Beyond Implementation: A Critical Review of the Literature on ERP Systems and the Financial Performance of SMEs
Authors
Accountancy, Sri Lanka Institute of Advanced Technological Education (Sri Lanka)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.110400179
Subject Category: Accounting
Volume/Issue: 11/4 | Page No: 2385-2388
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-04-09
Accepted: 2026-04-15
Published: 2026-05-19
Abstract
This paper provides a critical review of the literature exploring the relationship between Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems and the financial performance of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs). While substantial research exists on ERP in large enterprises, the SME context is distinct and fraught with unique challenges. The review synthesizes findings into three dominant narratives: the "Productivity Paradox," the "Integrated Value Proposition," and the "Contextual Mediation" perspective. A critical analysis reveals significant methodological limitations, including a reliance on perceptual data, short-term financial metrics, and a lack of consensus on the definition of "financial performance." Furthermore, the literature often under-theorizes the complex mediating role of organizational and external factors. The paper concludes by identifying critical research gaps and proposing a framework for future studies to move beyond simplistic cause-and-effect models towards a more nuanced understanding of how, when, and why ERP systems influence the financial health of SMEs.
Keywords
ERP, SME.s, ROA and ROI
Downloads
References
1. Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000). A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: an empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 169-196. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Elbanna, A. (2021). The ongoing journey of ERP research: The cloud era. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 30(2), 101681. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Gattiker, T. F., & Goodhue, D. L. (2005). What happens after ERP implementation: Understanding the impact of interdependence and differentiation on plant-level outcomes. MIS Quarterly, 29(3), 559-585. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Haddara, M., & Zach, O. (2011). ERP systems in SMEs: A literature review. In 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1-10). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Ifinedo, P. (2011). Examining the influences of external expertise and in-house computer/IT knowledge on ERP system success. Journal of Systems and Software, 84(12), 2065-2078. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Ifinedo, P., Rapp, B., Ifinedo, A., & Sundberg, K. (2010). Relationships among ERP post-implementation success constructs: An analysis at the organizational level. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1136-1148. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Mabert, V. A., Soni, A., & Venkataramanan, M. A. (2003). The impact of organization size on enterprise resource planning (ERP) implementations in the US manufacturing sector. Omega, 31(3), 235-246. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Nicolaou, A. I. (2004). Firm performance effects in relation to the implementation and use of enterprise resource planning systems. Journal of Information Systems, 18(2), 79-105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Poston, R., & Grabski, S. (2001). Financial impacts of enterprise resource planning implementations. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 2(4), 271-294. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Raymond, L., & Uwizeyemungu, S. (2007). A profile of ERP adoption in manufacturing SMEs. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 20(4), 487-502. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Shang, S., & Seddon, P. B. (2002). Assessing and managing the benefits of enterprise systems: the business manager's perspective. Information Systems Journal, 12(4), 271-299. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Soh, C., Kien, S. S., & Tay-Yap, J. (2000). Cultural fits and misfits: Is ERP a universal solution? Communications of the ACM, 43(4), 47-51. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Role of Value and Growth Stocks in Portfolio Returns: Insights From the Nigerian Stock Market
- The Impact of Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) and Profitability on Firm Value Moderated by Firm Size
- Assessment of the Impact of Environmental Operating Costs on Return on Assets: Evidence from Listed Breweries in Nigeria
- Mobile Money and Digital Financial Services Ecosystem in Adamawa State
- A Quantitative Approach of Professional Skepticism and Fraud Detection among Malaysian Internal Auditors