Factors Influencing Quantity Surveyors' Involvement in the Delivery of Sustainable Housing Projects in Nigeria

As demand for sustainable development grows globally, role of Quantity Surveyors in integrating sustainability into construction processes has become vital. This study therefore investigates the Factors Influencing Quantity Surveyors' Involvement in the Delivery of Sustainable Housing Projects in Nigeria. The study comprises a sample of 48 Quantity Surveyors who had participated in sustainable housing projects. They were selected using the Respondent Driven Sampling technique. Data gotten from the questionnaires were analyzed using amongst others, mean score test, analysis of variance and factor analysis.
The study reveals that Quantity Surveyors' involvement in sustainable housing projects in Lagos is driven by a complex interplay of factors. Continuous professional development, technological advancements, and market demands emerge here as key drivers. Quantity surveyors are willing participants in this new era of technological advancement, this finding cements the importance of ongoing learning and skill enhancement in adapting to the evolving demands of sustainable construction.
The originality lies in its exploration of the factors influencing the involvement of Quantity Surveyors in the delivery of sustainable housing projects, offering novel perspectives on how these factors can pave the way for transformative improvements in construction sector. The study provides empirical insights into factors that can aid Quantity Surveyors involvement in the delivery of sustainable housing projects in the construction industry and beyond.

Delivery, Construction, Economic, Environment

1. Adesoji, D.J. (2011) Achieving Sustainable Housing Development in Nigeria: A Critical Challenge to Governance, International Journal of Humanities and Social Science 1(9), 121-123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ahmed A. A, Yacim J. A, Umar D. Y & Musa U. D. (2022). The challenges of sustainable buildings in Nigeria. International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development, 13(4), 488-489 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alwan, Z., Jones, P., & Holgate, P. (2017). Strategic sustainable development in the UK construction industry, through the framework for strategic sustainable development, using Building Information Modelling. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140 (2), 349-358. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Arif, M., Egbu, C., Haleem, A., Kulonda, D. and Khalfan, M. (2009). State of green construction in India: drivers and challenges. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 7(2), 223-234. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Babangida, I., Bala, K., & Bustani, S. A. (2012). A review of household's willingness-to-pay for green building features in residential properties. Journal of Sustainable Development, 5(8), 85-87. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ball, J. (2002). Can ISO 14000 and eco-labelling turn the construction industry green? Building and environment, 37(4), 421-428. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Banani, R., Vahdati, M. M., Shahrestani, M., & Clements-Croome, D. (2016). The development of building assessment criteria framework for sustainable non-residential buildings in Saudi Arabia. Sustainable Cities and Society, 26, 289-305. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Berardi, U. (2011). Beyond sustainability assessment systems: Upgrading topics by enlarging the scale of assessment. International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development, 2(4), 276-282 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Chau, C. K., Leung, T. M., & Ng, W. Y. (2015). A review on life cycle assessment, life cycle energy assessment and life cycle carbon emissions assessment on buildings. Applied energy, 143, 395-413 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Chong, B.L., Lee, W.P. and Lim, C.C. (2012). The Roles of Graduate Quantity Surveyors in the Malaysian Construction Industry. International Conference on Management and Education Innovation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Emuze, F., & Smallwood, J. (2014). Collaborative working in South African construction: Contractors' perspectives. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 12(3), 294-306. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. European Commission. (2021). The European Green Deal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Goh, B. H., & Sun, Y. (2016). The development of life-cycle costing for buildings. Building Research & Information, 44(3), 319-333. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Johnson, R. A. & Wichern, D. W. (2022). Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Leo-Olagbaye F. (2024). Motivating Factors for the Delivery of Sustainable Housing Projects in Nigeria. Ibadan Planning Journal, 10(1), 16-28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Leo-Olagbaye, F.,Odeyinka, H.,Rathnasiri, P. (2023). Stakeholders’ Roles in the Delivery of Sustainable Housing Projects in Lagos State, Nigeria. Journal of Sustainability 15(5): 1-22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Leo-Olagbaye, F. and Odeyinka, H.A. (2022). Conceptualizing Sustainability Housing Development and Construction. In: Ogunkan, D., Fakolade, O., Adejare, Q., Orekan, A., Oyeyipo, O., Edike, U. and Alabi, A. (Eds.) Emerging Issues in Nigeria’s Built Enviroment, College of Environmental Sciences, Bells University of Technology, Ota, Nigeria, 104-116 ISBN: 978-187-658-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Patten, M. L. (2016). Questionnaire Research: A Practical Guide. 4th ed. New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Petrovic, B. (2019). Life cycle assessment in the construction sector: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 101, 26-42. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Tay, W. D. (2015) The Transition of Paradigms of the Quantity Surveying Profession: Relevancy, Competencies and Beyond. In: Proceedings of the HKIS and AIQS Joint Conference – How QS Will succeed in Tomorrow’s World, Nov. 2015, HK, 10 – 16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Häkkinen, T., & Belloni, K. (2011). Barriers and drivers for sustainable building. Building Research & Information, 39(3), 239-255. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Hyun, S., & Jang, W. S. (2020). Sustainable real estate development financing: The role of green bonds. Sustainability, 12(10), 4256-4273. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Nguyen, T. H., Shehab, T., & Gao, Z. (2010). Evaluating sustainability of architectural designs using building information modeling. The Open Construction and Building Technology Journal, 4(1), 202-246. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Olawumi, T. O., & Chan, D. W. (2018). Identifying and prioritizing the benefits of integrating BIM and sustainability practices in construction projects: A Delphi survey of international experts. Sustainable Cities and Society, 40, 16-27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Valdes-Vasquez, R. and Klotz, L.E. (2012). Social sustainability considerations during planning and design: Framework of processes for construction projects. Journal of construction engineering and management, 139(1), 80-89. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Zabihi, H., Habib, F., & Mirsaeedie, L. (2013). Sustainability in building and construction: Revising definitions and concepts. International Journal of Ecology & Development, 23(3), 2-13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Eco-Microcredit and Rural Transformation: The Mediating Role of Sustainable Farming Practices and the Moderating Effect of Financial Literacy on Household Sustainability
• Comparative Analysis of Traditional and Innovative Methods for Rare Earth Element Extraction
• Global Trends in Sustainability Reporting: A Malaysian Evidence
• Blockchain for Transparency: Tracking Zero-Waste Practices Across the Fashion Value Chain in Bangladesh
• Entrepreneurship and the Path to Globalizing Jamdani Weaving: Tradition, Innovation, and Sustainable Digital Practices