Deep Learning-Based Network Traffic Prediction for IoT Routing Optimization in Communication Systems

Authors

Ogili Solomon Nnaedozie

Department of Electrical Electronics, Engineering, Enugu State University of Science and Technology, Agbani Enugu State (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.11030092

Subject Category: Communication

Volume/Issue: 11/3 | Page No: 1166-1176

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-03-20

Accepted: 2026-03-26

Published: 2026-04-15

Abstract

The fast development of the Internet of Things (IoT) has resulted in more and more complex and dynamic network traffic, which poses a serious challenge to the effective routing of the network in a resource-limited environment. This paper suggests a Variational Autoencoder (VAE)-gated recurrent unit (GRU)-based network traffic forecasting and routing enhancement framework to the IoT communication systems. The framework uses VAE to learn latent representations of network traffic, which includes latent patterns and variability, and a GRU to learn time-based dependencies so as to make accurate multi-step predictions of traffic. Traffic information is also predicted and included in a traffic-aware routing engine whereby optimal routes are chosen dynamically in response to congestion, remaining node energy, and Quality-Of-Service (QoS) needs. The Python network simulator is used in the implementation and evaluation of the system and its performance is compared with the performance of the conventional routing protocols like RPL and AODV. The simulation findings prove that the proposed VAE-GRU framework can drastically enhance the performance of the network with a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 0.052 and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 0.074 in traffic prediction. At the network level, the predictive routing mechanism reduces end-to-end delay (61-132ms), increases packet delivery ratio (91.8-99%), enhances throughput (346-468kbps), and lowers average energy consumption per node (1.41-2.54J) across varying traffic loads. These findings substantiate the fact that predictive intelligence in traffic and adaptive routing help to provide a scalable, energy-efficient, and resilient solution to IoT networks. This framework is especially efficient in the high-traffic and dense network environment, which outlines its usability in the next-generation IoT communication systems that demand a high-quality and reliable, proactive and resource-conscious routing.

Keywords

IoT Network; Traffic Prediction; Hybrid VAE-GRU; Routing Optimization; Deep Learning

Downloads

References

1. Al-Fuqaha, A., Guizani, M., Mohammadi, M., Aledhari, M., & Ayyash, M. (2015). Internet of Things: A survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 17(4), 2347–2376. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2015.2444095 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Chae, S., Kwon, S., & Lee, D. (2018). Predicting infectious disease using deep learning and big data. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(8), 1596. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15081596 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. CHIDI, E. U., UDANOR, C. N., & ANOLIEFO, E. (2024). Exploring the Depths of Visual Understanding: A Comprehensive Review on Real-Time Object of Interest Detection Techniques. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202402.0583.v1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ebere Uzoka Chidi, E Anoliefo, C Udanor, AT Chijindu, LO Nwobodo (2025)” A Blind navigation guide model for obstacle avoidance using distance vision estimation based YOLO-V8n; Journal of the Nigerian Society of Physical Sciences, 2292-229; https://doi.org/10.46481/jnsps.2025.2292 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ghazal, T. M., Hasan, M. K., Alshurideh, M. T., Alzoubi, H. M., Ahmad, M., Akbar, S. S., Al Kurdi, B., &Akour, I. A. (2021). IoT for smart cities: Machine learning approaches in smart healthcare—A review. Future Internet, 13(8), 218. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13080218 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., &Palaniswami, M. (2013). Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Generation Computer Systems, 29(7), 1645–1660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2013.01.010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Jeon, S. B., & Jeong, M.-H. (2024). Integrating spatio-temporal graph convolutional networks with CNNs for predicting short-term traffic speed in urban road networks. Applied Sciences, 14(14), 6102. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14146102 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kingma, D. P., & Welling, M. (2014). Auto-encoding variational Bayes. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR). arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.6114 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kraemer, M. U. G., et al. (2019). Utilizing machine learning for epidemic forecasting. Nature Communications, 10(1), 123. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09186-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Liu, M., & Yang, L. (2024). IoT network traffic analysis with deep learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.04469. https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.04469 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Priyeash, B., & Thyagarajan, J. (2021). Performance evaluation and comparison analysis of AODV and RPL using NetSim in low power, lossy networks. In Futuristic Communication and Network Technologies (pp. 11–22). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Sember, V., Jurak, G., Kovač, M., Morrison, S. A., & Starc, G. (2020). Children’s physical activity, academic performance, and cognitive functioning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Public Health, 8, 307. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00307 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Senthilkumar, P., & Subramani, B. (2021). RPL protocol limitations and open challenges in Internet of Things: A review. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, 10(5), 1–6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Shah, Z., Levula, A., Khurshid, K., Ahmed, J., Ullah, I., & Singh, S. (2021). Routing protocols for mobile Internet of Things (IoT): A survey on challenges and solutions. Electronics, 10(19), 2320. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10192320 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Singh, V., Sahana, S. K., & Bhattacharjee, V. (2025). A novel CNN-GRU-LSTM based deep learning model for accurate traffic prediction. Discover Computing, 28, Article 38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-025-00238-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Sobral, J. V. V., Rodrigues, J. J. P. C., Rabêlo, R. A. L., Al-Muhtadi, J., &Korotaev, V. (2019). Routing protocols for low power and lossy networks in Internet of Things applications. Sensors, 19(9), 2144. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19092144 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Ulagwu-Echefu A., Eneh .I.I. Ebere U.C. (2021). Enhancing realtime supervision and control of industrial processes over wireless network architecture using model predictive controller. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science (IJRIAS); vol 6; Issue 9. https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrias/DigitalLibrary/volume-6-issue-9/56-61.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, Ł., &Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 5998–6008. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Yeboah-Manu, D., et al. (2018). Challenges in the management of Buruli ulcer in endemic regions. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 12(5), e0006461. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006461 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles