma approach for patient flow improvement in hospital emergency department. Advanced Materials Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Al Owad, Ali, Karim, Azharul, & Ma, Lin (2014). Integrated lean Six Sigma approach for patient flow improvement in hospital emergency department. Advanced Materials Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Al-Haddad, S., & Kotnour, T. (2015). Integrating the organizational change literature: a model for successful change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 28(2), 234-262. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-11-2013-0215. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Anders, C., & Cassidy, A. (2019). Effective organizational change in health care: Exploring the contribution of empowered users and workers. International Journal of Healthcare Management. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Armenakis, Achilles & Burnes, Bernard. (2015). Organizational Change: A Focus on Ethical Cultures and Mindfulness. Journal of Change Management. 15. 1-7. 10.1080/14697017.2015.1009720. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Assarlind, M., Gremyr, I., & Backman, K. (2019). Multi-faceted views on a Lean Six Sigma application. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Austin, John & Bartunek, Jean. (2003). Theories and Practices of Organizational Development.10.1002/0471264385.wei1213. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bassey, A. O., Solomon, E. H., & Omono, C. E. (2014). An analysis of the application of change management in organisations. Academic Research International, 5, 481- 486. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Bassey, A. O., Solomon, E. H., & Omono, C. E. (2019). An analysis of the application of change management in organisations. Academic Research International. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Bateh, J., Castaneda, M. E., & Farah, J. E. (2013). Employee resistance to organizational change. International Journal of Management & Information Systems (IJMIS), 17, 113-116. Retrieved from www.cluteinstitute.com. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Bennebroek Gravenhorst, Kilian & Werkman, Renate & Boonstra, Jaap. (1999). The change Capacity of Organizations: General Assessment and exploring Nine Configurations. Power Dynamics and Organisational Change III (1999). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Van de Ven, A. H., & Sun, K. (2011). Breakdowns in implementing models of organization change. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(3), 58-74. doi:10.5465/amp.2011.63886530. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Van den Heuvel, M., Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2013). Adapting to change: The value of change information and meaning-making. Journal of Vocational Behavior. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Van den Heuvel, M., Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2013). Adapting to change: The value of change information and meaning-making. Journal of Vocational Behaviors [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Vouzas, Fotis & Psychogios, Alexandros & Tsironis, Loukas. (2014). The Road Towards Lean Six Sigma: Sustainable Success Factors in Service Industry. Nang Yan Business [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Comparative Study of Adjustment Level, Parental Income and Academic Achievement of Adolescent Girls
• Increase in STIs among Adolescents in Masvingo District
• A Correlation between SDG 4 (Quality Education) and Emotional Disposition of Teacher Educators in Hyderabad District
• Ear Piercing Behaviour and Self-Esteem among Male University Students in Nigeria
• A Study of Religiosity and Psychological Well-Being