Determinants of Mobile Service Provider Selection in Rural-Urban India: A Demographic Analysis
Authors
Research Scholar, Department of Commerce and management studies, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam (India)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.11060305
Subject Category: Arts and management
Volume/Issue: 11/6 | Page No: 4075-4083
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-02
Accepted: 2026-07-07
Published: 2026-07-20
Abstract
This study investigates the factors influencing mobile service provider selection among 550 respondents in East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh, India. Employing a comprehensive survey methodology, we examine ten service attributes and their variation across demographic segments including age, income, occupation, education, gender, and provider affiliation. The findings reveal that internet speed (90.9%), 4G/5G availability (85.7%), and recharge options (83.2%) are the most influential factors, while traditional considerations like affordable tariff plans (51.7%) and network coverage (57.2%) rank lower. Notably, income significantly differentiates priorities for internet speed (F=85.404, p=0.000), while occupation influences perceptions of call quality and promotional offers. Factor analysis extracted four dimensions: Core Service Fundamentals, Value-Added Data Appeal, Brand Perception, and Trust-Communication Reliability. Regression analysis identifies affordable tariff plans as the sole significant predictor of provider selection (β=0.259, p=0.035). The study provides actionable insights for telecom operators in emerging markets characterized by high multi-SIM usage (83.3%) and data-centric consumption patterns.
Keywords
Mobile Service Provider Selection, Telecommunications, Consumer Behavior, Demographic Segmentation, Factor Analysis, India
Downloads
References
1. Aaker, D. A. (1996). Building Strong Brands. Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Anderson, E. W., & Sullivan, M. W. (1993). The antecedents and consequences of customer satisfaction for firms. Marketing Science, 12(2), 125-143. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Bolton, R. N. (1998). A dynamic model of the duration of the customer's relationship with a continuous service provider. Marketing Science, 17(1), 45-65. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Deng, Z., Lu, Y., Wei, K. K., & Zhang, J. (2010). Understanding customer satisfaction and loyalty: An empirical study of mobile instant messages in China. International Journal of Information Management, 30(4), 289-300. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Ganesh, J., Arnold, M. J., & Reynolds, K. E. (2000). Understanding the customer base of service providers: An examination of the differences between switchers and stayers. Journal of Marketing, 64(3), 65-87. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Gerpott, T. J., Rams, W., & Schindler, A. (2001). Customer retention, loyalty, and satisfaction in the German mobile cellular telecommunications market. Telecommunications Policy, 25(4), 249-269. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Ida, T., &Sakahira, K. (2015). Income and price elasticities of mobile data demand in Japan. Telecommunications Policy, 39(3-4), 283-290. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. American Economic Review, 93(5), 1449-1475. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Khatibi, A., Ismail, H., & Thyagarajan, V. (2018). Customer perceptions on mobile communication services: An empirical study. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, 12(3), 1-12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Kim, M. K., Park, M. C., & Jeong, D. H. (2004). The effects of customer satisfaction and switching barrier on customer loyalty in Korean mobile telecommunication services. Telecommunications Policy, 28(2), 145-159. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Kumar, S., & Babu, K. (2019). Rural-urban divide in mobile service quality perception: A comparative study. Indian Journal of Marketing, 49(5), 7-21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Kurnia, S., & Pal, A. (2020). Age-based differences in mobile service adoption in developing countries. International Journal of Information Technology, 12(3), 231-245. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Lai, F., Griffin, M., & Babin, B. J. (2009). How quality, value, image, and satisfaction create loyalty at a Chinese telecom. Journal of Business Research, 62(10), 980-986. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Lancaster, K. J. (1966). A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy, 74(2), 132-157. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Lee, J., & Lee, H. (2014). Word-of-mouth communication in social media: The role of tie strength and information quality. Journal of Business Research, 67(11), 2381-2388. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Manjunath, M. S., Pradeep, M. D., & Nagaraju, B. (2017). Multi-SIM usage and its impact on telecom market in India. Journal of Indian Business Research, 9(3), 234-251. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Rust, R. T., Inman, J. J., Jia, J., & Zahorik, A. (1999). What you don't know about customer-perceived quality. Marketing Science, 18(1), 77-92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Sharma, S. (2017). The impact of promotional offers on mobile service provider selection in India. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 25(5-6), 456-470. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Tax, S. S., & Brown, S. W. (1998). Recovering and learning from service failure. MIT Sloan Management Review, 40(1), 75-88. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. TRAI. (2024). Annual Report on Telecom Services in India. Telecom Regulatory Authority of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2006). Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings. Poetics, 34(4-5), 221-235 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]