Beyond Fast Fashion: A Comparative Review of Upcycling and Recycling Strategies in Sustainable Fashion Design

The environmental impact of the global fashion industry has intensified concerns regarding unsustainable production practices and the rapid accumulation of textile waste. As the fast fashion model continues to dominate global clothing markets, researchers and industry stakeholders are increasingly exploring circular strategies capable of reducing environmental harm while maintaining economic viability. Among the most widely discussed approaches are recycling and upcycling, both of which aim to extend the lifecycle of textile materials and reduce dependence on virgin resources. However, existing academic literature often discusses these strategies separately, with relatively few studies offering a systematic comparison between them within the context of sustainable fashion design. This study presents a structured literature review that critically examines recycling and upcycling as complementary strategies within circular fashion systems. Academic articles, books, institutional reports, and conference publications published between 2010 and 2024 were identified through systematic searches of databases including Scopus, Google Scholar, and JSTOR. After applying inclusion criteria related to relevance, academic credibility, and thematic focus, 65 sources were selected and analyzed using thematic content analysis. The findings indicate that recycling is primarily associated with industrial-scale material recovery and technological processing that allows large volumes of textile waste to be converted into new fibers. While this approach can reduce reliance on virgin materials, it may involve technological limitations such as fiber degradation and energy-intensive processing. Upcycling, in contrast, is strongly linked to design innovation and creative reuse, enabling designers to transform existing garments or textile waste into new products without destroying the original material structure. Upcycling can promote emotional durability, cultural value, and consumer engagement in sustainable fashion, although it often faces challenges related to scalability and integration within industrial supply chains. The study argues that recycling and upcycling should not be viewed as competing strategies but rather as complementary components of a broader circular fashion ecosystem. Hybrid models that combine recycling infrastructure with design-led upcycling practices may offer more holistic solutions to the environmental challenges facing the fashion industry. By synthesizing existing research and presenting a comparative framework, this paper contributes to sustainable fashion scholarship and provides insights for designers, policymakers, educators, and industry stakeholders seeking to transition toward regenerative fashion systems.

sustainable fashion, circular economy, textile waste, upcycling

1. Armstrong, C. M., Niinimäki, K., Kujala, S., Karell, E., & Lang, C. (2015). Sustainable clothing product–service systems: Consumer perceptions of consumption alternatives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 97, 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.046 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bick, R., Halsey, E., & Ekenga, C. C. (2018). The global environmental injustice of fast fashion. Environmental Health, 17(1), 92. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-018-0433-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bocken, N. M. P., Bakker, C., & de Pauw, I. (2016). Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33(5), 308–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chapman, J. (2005). Emotionally durable design: Objects, experiences and empathy. Earthscan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Durrani, M. (2020). Fashion from the margins: Upcycling, circular economy and inclusive design in South Asia. Asian Textile Studies Journal, 4(2), 44–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Earley, R., & Goldsworthy, K. (2015). Designing for circular fashion: Textile upcycling as a design methodology. In S. S. Muthu (Ed.), Handbook of sustainable apparel production (pp. 269–284). CRC Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2017). A new textiles economy: Redesigning fashion’s future. https://ellenmacarthurfoundation.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2019). The jeans redesign project. https://ellenmacarthurfoundation.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Farrant, L., Olsen, S. I., & Wangel, A. (2010). Environmental benefits from reusing clothes. Waste Management, 30(2), 232–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.09.017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Fletcher, K. (2014). Sustainable fashion and textiles: Design journeys (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Fletcher, K., & Tham, M. (2019). Earth logic: Fashion action research plan. The JJ Charitable Trust. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Gwilt, A. (2014). A practical guide to sustainable fashion. Fairchild Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Joy, A., Sherry, J. F., Venkatesh, A., Wang, J., & Chan, R. (2012). Fast fashion, sustainability, and the ethical appeal of luxury brands. Fashion Theory, 16(3), 273–295. https://doi.org/10.2752/175174112X13340749707123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. North Point Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. McNeill, L., & Moore, R. (2015). Sustainable fashion consumption and the fast fashion conundrum. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 39(3), 212–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12169 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Muthu, S. S. (2015). Handbook of recycling: State-of-the-art for practitioners, analysts, and scientists. Woodhead Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Niinimäki, K., & Hassi, L. (2011). Emerging design strategies in sustainable production and consumption of textiles and clothing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(16), 1876–1883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.04.020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Niinimäki, K., Peters, G., Dahlbo, H., Perry, P., Rissanen, T., & Gwilt, A. (2020). The environmental price of fast fashion. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 1, 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0039-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Park, H., & Kim, H. (2016). Sustainable clothing practices: An empirical comparison of upcycled and recycled apparel. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 40(5), 562–571. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12275 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Rissanen, T., & McQuillan, H. (2016). Zero waste fashion design. Bloomsbury Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Sandin, G., & Peters, G. M. (2018). Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling. Journal of Cleaner Production, 184, 353–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.266 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Shirvanimoghaddam, K., Motamed, B., Ramakrishna, S., & Naebe, M. (2020). Death by waste: Fashion and textile circular economy case. Science of the Total Environment, 718, 137317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137317 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Stahel, W. R. (2016). The circular economy. Nature, 531(7595), 435–438. https://doi.org/10.1038/531435a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Sung, K. (2015). A critical review of upcycling in relation to the circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Sung, K., Cooper, T., & Kettley, S. (2017). Individual upcycling practice: Exploring motivations and barriers. Sustainability, 9(4), 568. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9040568 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. UNEP. (2020). Sustainability and circularity in the textile value chain. United Nations Environment Programme. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Case Study on the Development and Simulation of a High-Efficiency Flyback Converter for Portable Solar LED Lighting
• Greening the Campus: Stakeholders’ Insights on Sustainability Practices in a Chinese Higher Education Institution
• Malaysia’s Renewable Energy and CO₂ Emissions: ARDL–ECM Evidence with Policy and Managerial Implications
• Waqf within Business Model Framework: A Review and Research Agenda
• Sustainability-Driven Green City Framework and its Impact on Malaysia’s Tourism Industry Development