Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Learners with Limited Academic Proficiency: An Analytical Review in STEM Higher Education

This analytical review explores the effectiveness of Artificial Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) for academically underprepared learners in STEM higher education. The study synthesises recent advancements in generative AI and ITS, examining their potential to deliver personalised instruction, adaptive feedback, and scalable learning environments. It highlights the architectural components and operational mechanisms of ITS, evaluating their strengths in fostering academic improvement. The paper identifies key limitations including challenges in real-time adaptability, equitable access, and ethical data management, as well as concerns regarding the reliability of online assessments and the ability of ITS to replicate nuanced human guidance. The review calls for future research on emotion-aware computing, collaborative learning, explainable AI, emphasising the necessity for ethical, transparent, and accessible ITS solutions. Ultimately, the article argues that while ITS platforms hold significant promise for transforming STEM education and supporting underprepared learners, their success depend on continual innovation, robust evaluation, and a commitment to educational equity and excellence.

Intelligent Tutoring System, STEM Education, Higher Education

1. Bengesi S, et al. Advancements in generative AI: A comprehensive review of GANs, GPT, autoencoders, diffusion model, and transformers. IEEE Access. 2024;12:69812–69837. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Lin H. Influences of artificial intelligence in education on teaching effectiveness: The mediating effect of teachers’ perceptions of educational technology. Int J Emerg Technol Learn. 2022;17(24):144–156. doi:10.3991/ijet.v17i24.36037 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Lo CK. What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Educ Sci. 2023;13(4):410. doi:10.3390/educsci13040410 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Mai DTT, Da CV, Hanh NV. The use of ChatGPT in teaching and learning: A systematic review through SWOT analysis approach. Front Educ. 2024;9. doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1328769 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Tang KY, Chang CY, Hwang GJ. Trends in artificial intelligence-supported e-learning: A systematic review and co-citation network analysis (1998–2019). Interact Learn Environ. 2023;31(4):2134–2152. doi:10.1080/10494820.2021.1875001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Zhang K, Aslan AB. AI technologies for education: Recent research & future directions. Comput Educ Artif Intell. 2021;2:100025. doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chan CKY, Tsi LHY. The AI revolution in education: Will AI replace or assist teachers in higher education? arXiv [Preprint]. 2023. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2305.01185 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Edwards BI, Cheok AD. Why not robot teachers: Artificial intelligence for addressing teacher shortage. Appl Artif Intell. 2018;32(4):345–360. doi:10.1080/08839514.2018.1464286 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Creely E, Blannin J. The implications of generative AI for creative composition in higher education and initial teacher education. In: Cochrane T, et al., editors. ASCILITE 2023 conference proceedings: People, partnerships and pedagogies; 2023. p. 357–361. doi:10.14742/apubs.2023.618 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Denny P, Prather J, Becker BA, Finnie-Ansley J, Hellas A, Leinonen J, et al. Computing education in the era of generative AI. Commun ACM. 2024;67(2):56–67. doi:10.1145/3624720 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Makkubhai IM, Afreen M, Makkubhai JI. Enhancing educational pedagogy through intelligent systems: Harnessing artificial intelligence for advancing progressive teaching practices. In: Proceedings; 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Abbas N, Ali I, Manzoor R, Hussain T, Hussain MHA. Role of artificial intelligence tools in enhancing students’ educational performance at higher levels. 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kurni M, Mohammed MS, Srinivasa KG. Intelligent tutoring systems. In: A beginner’s guide to introduce artificial intelligence in teaching and learning. Cham: Springer; 2023. p. 29–44. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kolekar SV, Pai RM, Pai MMM. Rule based adaptive user interface for adaptive e-learning system. Educ Inf Technol. 2019. doi:10.1007/s10639-018-9788-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Nimy E, Mosia M, Chibaya C. Identifying at-risk students for early intervention: A probabilistic machine learning approach. Appl Sci. 2023. doi:10.3390/app13063869 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Tian J, Chen S, Zhang X, Wang X, Feng Z. Reducing sentiment bias in pre-trained sentiment classification via adaptive gumbel attack. In: Proc 37th AAAI Conf Artif Intell. 2023;37. doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i11.26599 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Descalço L, Carvalho P, Oliveira P. Motivating study before classes on flipped learning. In: EDULEARN18 Proceedings. 2018;1. doi:10.21125/edulearn.2018.1497 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Turan Z, Yilmaz RM. Are MOOCs a new way of learning in engineering education in light of the literature? A systematic review and bibliometric analysis. J Eng Educ. 2024. doi:10.1002/jee.20580 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Septian A, Ramadhanty CL, Darhim, Prabawanto S. Mathematical problem solving ability and student interest in learning using Google Classroom. In: Proc Int Conf Educ Suryakancana; 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Dari SS, Dhabliya D, Govindaraju K, Dhablia A, Mahalle PN. Data privacy in the digital era: Machine learning solutions for confidentiality. In: E3S Web Conf. 2024;491. doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202449102024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Naya-Forcano A, Villegas Ch W, Mera Navarrete A, Buenano Fernandez D, Maldonado Navarro A. Adaptive intelligent tutoring systems for STEM education: Analysis of the learning impact and effectiveness of personalized feedback. Smart Learn Environ. 2025;12:41. doi:10.1186/s40561-02500389-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Ouyang F, Xu W. The effects of educational robotics in STEM education: A multilevel meta-analysis. 2024. doi:10.1186/s40594-024-00469-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Hurley M, Butler D, McLoughlin E. STEM teacher professional learning through immersive STEM learning placements in industry: A systematic literature review. J STEM Educ Res. 2024. doi:10.1007/s41979-023-00089-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Naya-Forcano A, et al. ChatPLT: An intelligent tutoring system for teaching Physics in higher education. In: 10th Int Conf Higher Educ Adv (HEAd’24); 2024; Valencia, Spain. doi:10.4995/HEAd24.2024.17261 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study