Continuous-Flow Synthesis of 4-(2-Nitrophenyl) Morpholine Coiled Tube Microreactor

Authors

Kundan A. Borse

Department of Chemistry, KES’s Pratap College Amalner (M.S.), (India)

Nilesh B. Patil

Department of Chemistry, JET’s Z. B. Patil College, Deopur, Dhule (M.S.), (India)

Shekhar S. Sawant

Institute of Chemical Technology, Matunga, Mumbai (M.S.), (India)

Arunkumar D. Pati

Department of Chemistry, KES’s Pratap College Amalner (M.S.), (India)

Madhukar D. Tayade

Department of Chemistry, KES’s Pratap College Amalner (M.S.), (India)

Ashutosh D. Shinde

Department of Chemistry, KES’s Pratap College Amalner (M.S.), (India)

Nilesh S. Pawar

Department of Chemistry, KES’s Pratap College Amalner (M.S.), (India)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.11060245

Subject Category: Chemistry

Volume/Issue: 11/6 | Page No: 3203-3211

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-06-29

Accepted: 2026-07-04

Published: 2026-07-15

Abstract

The continuous-flow synthesis of 4-(2-nitrophenyl) morpholine was investigated using a coiled tube microreactor to evaluate the influence of reaction temperature and residence time on product yield and purity. Solutions of 2-fluoronitrobenzene and morpholine in the presence of potassium carbonate were continuously pumped through a 100 mL flow reactor equipped with a back-pressure regulator. Reaction temperatures between 140 and 170 °C and residence times from 20 to 50 min were systematically examined. Increasing the reaction temperature from 140 to 160 °C significantly improved the isolated yield from 69.9% to 94.6%, while a further increase to 170 °C resulted in a slight decline in yield to 93.2%. Similarly, increasing the residence time from 20 to 50 min enhanced the product yield from 72.2% to 95.5%, with only marginal improvement beyond 40 min. The optimized reaction conditions were established at 160 °C with a residence time of 40–50 min, affording the desired product in up to 95.5% isolated yield and 99% purity. Structural confirmation was achieved using 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and mass spectrometry. The study demonstrates that continuous-flow processing provides excellent temperature control, enhanced mass transfer, high product quality, and an efficient, scalable alternative to conventional batch synthesis for aromatic nucleophilic substitution reactions.

Keywords

Continuous-flow chemistry; Microreactor technology; Nucleophilic aromatic substitution (SNAr); Process optimization; 4-(2-Nitrophenyl) morpholine

Downloads

References

1. 1 (a) Darvas, F.; Hessel, V.; Dorman, G. Flow Chemistry; De Gruyter: Berlin, 2014. (b) Jensen, K. F.; Reizman, B. J.; Newman, S. G. Lab Chip 2014, 14, 3206. (c) Reschetilowski, W. Microreactors in Preparative Chemistry; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2013. (d) Wirth, T. Microreactors in Organic Synthesis and Catalysis, 2nd ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2013. (e) Wiles, C.; Watts, P. Green Chem. 2012, 14, 38. (f) Wegner, J.; Ceylan, S.; Kirschning, A. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 4583. (g) Hartman, R. L.; McMullen, J. P.; Jensen, K. F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 7502. (h) Wiles, C.; Watts, P. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 6512. (i) Hessel, V. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2009, 32, 1655. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. 2 For a comprehensive review on the synthesis of natural products in flow, see: Pastre, J. C.; Browne, D. L.; Ley, S. V. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 8849. For a recent example, see: Newton, S.; Carter, C. F.; Pearson, C. M.; de C Alves, L.; Lange, H.; Thansandote, P.; Ley, S. V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 4915. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. 3 For a discussion on continuous manufacturing in pharmaceutical industry, see (a) Malet-Sanz, L.; Susanne, F. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 4062. (b) Poechlauer, P.; Colberg, J.; Fisher, E.; Jansen, M.; Johnson, M. D.; Koenig, S. G.; Lawler, M.; Laporte, T.; Manley, J.; Martin, B.; O'Kearney-McMullan, A. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2013, 17, 1472. (c) Jimenez-Gonzalez, C.; Poechlauer, P.; Broxterman, Q. B.; Yang, B.- S.; am Ende, D.; Baird, J.; Bertsch, C.; Hannah, R. E.; Dell’Orco, P.; Noorman, H.; Yee, S.; Reintjens, R.; Wells, A.; Massonneau, V.; Manley, J. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2011, 15, 900. (d) Baxendale, I. R.; Braatz, R. D.; Hodnett, B. K.; Jensen, K. F.; Johnson, M. D.; Sharratt, P.; Sherlock, J.-P.; Florence, A. J. J. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 104, 781. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. 4 (a) Rodrigues, T.; Schneider, P.; Schneider, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 5750. (b) Elvira, K. S.; Solvas, X. C.; Wootton, R. C. R.; deMello, A. J. Nat. Chem. 2013, 5, 905. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. 5 (a) Plouffe, P.; Macchi, A. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2014, 18, 1286. (b) Newman, S. G.; Jensen, K. F. Green Chem. 2013, 15, 1456. Wegner, J.; Ceylan, S.; Kirschning, A. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 4583. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. 6 Baumann, M.; Garcia, A. M. R.; Baxendale, I. R. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015, 13, 4231–4239. doi:10.1039/C5OB00245A. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. 7 Webb, D.; Jamison, T. F. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 2465–2467. doi:10.1021/ol300722e [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. 8 Shu, W.; Pellegatti, L.; Oberli, M. A.; Buchwald, S. L. Angew. Chem. 2011, 123, 10853–10857. doi:10.1002/ange.201105223 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. 9 Noël, T.; Kuhn, S.; Musacchio, A. J.; Jensen, K. F.; Buchwald, S. L. Angew. Chem. 2011, 123, 6065–6068. doi:10.1002/ange.201101480 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. 10 Poh, J.-S.; Browne, D. L.; Ley, S. V. React. Chem. Eng. 2016, 1, 101–105. doi:10.1039/C5RE00082C [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. 11 Nagaki, A.; Kim, H.; Yoshida, J.-i. Angew. Chem. 2009, 121, 8207–8209. doi:10.1002/ange.200904316 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. 12 Tsubogo, T.; Oyamada, H.; Kobayashi, S. Nature 2015, 520, 329–332. doi:10.1038/nature14343 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. 13 Cole, K. P.; Groh, J. M.; Johnson, M. D.; Burcham, C. L.; Campbell, B. M.; Diseroad, W. D.; Heller, M. R.; Howell, J. R.; Kallman, N. J.; Koenig, T. M.; May, S. A.; Miller, R. D.; Mitchell, D.; Myers, D. P.; Myers, S. S.; Phillips, J. L.; Polster, C. S.; White, T. D.; Cashman, J.; Hurley, D.; Moylan, R.; Sheehan, P.; Spencer, R. D.; Desmond, K.; Desmond, P.; Gowran, O. Science 2017, 356, 1144–1150. doi:10.1126/science.aan0745 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. 14 Adamo, A.; Beingessner, R. L.; Behnam, M.; Chen, J.; Jamison, T. F.; Jensen, K. F.; Monbaliu, J.-C. M.; Myerson, A. S.; Revalor, E. M.; Snead, D. R.; Stelzer, T.; Weeranoppanant, N.; Wong, S. Y.; Zhang, P. Science 2016, 352, 61–67. doi:10.1126/science.aaf1337 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. 15 Kupracz, L.; Kirschning, A. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2013, 355, 3375–3380. doi:10.1002/adsc.201300614 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. 16 Hartwig, J.; Ceylan, S.; Kupracz, L.; Coutable, L.; Kirschning, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 9813–9817. doi:10.1002/anie.201302239 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. 17 Murray, P. R. D.; Browne, D. L.; Pastre, J. C.; Butters, C.; Guthrie, D.; Ley, S. V. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2013, 17, 1192–1208. doi:10.1021/op4001548 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. 18 Hartman, R. L.; Naber, J. R.; Buchwald, S. L.; Jensen, K. F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 899–903. doi:10.1002/anie.200904634 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. 19 Deadman, B. J.; Collins, S. G.; Maguire, A. R. Chem. – Eur. J. 2015, 21, 2298–2308. doi:10.1002/chem.201404348 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. 20 Movsisyan, M.; Delbeke, E. I. P.; Berton, J. K. E. T.; Battilocchio, C.; Ley, S. V.; Stevens, C. V. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 4892–4928. doi:10.1039/C5CS00902B [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. 21 Mascia, S.; Heider, P. L.; Zhang, H.; Lakerveld, R.; Benyahia, B.; Barton, P. I.; Braatz, R. D.; Cooney, C. L.; Evans, J. M. B.; Jamison, T. F.; Jensen, K. F.; Myerson, A. S.; Trout, B. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 12359–12363. doi:10.1002/anie.201305429 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. 22 McQuade, D. T.; Seeberger, P. H. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 6384–6389. doi:10.1021/jo400583m [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. 23 Pastre, J. C.; Browne, D. L.; Ley, S. V. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 8849–8869. doi:10.1039/c3cs60246j [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. 24 Webb, D.; Jamison, T. F. Chem. Sci. 2010, 1, 675–680. doi:10.1039/c0sc00381f [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. 25 Wegner, J.; Ceylan, S.; Kirschning, A. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2012, 354, 17–57. doi:10.1002/adsc.201100584 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles