Distributed Leadership Theory and Power Dynamics in University Governance: A Postcolonial Perspective

Authors

Otieno Kenneth Okello

Political and Administrative Studies, Kampala International University (Uganda)

Dr. Sr bernadette Lutaaya

Political and Administrative Studies, Kampala International University (Uganda)

Zuwena Hassan

Political and Administrative Studies, Kampala International University (Uganda)

Nabimanya Norman

Political and Administrative Studies, Kampala International University (Uganda)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.11060133

Subject Category: Leadership

Volume/Issue: 11/6 | Page No: 1769-1775

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-06-10

Accepted: 2026-06-15

Published: 2026-07-01

Abstract

This research explored the interconnection between distributed leadership and power in the governance of public universities in Uganda from a postcolonial view. Distributed leadership is touted as a collective governance model; however, its implementation in African higher education is limited by institutional and historic inequalities (Ndlovu-Gatsheni, 2020; Nabaho & Turyasingura, 2024). This study used a qualitative multiple case study approach with three public universities in Uganda. Semi-structured interviews and document analysis were used to collect data, which were analysed thematically. It was found that while distributed leadership is institutionalised, its implementation is constrained by centralised power, informal networks and politics (Tian et al., 2016; Nabaho & Turyasingura, 2024). Governance is not equitable and decisions are made by senior administrators. The study findings reveal that distributed leadership takes place within power structures inherited from colonialism. It calls for institutional and cultural changes to enable inclusive governance.

Keywords

Distributed leadership; University governance; Power dynamics; Postcolonial theory; Higher education; Uganda; Institutional leadership; Participatory governance; Decolonization; Organizational culture; Leadership practices; Governance reform

Downloads

References

1. Bisaso, R. (2017). Makerere University as a flagship institution: Sustaining the quest for relevance. In D. Teferra (Ed.), Flagship universities in Africa (pp. 425–466). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49403-6_11 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bolden, R., Petrov, G., & Gosling, J. (2009). Distributed leadership in higher education: Rhetoric and reality. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 37(2), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143208100301 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Cloete, N., Maassen, P., & Bailey, T. (2015). Knowledge production and contradictory functions in African higher education. African Minds. https://doi.org/10.47622/978-1-920677-85-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2021). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Harris, A. (2020). Distributed leadership matters: Perspectives, practicalities, and potential. Corwin Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Heleta, S. (2018). Decolonising knowledge in South Africa: Dismantling the ‘pedagogy of big lies’. Ufahamu: A Journal of African Studies, 40(2). https://doi.org/10.5070/F7402040942 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Jones, S., Lefoe, G., Harvey, M., & Ryland, K. (2012). Distributed leadership: A collaborative framework for academics, executives, and professionals in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 34(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2012.642334 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Nabaho, L., & Turyasingura, W. (2024). Higher education governance and management in Africa: Continental, regional, and national perspectives. (Publisher details if available). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. J. (2020). The dynamics of epistemological decolonisation in the 21st century: Towards epistemic freedom. The Strategic Review for Southern Africa, 40(1). https://doi.org/10.35293/srsa.v40i1.268 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Spillane, J. P. (2005). Distributed leadership. The Educational Forum, 69(2), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720508984678 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Tian, M., Risku, M., & Collin, K. (2016). A meta-analysis of distributed leadership from 2002 to 2013. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(1), 146–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214558576 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles