Computer Science Professionals' Perspectives on Technology's Role in Climate Action

Authors

Baale, A. A

Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso (Nigeria)

Abdulsalami, B. A

Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso (Nigeria)

Adeyeye, A. M

Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso (Nigeria)

Jenyo, A. A

Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso (Nigeria)

Adeyemo I. A

Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.110130004

Subject Category: Environment

Volume/Issue: 11/13 | Page No: 37-52

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-01-14

Accepted: 2026-01-20

Published: 2026-02-02

Abstract

This study examines how computer science professionals in South-West Nigeria perceive the role of technology in climate action. The study employed a quantitative research approach using a structured questionnaire and hybrid sampling techniques of random sampling and snowball sampling. Data were collected from 60 lecturers and industry professionals and analyzed through descriptive statistics, correlation, and regression to test four hypotheses.

The results demonstrate that computer science professionals are highly aware of climate change and optimistic about technology, particularly low-carbon and new technologies. However, systemic obstacles like cost, infrastructure, and policy gaps limit this optimism. Hypothesis testing reveals a psychosocial pathway in which awareness promotes positive attitudes, but perceived barriers weaken these attitudes, decreasing motivation to act and restricting actual participation in sustainable actions. Professionals nevertheless exhibit high levels of intrinsic motivation and widespread consensus regarding the significance of institutional support, such as professional associations and industry-academia cooperation.
The study concludes that computer science professionals are important and eager contributors to climate action, but increasing awareness, reducing implementation barriers, and bolstering institutional support are necessary to fully realize their contribution. With suggestions to include climate technology into curricula and encourage multi-stakeholder partnerships, the findings help leaders, educators, and policymakers leverage technological skills for climate solutions. To improve generalizability, future studies are urged to use bigger, multinational samples.

Keywords

SDG, Climate change, Technology, Computer Professionals.

Downloads

References

1. Anderson J.T., Guo Z., You Y., Gasparini A., Overstreet C.H., Feng Z., et al. (2020). Potential impact of projected future climate extremes on major crop production in the United States. Science Advances, 6(1), eaav3312. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Murray, C.J.L., A.D. Lopez, K. A. GBD 2010 collaborators. (2020). Global burden of diseases injuries and risk factors study 2010 (GBD 2010): results from a comprehensive assessment of over 200 conditions. Lancet, 376(9741), 2141–2151. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Fagodiya, O. S., Owolabi, O. E., & Olanrewaju, G. O. (2023). A review of greenhouse gas emissions and the role of renewable energy for sustainable development in Africa. Sustainability, 15(3), 1422. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S. B. Gulev, L. Mundywiler, T. Andrews, M. Drögemeyer, et al. (Eds.)]. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Leal F. W., Azul, A. M., Neiva, F., & Azeiteiro, U. M. (Eds.). (2021). Climate Change Risks and Adaptation Strategies for Different Landscapes. Springer, Cham. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Mathison, C., Burke, E. J., Munday, G., Jones, C. D., Smith, C. J., Steinert, N. J., Wiltshire, A. J., Huntingford, C., Kovacs, E., Gohar, L. K., Varney, R. M., & McNeall, D. (2025). A rapid-application emissions-to-impacts tool for scenario assessment: Probabilistic Regional Impacts from Model patterns and Emissions (PRIME). Geoscientific Model Development, 18(17), 1785–1808. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1785-2025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Michel, D., Ablain, M. K., & Havet, I. (2021). Indicators to Monitor Climate Change. In Leal Filho, W., Azul, A. M., Neiva, F., & Azeiteiro, U. M. (Eds.), Climate Change Risks and Adaptation Strategies for Different Landscapes (pp. 203-225). Springer, Cham. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). (2020). Ocean Acidification. https://www.noaa.gov/ocean-acidification [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI). (2020, August 4). What is the difference between weather and climate? [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Neil C. et al. (2023). The Cambridge dictionary [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Olabi, A. G., Wilberforce, T., Ramadan, M., & Al-Sagheer, A. H. (2022). Renewable energy and climate change: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 156, 114193. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Rooney-Varga J. N., Florian K., John D. Sterman, A. P. Jones, M. P., & Kenneth R. (2020). "The climate action simulation." Simulation & Gaming 51(2),114-140. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Santra, P. (2019). Climate change and its impacts on ecosystems and agriculture of India. Climate Change and Environmental Security in South Asia, 11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Srivastav, C. S., Gupta, S. K., & Kumar, S. (2020). Climate-smart agriculture for sustainable agri- food systems in South Asia. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 41(3), 423-447. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Strassburg, B. B., Beyer, H. L., Mooney, A., Pellegrini, T., Balmford, A., Creedon, E. M., ... & Young, L. (2020). Global conservation land targets are feasible but require bolder measures. Science, 370(6515), eabc5988. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Stoll, C., Klawitter, A., & Wachsmuth, G. (2019). The carbon footprint of Bitcoin. Joule, 3(7), 1647-1662. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Suman, A. (2021). "Role of renewable energy technologies in climate change adaptation and mitigation: A brief review from Nepal." Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 151 111524. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. UNESCO. (2023, November). UNESCO in action for gender equality: solutions and statistics. https://unesco.se/wpcontent/uploads/2023/11/UNESCO-in-Action-for-Gender-Equality.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. UNESCO. (2024, October). “Changing the Equation”: A report on gender disparities in STEM occupations in G20 countries. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. https://articles.unesco.org/sites/default/files/medias/fichiers/2024/10/PR_G20_UNESCO_calls_for_great er_gender_equality_in_science_en.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. UN Inter-agency Task on Financing for Development. (2019). Technology roadmap for financing the [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Sustainable Development Goals. United Nations. [UN Inter-agency Task on Financing for Development, 2019] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2023). Climate Action https://www.undp.org/eurasia/ourfocus/environment [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. World Meteorological Organization (WMO). (2025). State of the Climate in 2025 https://library.wmo.int/doc_num.php?explnum_id=11178 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Xiang, K., Ding, J., Yang, H., & Wang, Z. (2021). A review of performance evaluation methods for urban water management systems. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(32), 45503-45523. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Vlasceanu, M., Santos, L. R., Bain, P. G., Becker, J., Bernhard, R., Bigman, Y. E., ... & Muthukrishna, M. (2024). Addressing climate change with behavioral science: Global evidence on the effectiveness of 11 interventions. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Nature Human Behaviour, 8(5), 1012–1026. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01973-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Zhao, X., Chen, Q., & Li, M. (2025). Artificial intelligence in energy and climate modelling: Advances, challenges, and future directions. Applied Energy, 358, 122415. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.122415 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles