Effectiveness of Breastfeeding Support Packages in Low- And Middle-Income Countries for Infants Under Six Months: A Systematic Review
Authors
Department of Public Health, Nimba University Sanniquellie City, Nimba County Liberia (Liberia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.11090023
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 11/9 | Page No: 267-276
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-09-12
Accepted: 2026-09-17
Published: 2026-10-03
Abstract
INTRODUCTION:
Breastfeeding is crucial for improving infant health and survival, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where malnutrition and infectious diseases are prevalent. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends exclusive breastfeeding throughout the first six months of a baby's life, but many mothers in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) faced challenges. This systematic analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of breastfeeding assistance programs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in promoting exclusive breastfeeding of infants younger than six months.
METHOD:
In compliance with the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols) statement, we created and adhered to a standard systematic review protocol (PROSPERO 2018, CRD42018102795).
Result-PRISMA FLOW DIAGRAM:
The search results and the selection process were shown. The search turned up 15,256 records. After duplicates were removed and titles and abstracts were reviewed, 16 of the 155 entries that were available in "abstract only" form could be read in full. Out of the 139 remaining records, 98 did not meet the inclusion criteria. The last 41 studies were included in the primary analysis. (Iwasaki and others, 2021)
Conclusion:
Future feeding decisions for young, nutritionally vulnerable infants under six months are not well-informed. Nonetheless, a lot of the knowledge gained from treatments that target a broader spectrum of newborns and infants under six meters can be applied. It has been demonstrated that the breastfeeding counseling, education, training, promotion, and peer support packages improve breastfeeding outcomes.
. All infants under six months old can use the packages in our review as "primary prevention" therapy. It is possible that the same packets, with only minor modifications, can also sustain small/at-risk infants under 6 m, albeit formal research is needed to validate their effectiveness for this demographic. Future research of this kind ought to concentrate on results that have clinical significance.(Spiga and others, 2024)
Key Words:
Breastfeeding, Breastfeeding exclusively, baby health, peer support, .
Keywords
Breastfeeding, Breastfeeding exclusively, baby health, peer support, .
Downloads
References
1. The systematic study titled "Effectiveness of Breastfeeding Support Packages in Low- and Middle-Income Countries for Infants under Six Months" has the following references. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Rana, R., Kerac, M., McGrath, M., Sharma, E., and Gupta, P. (2021). A comprehensive study of the effectiveness of breastfeeding assistance packages for infants under six months old in low- and middle-income countries. 13(2) Nutrients 681. The URL is 10.3390/nu13020681. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Lee, M., Binns, C., and Low, W. Y. (2016). The long-term advantages of breastfeeding for public health. Journal of Public Health Asia-Pacific, 28(1), 7–14. 10.1177/1010539515624964 is the URL to be used. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Rollins, N. C., Richter, L. M., Piwoz, E. G., Horton, S., Bhandari, N., Hajeebhoy, N., Lutter, C. K., Martines, J. C., & Victora, C. G. (2016). What steps must be taken to enhance breastfeeding behaviors, and why invest? 387(10017) The Lancet, 491-504. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01044-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. C. G. Victora, R. Bahl, A. J. D. Barros, G. V. A. França, S. Horton, J. Krasevec, S. Murch, M. J. Sankar, N. Walker, & N. Rollins (2016). The 21st-century breastfeeding epidemic: causes, processes, and long-term effects. The Lancet, Volume 387, Issue 10017, pages 475–490. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01024-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Taneja, S., Mazumder, S., Rollins, N., Bhandari, N., Martines, J., Sinha, B., Chowdhury, R., Sankar, M. J., & Bahl, R. (2015). A meta-analysis and systematic review were conducted to enhance the results of breastfeeding interventions. 114–134 in Acta Paediatrica, 104(467). 10.1111/apa.13127 can be found here. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Nankunda, J., Tumwine, J. K., Ndeezi, G., & Tylleskär, T. (2010). Community based peer counsellors for support of exclusive breastfeeding: Experiences from rural Uganda. International Breastfeeding Journal, 5(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4358-5-19 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study