E-Government Adoption in West Africa: A Narrative Review of Trends, Challenges, and Policy Innovations

E-government initiatives in West Africa have expanded over the past decade, yet adoption and implementation remain uneven across the sub-region. This structured narrative review synthesises peer-reviewed scholarship published between January 2015 and December 2025, identified through targeted searches in Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, conference proceedings and authoritative grey literature, including United Nations E-Government Survey reports, World Bank datasets, and national digital strategy documents, to provide policy context. The review is organised around recurring analytical categories in the literature, including digital inclusion and infrastructure, citizen engagement, transparency and anti-corruption, cybersecurity and data protection, service delivery outcomes, and institutional capacity. Across these domains, the literature points to three consistent findings. First, access constraints and high connectivity costs continue to shape who benefits from digital public services. Second, weak institutional capacity and limited interoperability often produce fragmented implementation even where national strategies exist. Third, trust-related factors remain decisive for sustained uptake, particularly cybersecurity governance and data protection enforcement. Comparative indicators further reveal divergent trajectories within the sub-region, with Ghana performing ahead of many peers on the United Nations E-Government Development Index (EGDI), while Nigeria remains in the middle tier despite major reforms. This review consolidates dispersed regional evidence within a single analytical frame, clarifies the determinants most consistently associated with e-government adoption in West Africa, and identifies priorities for both implementation and future research.

E-government adoption, Digital governance, West Africa, Digital divide

1. C. N. Nwokoroeze, T. R. Onwuekwem, and U. H. Chukwu, “Evaluating the Impact of E-Government and Digital Transformation on Public Service Delivery in Nigeria,” GJPSA, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 31–41, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.37745/gjpsa.2013/vol13n23141. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. N. Mncwango and T. Mncwango, “ICTS and e-Governance in Africa,” DPS, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 73–92, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.36615/dttqjd81. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. UN, United Nations e-Government Survey 2022: The Future of Digital Government, 1st ed. in United Nations e-Government Survey Series. Bloomfield: United Nations Publications, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. M. Ndiaye, R. G. Saade, and H. Liu, “Understanding the Impact of Digitalization Transition of Senegal and Its Implication on Human Health and Wellbeing,” Global Transitions, p. S2589791825000635, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.glt.2025.09.002. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. A. Acquah, “Digital inclusivity: exploring e-government use among businesses in Ghana,” TG, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 856–873, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1108/TG-05-2024-0112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. A. K. Abdulkareem, K. A. Oladimeji, A. A. Ishola, A. Adejumo, and Z. J. Abdulkareem, “Factors influencing the adoption of electronic identity in Nigeria,” JeDEM, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 108–129, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.29379/jedem.v16i1.858. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. P. Afieroho, R. Perkins, X. (Thomas) Zhou, B. Hoanca, and G. Protasel, “Adopting e-government to monitor public infrastructure projects execution in Nigeria: The public perspective,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 8, p. e18552, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18552. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Y. Alzoubi and A. Mishra, “A comparative analysis of e-government services in ten African countries,” JeDEM, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 172–200, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.29379/jedem.v17i3.1107. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. M. Olumekor, M. S. Mangai, O. S. Madumo, M. Mohiuddin, and S. N. Polbitsyn, “Influences on e‐governance in Africa: A study of economic, political, and infrastructural dynamics,” Public Administration, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 185–200, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1111/padm.13013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. K. A. Fröhlich, K. Jain, A. Pinomaa, and M. Nieminen, “Using a Public Value Management theory to identify features of citizen-centric e-governance in Namibia,” S. Afr. j. inf. manag., vol. 25, no. 1, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.4102/sajim.v25i1.1609. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. S. M. Nkgapele, “The Usability of e-Government as a Mechanism to Enhance Public Service Delivery in the South African Government: Lessons from Practices,” DPS, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 116–132, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.36615/w2sjk817. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. U. Detthamrong et al., “Thematic shifts in E-governance research: From foundational frameworks to emerging technologies,” Social Sciences & Humanities Open, vol. 12, p. 101888, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101888. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. S. Fel, J. Kozak, and P. Horodyski, “Responsibility and AI: Exploring technology acceptance models,” Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, vol. 10, no. 6, p. 100852, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2025.100852. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. A. T. Lee, R. K. Ramasamy, and A. Subbarao, “Understanding Psychosocial Barriers to Healthcare Technology Adoption: A Review of TAM Technology Acceptance Model and Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology and UTAUT Frameworks,” Healthcare, vol. 13, no. 3, p. 250, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.3390/healthcare13030250. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. N. Soininen, J. B. Ruhl, B. Cosens, and L. Gunderson, “Governing complexity: A comparative assessment of four governance models with applications to climate change mitigation and adaptation,” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, vol. 57, p. 101020, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2025.101020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. H. Aksom and I. Tymchenko, “How institutional theories explain and fail to explain organizations,” Journal of Organizational Change Management, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 1223–1252, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1108/JOCM-05-2019-0130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. M. Irpan, “Digital Government and Public Sector Organizational Performance: A Systematic Literature Review,” IJBAE, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 53–72, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.55927/ijbae.v5i1.549. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. R. M. Fifaliana, “A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Research on the Impact of E-Government Use on Citizens’ Trust in Government,” Chinese Public Administration Review, p. 15396754251413048, Feb. 2026, doi: 10.1177/15396754251413048. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. D. Asmawanti-S, N. N. Afiah, H. Ritchi, and H. Suharman, “Literature review of government digital services based on public value theory and citizen perspectives,” Cogent Business & Management, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 2518494, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1080/23311975.2025.2518494. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. S. Malodia, A. Dhir, M. Mishra, and Z. A. Bhatti, “Future of e-Government: An integrated conceptual framework,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 173, p. 121102, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. T. Greenhalgh, S. Thorne, and K. Malterud, “Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews?,” Eur J Clin Investigation, vol. 48, no. 6, p. e12931, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.1111/eci.12931. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. C. Baethge, S. Goldbeck-Wood, and S. Mertens, “SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles,” Res Integr Peer Rev, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 5, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1186/s41073-019-0064-8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. B. B. Muhammed, “At what cost are we bridging Africa’s digital divide?,” Global Voices. Accessed: Sep. 25, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://globalvoices.org/2025/01/18/at-what-cost-are-we-bridging-africas-digital-divide/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. D. Mountaineers, “Left Behind: The Digital Divide in Africa,” Brastorne. Accessed: Sep. 25, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://brastorne.com/resources/blog/left-behind-the-digital-divide-in-africa/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. H. Barasa, “Digital Government in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evolving Fast, Lacking Frameworks.” Accessed: Sep. 25, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://institute.global/insights/tech-and-digitalisation/digital-government-sub-saharan-africa-evolving-fast-lacking-frameworks [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. E. Mwema and A. Birhane, “Undersea cables in Africa: The new frontiers of digital colonialism,” FM, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.5210/fm.v29i4.13637. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Y. Luan, Q. T. Guan, and I. Ketu, “Unlocking Governance for Sustainability in the Digital Age: How E ‐Government Shapes Inclusive Human Development in Africa,” Sustainable Development, p. sd.70640, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.1002/sd.70640. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. K. Rarhoui, “An analysis of African E-Government Development: Trends and Challenges.,” African Scientific Journal, vol. 3, no. 22, pp. 445–445, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10695615. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. M. Sun, J. Liu, and J. Lu, “Digital Literacy in Africa: Exploring its Relationship with Infrastructure, Policy, and Social Inequality,” African Journalism Studies, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 204–225, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1080/23743670.2024.2329705. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Abdulbasit Imam, “Poor Internet Connectivity and its Implications on Nigeria’s e-Governance Trajectory,” 2024, doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30038.66884. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. K. Rarhoui, “E-government in Africa: Challenges and Prospects.” Feb. 2024. Accessed: Sep. 25, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://hal.science/hal-04450951 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. O. Ayodele, P. Plantinga, D. Sanchez-Bentacourt, S. Dlamini, and N. Dlamini, “How Do Researchers and Public Officials Co-Navigate e-Participation Implementation? An Action-Research Experience with South African Municipalities,” Systems, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 125, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.3390/systems13020125. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. IFAC, “E-Governance as an Anti-corruption Strategy: The Nigerian Experience | IFAC.” Accessed: Sep. 25, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.ifac.org/knowledge-gateway/discussion/e-governance-anti-corruption-strategy-nigerian-experience [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. N. Muhimpundu and C. Jianxun, “Citizens’ Perceptions on the Use of E-Government as an Effective Tool to fight Corruption in Rwanda: E-government and Corruption in Rwanda,” in Proceedings of the 2022 6th International Conference on E-Business and Internet, in ICEBI ’22. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, Mar. 2023, pp. 222–234. doi: 10.1145/3572647.3572681. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. A. Khan, S. Krishnan, and A. Dhir, “Electronic government and corruption: Systematic literature review, framework, and agenda for future research,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 167, p. 120737, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120737. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. C. Santiso, “Govtech against corruption: What are the integrity dividends of government digitalization?,” Data & Policy, vol. 4, p. e39, 2022, doi: 10.1017/dap.2022.31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. I. O. Adam, “Examining E-Government development effects on corruption in Africa: The mediating effects of ICT development and institutional quality,” Technology in Society, vol. 61, p. 101245, May 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101245. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. R. Ouedraogo and A. N. Sy, “Can Digitalization Help Deter Corruption in Africa?,” IMF Working Papers, vol. 2020, no. 068, May 2020, doi: 10.5089/9781513545691.001.A001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. M. A. Ismail, “The Role of E-Government on Corruption Control in Public Sector,” SSRN Journal, 2022, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4176404. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. CSIS, “Building Africa’s Digital Future,” Aug. 2024, Accessed: Sep. 26, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.csis.org/analysis/building-africas-digital-future [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. B. Reuben-Owoh and E. Haig, “A Systematic Review of Voluntary Cybersecurity Standards and Frameworks,” Int. J. Inf. Secur., vol. 24, no. 5, p. 206, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10207-025-01121-0. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. INTERPOL, “New INTERPOL report warns of sharp rise in cybercrime in Africa.” Accessed: Sep. 26, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.interpol.int/en/News-and-Events/News/2025/New-INTERPOL-report-warns-of-sharp-rise-in-cybercrime-in-Africa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. DigWatch, “ECOWAS Regional Cybersecurity and Cybercrime Strategy | Digital Watch Observatory.” Accessed: Sep. 26, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://dig.watch/resource/ecowas-regional-cybersecurity-and-cybercrime-strategy [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. L. Weigl, T. Roth, A. Amard, and L. Zavolokina, “When public values and user-centricity in e-government collide – A systematic review,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 41, no. 3, p. 101956, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2024.101956. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. R. Asiama, “E-Government Development in Ghana.” Accessed: Sep. 27, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://we.hse.ru/en/irs/cas/passgh [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. F. Annan, “Digital public services delivery in Ghana,” Brookings. Accessed: Sep. 27, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/digital-public-services-delivery-in-ghana/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. D. Masumo-Gwebente and J. Phiri, “Factors Affecting the Uptake of E-Government Services on the Government Services Bus (GSB) in Developing Countries. A Case Study of Ministry of Lands and Natural Resources in Zambia,” OJBM, vol. 10, no. 06, pp. 3100–3113, 2022, doi: 10.4236/ojbm.2022.106154. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. P. Gupta, A. Hooda, A. Jeyaraj, J. J. M. Seddon, and Y. K. Dwivedi, “Trust, Risk, Privacy and Security in e-Government Use: Insights from a MASEM Analysis,” Inf Syst Front, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 1089–1105, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10796-024-10497-8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. School of Information Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA, M. Raji, D. Wilder, V. Ugwuoke, and M. Bashir, “An assessment of the enforcement mechanisms in African data protection laws,” AJPDP, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–40, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.29053/ajpdp.v2i1.0002. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. I. Juma and B. Faturoti, “Enforcing data privacy in Kenya and Nigeria: towards an African approach to regulatory practice,” International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, pp. 1–26, May 2025, doi: 10.1080/13600869.2025.2506918. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. A. Owusu, C. E. Akpe-Doe, and I. H. Taana, “Assessing the Effectiveness of E-Government Services in Ghana: A Case of the Registrar General’s Department,” International Journal of Electronic Government Research, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–23, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.4018/IJEGR.289827. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. S. Anomah, “Assessing the institutional readiness and capacity for AI adoption in public audit institutions in developing countries: evidence from Ghana,” Telematics and Informatics Reports, vol. 20, p. 100260, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.teler.2025.100260. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. S. Nookhao and S. Kiattisin, “Achieving a successful e-government: Determinants of behavioral intention from Thai citizens’ perspective,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 8, p. e18944, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18944. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. R. F. Rhamadhani and F. O. Edeh, “Citizen Participation and Digital Governance in Public Sector Accountability,” ijat, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 200–210, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.61194/ijat.v2i4.715. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. K. Olesen, L. C. Wood, and J. L. L. Chong, “Citizen Adoption in E-Government Systems: A Meta Analysis,” Journal of Global Information Management, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1–28, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.4018/JGIM.294124. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. H. Pittri, G. A. G. R. Godawatte, O. P. Esangbedo, P. Antwi-Afari, and Z. Bao, “Exploring Barriers to the Adoption of Digital Technologies for Circular Economy Practices in the Construction Industry in Developing Countries: A Case of Ghana,” Buildings, vol. 15, no. 7, p. 1090, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.3390/buildings15071090. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. M. M. Alhaji et al., “Motivators and barriers to the uptake of digital health platforms for family planning services in Lagos, Nigeria: A mixed-methods study,” DIGITAL HEALTH, vol. 11, p. 20552076251349624, May 2025, doi: 10.1177/20552076251349624. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Smart Iot Device for Weather And Health
• Merlarchive: A Web-Based Academic Hub for UDM With AI-Powered Natural Language Processing
• Enhanced Social Network Security System: Integrating Biometric Authentication for Improved User Verification and Privacy Protection
• Smart Budget Allocation in Public Policy: A Data-Driven Approach for Equitable Resource Distribution
• Decision Support System for Faculty Selection, Promotion, and Reclassification Using Predictive Analytics