Biomechanical and Energetic Consequences of Stride Length–Frequency Modulation across Running Speeds
Authors
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona (USA)
Dhaka University of Engineering & Technology, Gazipur (USA)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.11070051
Subject Category: Engineering & Technology
Volume/Issue: 11/7 | Page No: 850-869
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-20
Accepted: 2026-07-25
Published: 2026-07-31
Abstract
Running speed is governed by coordinated adaptations in stride mechanics and center-of-mass (CoM) dynamics, and this study examined speed-dependent changes in stride parameters, CoM kinematics, and mechanical energy during slow and fast running using two-dimensional kinematic approach and computational modeling. A physically trained adult performed self-selected slow and fast running trials, with hip marker trajectories used as a surrogate for CoM motion. Slow running was characterized by a lower stride frequency (≈ 0.8 Hz), larger vertical CoM displacement (≈ 0.20 m), and greater gravitational potential energy fluctuations (≈ 140 J), accompanied by modest vertical velocity peaks (≈ 0.9 m/s upward and −0.5 m/s downward), indicating lower propulsive and impact demands. In contrast, fast running exhibited a substantially higher stride frequency (≈ 2.67 Hz), reduced vertical CoM oscillation (≈ 0.10 m), and smaller potential energy fluctuations (≈ 70 J), while vertical velocity magnitudes increased markedly (≈ 1.2 to 1.3 m/s upward and −1.1 m/s downward), reflecting elevated mechanical power output and greater impact loading. Total mechanical energy profiles further demonstrated smoother, lower-amplitude fluctuations during slow running and larger, more variable kinetic energy peaks during fast running, consistent with increased reliance on elastic energy storage and return at higher speeds. Collectively, these findings indicate a speed-dependent transition from an economical, low-impact gait strategy at slower speeds to a spring-mass-dominated, high-power locomotor pattern at faster speeds, highlighting the dynamic interplay between stride length, stride frequency, and CoM energy regulation in human running.
Keywords
Stride length–frequency interaction; center of mass kinematics; vertical and horizontal kinetic energy; gait speed modulation; 2D video-based motion analysis.
Downloads
References
1. Abdullah M., Hulleck A.A., Katmah R., Khalaf K., & El-Rich M., (2024). Multibody dynamics-based musculoskeletal modeling for gait analysis: a systematic review, J. Neuro Engg. Reh., 21, 178. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Alexander R.M., Energy-saving mechanisms in walking and running, J. Exp. Biol., 160 (1991): 55–69. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Arellano, C.J., & Vega, D. (2024). Exploring how the arms can help the legs in facilitating gait rehabilitation. Adv. Biol., 8(6), e2300661 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Arellano, C. J. & Kram, R. (2014). The metabolic cost of human running: is swinging the arms worth it?, J. Exp. Biol., 217, 2456-2461. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Baček T., Sun M., Liu H., Chen Z., Manzie C., Burdet E., Kulić D., Oetomo D. & Tan Y. (2024). A biomechanics and energetics dataset of neurotypical adults walking with and without kinematic constraints, Science Date, 11(1), 646. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Blickhan, R. (1989). The spring–mass model for running and hopping. J. Biom., 22(11–12), 1217–1227. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Cavagna, G.A., Willems, P.A., Legramandi, M.A., & Heglund, N. C. (2002). Pendular energy transduction within the step in human walking. J. Exp. Biol., 205(21), 3413–3422. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Cavagna, G.A., Legramandi, M.A., & Peyré-Tartaruga, L.A. (2008). Old men running: mechanical work and elastic bounce. Pro. Roy. Soc. B, 275, 411–418. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Chiari, L., Della Croce, U., Leardini, A., & Cappozzo, A. (2005). Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry: Part 2 – Ins. err. Gait & Pos., 21(2), 197–211. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Derrick, T.R., Dereu, D., & McLean, S.P. (1998). Impacts and kinematic adjustments during running. J. Biom., 31(10), 951–956. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Donelan, J.M., Kram, R., & Kuo, A.D. (2002). Mechanical work for step-to-step transitions is a major determinant of the metabolic cost of human walking. J. Exp. Biol., 205(23), 3717–3727. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Farley, C.T., & González, O. (1996). Leg stiffness and stride frequency in human running. J. Biom., 29(2), 181–186. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Farris, D.J., & Sawicki, G.S. (2012). The mechanics and energetics of human walking and running: a joint level perspective. J. Roy. Soc. Int., 9(66), 110–118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Farris, D.J., Ha, S., & Sawicki, G.S. (2016). Elastic ankle exoskeletons reduce metabolic cost. J. Neuro Engg. Reh., 13, 97. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Fukuchi, R.K., Fukuchi, C.A., & Duarte, M. (2017). A public dataset of running biomechanics and the effects of running speed on lower extremity kinematics and kinetics. PeerJ, 5, e3298. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Hof, A.L., Gazendam, M.G.J., & Sinke, W.E. (2005). The condition for dynamic stability. J. Biom., 38(1), 1–8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Jiang X., Bíró I., Sárosi J., Fang Y. & Gu Y. (2024) Comparison of ground reaction forces as running speed increases between male and female runners, Front. Bio. Biot., 12, 1378284. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Kram, R., & Taylor, C.R. (1990). Energetics of running: a new perspective. Nature, 346(6281), 265–267. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Krebbekx G.G.J. Waterval N.F.J., Brehm M.A., Kerkhoffs G.M.M.J., Bramer J.A.M. & Verspoor F.G.M. (2025). Gait biomechanics and energy cost of walking after rotationplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis compared to above-knee amputation and healthy participants, Cli. Biom., 128, 106626. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Luciano F. , Minetti A. E., & Pavei G. (2024), Metabolic cost and mechanical work of walking in a virtual reality emulator, Eur. J. App. Phy., 124, 783–792. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. McMahon, T.A., & Cheng, G.C. (1990). The mechanics of running: How does stiffness couple with speed? J. Biom., 23(Suppl 1), 65–78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Mercer, J.A., D. Paul; D., Tim R., & Bates, B.T. (2003). Individual Effects of Stride Length and Frequency on Shock Attenuation during Running, Med. & Sci. in Spo. & Ex., 35(2), 307-313. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Mercer J.A., Vance J., Hreljac A., & Hamill J. (2002). Relationship between shock attenuation and stride length during running at different velocities, Eur. J. App. Phy., 87, 403-408. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Mero, A., Komi, P.V. & Gregor, R.J. (1992). Biomechanics of Sprint Running: A Review, Spo. Med., 13 (6), 376-392. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Nilsson, J., & Thorstensson, A. (1989). Ground reaction forces at different speeds of human walking and running. Acta Phy. Sca., 136(2), 217–227. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Novacheck T.F., The biomechanics of running. Gait Pos., 1998;7(1):77–95. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Orr S., Casler J., Rhoades J., & Leon, P. de. (2022). Effects of walking, running, and skipping under simulated reduced gravity using the NASA Active Response Gravity Offload System (ARGOS), Acta Ast., 197, 115-125. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Pavei G., Zamparo P., Fujii N., Otsu T., Numazu N., Minetti A.E., & Monte A. (2019) Comprehensive mechanical power analysis in sprint running acceleration. Sca. J Med. Sci. Spo., 29,1892–1900. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Robertson, D.G.E., Caldwell, G.E., Hamill, J., Kamen, G., & Whittlesey, S. (2013). Research methods in biomechanics (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, ISBN: 0-7360-8340-0. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Riddick,R.C.,& Kuo, A.D. (2022). Mechanical work accounts for most of the energetic cost in human running. Sci. Rep., 12, 645. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Schache, A.G., Blanch, P.D., Dorn, T.W., Brown, N.A.T., Rosemond, D., & Pandy, M.G. (2011). Effect of running speed on lower limb joint kinetics. Med. Sci. Sp. Ex., 43(7), 1260–1271. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Seyfarth, A., Geyer, H., Günther, M., & Blickhan, R. (2002). A movement criterion for running. J. Biom., 35(5), 649–655. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Tan T., Wouwe T.V., Werling K.F., Liu C.K., Delp S.L., Hicks J.L., & Chaudhari A.S. (2026), GaitDynamics: a generative foundation model for analyzing human walking and running. J. Res. Sq., https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-025-01565-8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Usherwood, J.R. (2024), The functions of leg muscles, structures and mechanisms in running, Biol. Let., 20, 0260. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Willems, P.A. Cavagna, G.A., & Heglund, N.C. (1995). External, internal and total work in human locomotion. J. Exp. Biol., 198(2), 379–393. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Winter. D.A. (2009). Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. 4th ed. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Winter, D.A. (1995). Human balance and posture control during standing and walking. Gait & Posture, 3(4), 193–214. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Impact Of UI/UX Design on User Trust and Task Completion in Civic Tech Platforms
- Solar Cell Photovoltaic Model Shell Sp 75
- Development of an Intelligent Traffic Management System to Address Visibility Obstruction at Urban Intersections: A Case Study of Ibadan Metropolis
- Optimum Placement of Facts Devices on an Interconnected Power Systems Using Particle Swarm Optimisation Technique
- Assessing Construction Transformation and Implication on Future Production Flow System