Effect of Task-Specific Hand Dexterity Circuit Training as an Adjunct to Conventional Physiotherapy on Pain and Functional Disability in Individuals with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Authors

Harshada Wasade

Department of Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy, Datta Meghe College of Physiotherapy, Nagpur, Maharashtra (India)

Asavari Barshikar

Department of Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy, Datta Meghe College of Physiotherapy, Nagpur, Maharashtra (India)

Vedanti Bhure

Department of Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy, Datta Meghe College of Physiotherapy, Nagpur, Maharashtra (India)

Khushi Gelda

Department of Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy, Datta Meghe College of Physiotherapy, Nagpur, Maharashtra (India)

Rajas Mudey

Department of Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy, Datta Meghe College of Physiotherapy, Nagpur, Maharashtra (India)

Pratiksha Sayam

Department of Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy, Datta Meghe College of Physiotherapy, Nagpur, Maharashtra (India)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.110200088

Subject Category: Applied Sciences

Volume/Issue: 11/2 | Page No: 1030-1035

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-02-21

Accepted: 2026-02-26

Published: 2026-03-14

Abstract

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune inflammatory disorder predominantly affecting small joints of the hands, leading to pain, deformity, and functional disability. Conventional physiotherapy focuses primarily on pain relief and strengthening; however, structured task-specific dexterity training targeting functional hand activities remains underexplored.
Objective: To evaluate the effect of task-specific hand dexterity circuit training as an adjunct to conventional physiotherapy on pain and functional disability in individuals with rheumatoid arthritis.
Methods: A quasi-experimental comparative study was conducted over 12 months in a tertiary care teaching hospital. One hundred participants diagnosed with RA (ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria) were recruited through convenience sampling and allocated into experimental (n=50) and control (n=50) groups. Both groups received supervised physiotherapy sessions (40 minutes/day, 5 days/week) for four weeks. The control group received conventional physiotherapy, while the experimental group received 15 minutes of conventional therapy followed by 25 minutes of task-specific hand dexterity circuit training. Pain intensity was assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and functional disability using the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI). Paired and independent t-tests were used for statistical analysis (p<0.05).
Results: Both groups showed significant within-group improvements (p<0.001). The experimental group demonstrated greater reduction in NPRS (6.9±1.2 to 3.1±0.9) compared to the control group (6.8±1.1 to 4.8±1.0). HAQ-DI scores improved significantly in the experimental group (1.86±0.38 to 1.15±0.26) compared to the control group (1.82±0.36 to 1.50±0.32) (p<0.001).
Conclusion: Task-specific hand dexterity circuit training combined with conventional physiotherapy provides clinically meaningful improvements in pain and functional disability in individuals with rheumatoid arthritis.

Keywords

Rheumatoid arthritis, hand dexterity, circuit training, Task-specific training

Downloads

References

1. Smolen JS, Aletaha D, McInnes IB. Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet. 2016;388(10055):2023-2038. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Chopra A, Abdel-Nasser A. Epidemiology of rheumatic diseases in India. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008;47(4):460-464. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Aletaha D, Smolen JS. Diagnosis and management of rheumatoid arthritis. JAMA. 2018;320(13):1360-1372. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. McInnes IB, Schett G. The pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:2205-2219. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bruce B, Fries JF. The Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005;23(S39):S14-S18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Hawker GA, et al. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale and Numeric Rating Scale. Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63(S11):S240-S252. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hurkmans EJ, et al. Exercise therapy in rheumatoid arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(4):CD006853. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. French B, et al. Repetitive task training for improving functional ability. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(11):CD006073 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Rausch Osthoff AK, et al. Effects of exercise therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Arthritis Care Res. 2018;70(4):484–499. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Metsios GS, et al. Physical activity and inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis. Autoimmun Rev. 2020;19(3):102491. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Williams MA, et al. Hand exercise therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: Systematic review. J Hand Ther. 2019;32(2):145–156. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Lamb SE, Williamson EM, et al. Long-term clinical effectiveness of hand exercise in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018;57(10):1782–1791. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Vaegter HB, et al. Exercise-induced hypoalgesia: Mechanisms and clinical implications. Pain Rep. 2020;5(5):e823. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Gleeson M, et al. The anti-inflammatory effects of exercise. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11:607–615. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kleim JA, Jones TA. Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;51:S225–S239. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kibler WB, et al. Role of proximal stability in upper limb function. Sports Med. 2006;36(3):189–198. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Sveaas SH, et al. Exercise and functional rehabilitation in rheumatoid arthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2021;35(2):101682. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Cooney JK, et al. Benefits of exercise in rheumatoid arthritis. J Aging Res. 2011;2011:681640. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles