Exploring the Critical Factors Influencing Behavioural Intention to Use Educational Applications in India: A Lesson from an Emerging Market

Authors

Anil Kumar

Jamia Hamdard/ Management Department (India)

Dr. Abdullah

Jamia Hamdard/ Management Department (India)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.11070094

Subject Category: Finance and Management

Volume/Issue: 11/7 | Page No: 1361-1366

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-22

Accepted: 2026-07-27

Published: 2026-08-06

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to inspect the acceptance of educational application by the students in higher education. The (TAM) technology acceptance model was extended to include excitement to use technological devices laptops ipad’s for educational application operationalized as enjoyment as well as social influence in a field study involving the adoption of technological devices. Survey data were collected from 170 college students and analysed using TAM). The result indicates that excitement and performance expectations were important factors influencing the acceptance of educational application in this context. For those engagement in the educational application learning pilot project upon which the study was based, the use of the TAM and result provided a theory based empirical approach to support the evaluation that the pilot project aims were achieved. All-inclusive, students perceived technological devices to be useful and entertaining tools for fulfil tasks and enhance learning outcomes.

Keywords

Excitement; laptops technological devices; TAM technological acceptance model

Downloads

References

1. O'bannon, B. W., & Thomas, K. (2014). Teacher perceptions of using mobile phones in the classroom: Age matters!. Computers & Education, 74, 15-25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abachi, H. R., & Muhammad, G. (2014). The impact of m-learning technology on students and educators. Computers in human behavior, 30, 491-496. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Kiat, L. B., Abd Halim, M. N. D., Ibrahim, M. H. B., & Ali, M. M. B. CHARACTERISTIC OF MOBILE DEVICE AND FACTORS OF DEVELOP MOBILE APPLICATION IN EDUCATION. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Al-Emran, M., Elsherif, H. M., & Shaalan, K. (2016). Investigating attitudes towards the use of mobile learning in higher education. Computers in Human behavior, 56, 93-102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Dahlstrom, T. R. (2013). Telecommuting and leadership style. Public personnel management, 42(3), 438-451. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Kim, S. H., Mims, C., & Holmes, K. P. (2006). An introduction to current trends and benefits of mobile wireless technology use in higher education. AACE Review (Formerly AACE Journal), 14(1), 77-100. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hirsh-Pasek, K., Zosh, J. M., Golinkoff, R. M., Gray, J. H., Robb, M. B., & Kaufman, J. (2015). Putting education in “educational” apps: Lessons from the science of learning. Psychological science in the public interest, 16(1), 3-34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Papadakis, S., Vaiopoulou, J., Kalogiannakis, M., & Stamovlasis, D. (2020). Developing and exploring an evaluation tool for educational apps (ETEA) targeting kindergarten children. Sustainability, 12(10), 4201. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles