Cosmological Tensions and the Interacting Dark Sector: Observational Motivation and Theoretical Constraints

Authors

Prithvi Sharma

Delhi (India)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.110100122

Subject Category: Science

Volume/Issue: 11/1 | Page No: 1468-1472

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-01-28

Accepted: 2026-02-02

Published: 2026-02-19

Abstract

The ΛCDM model has been remarkably successful in describing the large-scale evolution of the Universe, yet persistent discrepancies in key cosmological parameters increasingly challenge its completeness. In particular, the growing tension between early- and late-Universe measurements of the Hubble constant (H₀), along with inconsistencies in the amplitude of matter clustering quantified by S₈, suggests that the standard assumption of non-interacting dark components may require revision. This review examines the Interacting Dark Sector (IDS) hypothesis, in which dark matter and dark energy are allowed to exchange energy and momentum while preserving total energy–momentum conservation. We survey phenomenological coupling models, including density-dependent interactions and running vacuum scenarios, and discuss their impact on the expansion history, structure formation, and cosmological observables. By synthesizing recent theoretical developments with constraints from cosmic microwave background measurements, large-scale structure surveys, and distance-ladder observations, we assess the extent to which IDS models can simultaneously alleviate the H₀ and S₈ tensions. We further examine theoretical challenges associated with stability, thermodynamic consistency, and the lack of a microphysical origin for the coupling. We conclude by outlining observational prospects for testing dark sector interactions with forthcoming surveys and discuss whether the interacting paradigm represents a viable extension of ΛCDM in the era of precision cosmology.

Keywords

Interacting dark sector; dark energy–dark matter interaction; ΛCDM model; Hubble tension

Downloads

References

1. Planck Collaboration. (2020). Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 641, A6. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Riess, A. G., Casertano, S., Yuan, W., Bowers, J. B., Macri, L. M., Zinn, J. C., … Scolnic, D. (2021). A comprehensive measurement of the local value of the Hubble constant with 1 km s⁻¹ Mpc⁻¹ uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES team. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 908(1), L6. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/abdbaf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Di Valentino, E., Mena, O., Pan, S., Visinelli, L., Yang, W., Melchiorri, A., … Silk, J. (2021). In the realm of the Hubble tension: A review of solutions. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 38(15), 153001. In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions - IOPscience [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Wang, B., Abdalla, E., Atrio-Barandela, F., & Pavón, D. (2016). Dark matter and dark energy interactions: Theoretical challenges, cosmological implications, and observational signatures. Reports on Progress in Physics, 79(9), 096901. Dark matter and dark energy interactions: theoretical challenges, cosmological implications and observational signatures - IOPscience [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Amendola, L. (2000). Coupled quintessence. Physical Review D, 62(4), 043511. Coupled quintessence | Phys. Rev. D [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Abdalla, E., Di Valentino, E., Mena, O., Pan, S., Visinelli, L., Yang, W., … Silk, J. (2022). Cosmology intertwined: A review of the Hubble constant and S₈ tensions. Journal of High Energy Astrophysics, 34, 49– 211. Cosmology intertwined: A review of the particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology associated with the cosmological tensions and anomalies - ScienceDirect [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Salvatelli, V., Said, N., Bruni, M., Melchiorri, A., & Wands, D. (2014). Indications of a late-time interaction in the dark sector. Physical Review Letters, 113(18), 181301. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.181301 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Asghari, M., Hazra, D. K., Pourtsidou, A., Banerjee, A., & Moscardini, L. (2019). The H₀ and S₈ tensions in the context of interacting dark energy. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2019(04), 042. On structure formation from a small-scales-interacting dark sector - IOPscience [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Mörtsell, E., & Dhawan, S. (2018). Does the Hubble constant tension call for new physics? Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2018(09), 025. Does the Hubble constant tension call for new physics? - IOPscience [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Li, Y.-H., & Zhang, X. (2014). Running the vacuum model and the H₀ tension. Physical Review D, 90(6), 063009. Late-time vacuum phase transitions: Connecting sub-eV scale physics with cosmological structure formation [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. He, J.-H., Wang, B., & Abdalla, E. (2009). Stability of the perturbations in interacting dark energy models. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Physics Letters B, 671(2), 139–145. On phantom thermodynamics with negative temperature - ScienceDirect [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Bielefeld, J., Caldwell, R. R., & Linder, E. V. (2015). Dark energy and dark matter: Unified dark fluids or coupled systems? Physical Review D, 91(12), 123514. Gamma-ray observations of blazars and the intergalactic magnetic field spectrum | Phys. Rev. D [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Nesseris, S., & Perivolaropoulos, L. (2007). Testing ΛCDM with the growth of structure. Physical Review D, 77(2), 023504. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.77.023504 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Efstathiou, G. (2020). A lock on the Hubble constant. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. 505(3), 3866–3872. Spectral analysis of the quiescent low-mass X-ray binary in the globular cluster M30 | Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | Oxford Academic [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Perlmutter, S., Aldering, G., Goldhaber, G., Knop, R. A., Nugent, P., Castro, P. G., … Supernova Cosmology Project. (1999). Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 high-redshift supernovae. The Astrophysical Journal, 517(2), 565–586. https://doi.org/10.1086/307221 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Shah, P., Lemos, P., Lahav, O., & Hobson, M. P. (2021). The S₈ tension: A review of recent results. The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, 29, 9. A buyer’s guide to the Hubble constant | The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review | Springer Nature Link [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles