Comparative Performance of Raptor and Iris Herbicides on Weed Suppression and Grain Yield of Cowpea in Two Agro-Ecological Zones of Nigeria

A field experiment was conducted during the 2021 rainy season to evaluate the performance of two post-emergence herbicides, Raptor and Iris, on weed suppression and grain yield of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) in the Sudan and Northern Guinea savannas of Nigeria. The study was carried out at the Teaching and Research Farm, Bayero University, Kano (Sudan savanna) and the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) research station, Zaria (Northern Guinea savanna). Treatments consisted of two cowpea varieties (IT99K-573-1-1 and UAM14-122-17-7), three application rates of Raptor (1.5, 1.0 and 0.5 L ha⁻¹), three application rates of Iris (0.8, 0.6 and 0.4 L ha⁻¹), hoe weeding, and a no-weeding control. The treatments were arranged in a split-plot design with three replications. Data were collected on weed cover, weed density, weed biomass, weed control efficiency, phytotoxicity, phenological traits, and grain yield.
Results showed that weed control methods significantly influenced weed suppression and grain yield at both locations. Hoe weeding and Raptor, particularly at 1.5 and 1.0 L ha⁻¹, consistently recorded lower weed density, higher weed control efficiency, and superior grain yield compared to Iris treatments and the unweeded control. Iris herbicide, especially at higher application rates, caused significant phytotoxic effects on cowpea plants at the Sudan savanna location, leading to delayed flowering and reduced yield. Grain yield was highest under Raptor at 1.5 L ha⁻¹ at Kano and Raptor at 1.0 L ha⁻¹ at Zaria. The performance of the cowpea varieties varied across locations, with IT99K-573-1-1 performing better at Kano and UAM14-122-17-7 showing superior performance at Zaria.
The study concludes that Raptor herbicide is more effective and safer than Iris for post-emergence weed control in cowpea across both agro-ecological zones. Application of Raptor at 0.5 L ha⁻¹ in the Sudan savanna and 1.0 L ha⁻¹ in the Northern Guinea savanna is recommended for effective weed suppression, reduced phytotoxicity, and improved grain yield.

Cowpea, post-emergence herbicides, weed control efficiency, Raptor, Iris, savanna agro-ecologies

1. Adigun, J.A. (2002). Weed Management in the Tropics: Problems and Prospects. Nigerian Journal of Weed Science, 15, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adigun, J.A., Osipitan, O.A., Lagoke, S.T.O., Adeyemi, O.R., and Afolami, S.O. (2014). Growth and Yield Performance of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) as Influenced by Row Spacing and Weed Control Methods. Nigerian Journal of Weed Science, 27, 47–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ajeigbe, H.A., Singh, B.B., and Emechebe, A.M. (2005). Farmers’ Guide to Cowpea Production in West Africa. IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Akinyemiju, O.A., and Echendu, T.N.C. (1987). Critical Period of Weed Competition in Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Tropical Pest Management, 33, 14–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Dadari, S.A. (2003). Evaluation of Herbicides for Weed Control in Cowpea. Journal of Agricultural Science, 141, 203–208. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. FAO (2022). FAOSTAT Statistical Database. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. FAOSTAT (2010). Production Statistics. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Freitas, F.C.L., Silva, A.A., Ferreira, L.R., Miranda, G.V., and Reis, M.R. (2009). Weed interference in cowpea. Planta Daninha, 27, 241–247. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Gianessi, L.P., and Reigner, N.P. (2007). The Value of Herbicides in U.S. Crop Production. Weed Technology, 21, 559–566. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Gupta, V., Kumar, S., and Singh, M. (2016). Effect of Weed Management Practices on Growth and Yield of Cowpea. Legume Research, 39, 575–580. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kormawa, P.M., Chianu, J.N., and Manyong, V.M. (2000). Cowpea Demand and Supply Patterns in West Africa. Tropical Grain Legumes Bulletin, 4, 12–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Lagoke, S.T.O., Choudhary, A.H., and Tanko, Y.M. (1981). Weed Control in Rainfed Crops in the Nigerian Savanna. Weed Research, 21, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Obatolu, C.R. (2003). Growth and Yield of Cowpea as Influenced by Soil Texture. African Crop Science Journal, 11, 197–202. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Osipitan, O.A., and Dille, J.A. (2017). Fitness Costs Associated with Weed Interference in Cowpea. Weed Science, 65, 424–434. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Osipitan, O.A., Adigun, J.A., Lagoke, S.T.O., and Afolami, S.O. (2016). Critical Period of Weed Interference in Cowpea. Crop Protection, 90, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ravelombola, W.S., Shi, A., and Motes, D. (2017). Nitrogen Fixation and Agronomic Performance of Cowpea. Agronomy, 7, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Silva, A.A., Ferreira, L.R., and Freitas, F.C.L. (2009). Selectivity of Post-emergence Herbicides in Legumes. Planta Daninha, 27, 795–804. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Souza, M.F., Silva, A.A., and Rocha, P.R.R. (2016). Herbicide Selectivity in Cowpea. Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas, 15, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Ugbe, L.A., Akele, S.E., and Okoye, B.C. (2016). Weed Management Effects on Cowpea Productivity. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 11, 3890–3897. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study