Beyond Climate Change: Empirical Evidence that Lagdo Dam Operations and not Rainfall Variability Drive Catastrophic Flooding in Nigeria's Niger Delta
Authors
Environmental and Rural Mediation Centre (ENVIRUMEDIC), Warri, Delta State (Nigeria)
Department of Environmental Management and Toxicology, Federal University of Petroleum Resources, Effurun, Delta State (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.11013SP0016
Subject Category: Environment
Volume/Issue: 11/13 | Page No: 210-226
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-03-24
Accepted: 2026-03-31
Published: 2026-05-15
Abstract
The Niger Delta experiences recurrent catastrophic flooding often attributed to climate change in policy discourse. However, local communities consistently identify releases from Cameroon's Lagdo Dam as the principal driver, indicating a transboundary governance issue insufficiently addressed in disaster risk reduction frameworks. This study investigates the relationship between Lagdo Dam operations and flood occurrence in Delta State, Nigeria, over a 30-year period (1995–2024), integrating climate trend analysis with community knowledge. A mixed-methods design combined Mann–Kendall trend analysis, Sen’s slope estimation, and Pettitt change-point detection for precipitation and temperature data with community perceptions obtained from 761 household surveys (94.0% response rate), 36 key informant interviews, and 18 focus group discussions across 18 communities. Geospatial analysis applied Principal Component Analysis to construct a Social Vulnerability Index and used Geographically Weighted Regression to model spatial flood impacts. Results show significant warming (+1.17 °C over 30 years, p < 0.01) but no statistically significant trend in annual precipitation (p > 0.05). Change-point analysis identified 2012 as a major break in flood frequency (p < 0.001), without a corresponding precipitation shift. Notably, 86% of respondents attribute flooding primarily to Lagdo Dam releases. The vulnerability index identified three dimensions explaining 73.4% of variance, while spatial clustering along the Niger River corridor was significant (Moran’s I = 0.342, p < 0.001). Five communities representing 38% of the population accounted for 72% of modeled risk. Findings demonstrate that transboundary dam operations, rather than precipitation change, are the dominant driver of flooding, highlighting the need for strengthened Nigeria–Cameroon water governance agreements alongside locally targeted vulnerability reduction strategies.
Keywords
Transboundary water governance, Lagdo Dam
Downloads
References
1. Adejuwon, J. O. (2012). Rainfall seasonality in the Niger Delta Belt, Nigeria. Journal of Geography and Regional Planning, 5(2), 51-60. https://doi.org/10.5897/JGRP11.123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Adelekan, I. O. (2010). Vulnerability of poor urban coastal communities to flooding in Lagos, Nigeria. Environment and Urbanization, 22(2), 433-450. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247810380141 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Akinkuolie, R. (2025, May 10). Nigeria: Flood water attack from Cameroun. The Guardian Nigeria. https://guardian.ng/opinion/letters/nigeria-flood-water-attack-from-cameroun/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Brouwer, R., Akter, S., Brander, L., & Haque, E. (2007). Socioeconomic vulnerability and adaptation to environmental risk: A case study of climate change and flooding in Bangladesh. Risk Analysis, 27(2), 313-326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00884.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Chambers, R. (2006). Participatory mapping and geographic information systems: Whose map? Who is empowered and who disempowered? Who gains and who loses? The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 25(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2006.tb00163.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Cutter, S. L., Boruff, B. J., & Shirley, W. L. (2003). Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Social Science Quarterly, 84(2), 242-261. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6237.8402002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Di Baldassarre, G., Montanari, A., Lins, H., Koutsoyiannis, D., Brandimarte, L., & Blöschl, G. (2010). Flood fatalities in Africa: From diagnosis to mitigation. Geophysical Research Letters, 37(22), L22402. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL045467 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Fotheringham, A. S., Brunsdon, C., & Charlton, M. (2002). Geographically weighted regression: The analysis of spatially varying relationships. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Gaillard, J. C., & Mercer, J. (2013). From knowledge to action: Bridging gaps in disaster risk reduction. Progress in Human Geography, 37(1), 93-114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132512446717 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Gilbert, R. O. (1987). Statistical methods for environmental pollution monitoring. Van Nostrand Reinhold. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2022). Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Kendall, M. G. (1975). Rank correlation methods (4th ed.). Charles Griffin. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Mann, H. B. (1945). Nonparametric tests against trend. Econometrica, 13(3), 245-259. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907187 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Mercer, J., Kelman, I., Taranis, L., & Suchet-Pearson, S. (2010). Framework for integrating indigenous and scientific knowledge for disaster risk reduction. Disasters, 34(1), 214-239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2009.01126.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Munia, H., Guillaume, J. H. A., Mirumachi, N., Porkka, M., Wada, Y., & Kummu, M. (2016). Water stress in global transboundary river basins: Significance of upstream water use on downstream stress. Environmental Research Letters, 11(1), 014002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/1/014002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. National Emergency Management Agency. (2012). 2012 flood disaster report. NEMA, Abuja. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. National Emergency Management Agency. (2024). 2024 flood disaster situation report. NEMA, Abuja. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Nhemachena, C., Nhamo, L., Matchaya, G., Nhemachena, C. R., Muchara, B., Karuaihe, S. T., & Mpandeli, S. (2020). Climate change impacts on water and agriculture sectors in Southern Africa: Threats and opportunities for sustainable development. Water, 12(10), 2673. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12102673 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Niang, I., Ruppel, O. C., Abdrabo, M. A., Essel, A., Lennard, C., Padgham, J., & Urquhart, P. (2014). Africa. In V. R. Barros, C. B. Field, D. J. Dokken, M. D. Mastrandrea, K. J. Mach, T. E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K. L. Ebi, Y. O. Estrada, R. C. Genova, B. Girma, E. S. Kissel, A. N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P. R. Mastrandrea, & L. L. White (Eds.), Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part B: Regional aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 1199-1265). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Nicholson, S. E. (2013). The West African Sahel: A review of recent studies on the rainfall regime and its interannual variability. International Scholarly Research Notices, 2013, Article 453521. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/453521 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Oguntunde, P. G., Abiodun, B. J., & Lischeid, G. (2012). Spatial and temporal temperature trends in Nigeria, 1901-2000. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 118(1-2), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-012-0199-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Pettitt, A. N. (1979). A non-parametric approach to the change-point problem. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 28(2), 126-135. https://doi.org/10.2307/2346729 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Sen, P. K. (1968). Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall's tau. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 63(324), 1379-1389. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1968.10480934 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. United Nations Environment Programme. (2020). Adaptation gap report 2020. UNEP. https://www.unep.org/resources/adaptation-gap-report-2020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. United Nations Water. (2020). Transboundary waters: Sharing benefits, sharing responsibilities. UN-Water. https://www.unwater.org/publications/transboundary-waters-sharing-benefits-sharing-responsibilities/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., & Davis, I. (2004). At risk: Natural hazards, people's vulnerability and disasters (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Zeitoun, M., & Warner, J. (2006). Hydro-hegemony: A framework for analysis of trans-boundary water conflicts. Water Policy, 8(5), 435-460. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2006.054 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Methane Emissions from Municipal Solid Waste - Case Study in Cai Rang District, Can Tho City, Vietnam
- Youth Activism, Intentional Integration of Policies to Raise Awareness on Climate Change Action among the Youth
- Breathing Spaces: Environmental & User Experience in Dhanmondi and Zigatola Multistoried Apartments, Dhaka, Bangladesh
- Effects of Solid Waste Disposal on Soil Quality in Makurdi Metropolis, Benue State, Nigeria
- Environmental Impact of Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining in Borgu Local Government Area