Family Business in India

Authors

Vedant V. Pandya ORCID icon for Vedant V. Pandya

Department of Business Administration, M. K. Bhavnagar University, Bhavnagar (India)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.11080006

Subject Category: Management

Volume/Issue: 11/8 | Page No: 105-124

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-14

Accepted: 2026-08-19

Published: 2026-08-27

Abstract

Family business constitutes one of the oldest and most pervasive forms of economic organization in human history, yet its recognition as a distinct field of rigorous scholarly inquiry is a comparatively recent phenomenon that has matured substantially only since the late 1980s. This paper undertakes a synthesis of the body of knowledge on family business, tracing its intellectual origination, its theoretical evolution and its ongoing development as a legitimate and increasingly rigorous sub-field of management and entrepreneurship scholarship. Drawing upon foundational and contemporary literature, the paper examines the definitional and measurement controversies that have historically fragmented the field (Astrachan et al., 2002; Chua et al., 1999; Litz, 1995), explicates the principal theoretical models scholars have deployed to explain family business phenomena, including the three-circle systems model (Tagiuri & Davis, 1996), the resource-based and familiness perspectives (Habbershon & Williams, 1999; Habbershon et al., 2003), agency and stewardship theorizing (Schulze et al., 2003) and the socioemotional wealth approach (Berrone et al., 2012; Gomez-Mejia et al., 2007) and articulates the principal typologies along which family firms are classified. The review protocol reported using a PRISMA-informed identification-screening-eligibility-inclusion structure adapted for narrative synthesis (Page et al., 2021; Tranfield et al., 2003), draws on 45 sources identified across six databases and screened against explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria. A comparative cross-national analysis, grounded in scholarly criteria of legal origin, ownership concentration and cultural embeddedness (La Porta et al., 1999; Faccio & Lang, 2002; Claessens et al., 2000), briefly situates family business across selected countries before the paper turns to its central contribution: a focused, empirically updated and analytically distinctive examination of family business in India (Sarkar, 2010; Sarkar & Selarka, 2021; Renuka & Marath, 2023). This India-specific analysis develops an original comparative conceptual framework mapping Indian institutional, cultural, governance and social-capital characteristics onto established family-business theories, supported by comparative tables of ownership structure, governance mechanisms and succession challenges. The paper concludes by identifying persistent unanswered questions and an agenda for future scholarly inquiry.

Keywords

family business, family firm, familiness, socioemotional wealth, three-circle model, corporate governance, social capital, business groups

Downloads

References

1. Aldrich, H. E., & Cliff, J. E. (2003). The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(5), 573–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00011-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301–1328. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00567 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Arregle, J.-L., Hitt, M. A., Sirmon, D. G., & Very, P. (2007). The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1), 73–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00665.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Astrachan, J. H., & Shanker, M. C. (2003). Family businesses' contribution to the U.S. economy: A closer look. Family Business Review, 16(3), 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944865030160030601 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Astrachan, J. H., Klein, S. B., & Smyrnios, K. X. (2002). The F-PEC scale of family influence: A proposal for solving the family business definition problem. Family Business Review, 15(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2002.00045.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486511435355 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bertrand, M., & Schoar, A. (2006). The role of family in family firms. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2), 73–96. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.20.2.73 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cambridge Family Enterprise Group. (n.d.). About Cambridge Family Enterprise Group. Retrieved August 16, 2026, from https://cfeg.com/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Chandler, A. D. (1990). Scale and scope: The dynamics of industrial capitalism. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Sharma, P. (2005). Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(5), 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00098.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., & Sharma, P. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(4), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879902300402 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. H. P. (2000). The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1–2), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00067-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Colli, A. (2003). The history of family business, 1850–2000. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Deloitte Private. (2024). Resilience and growth: Perspectives of Indian business. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Faccio, M., & Lang, L. H. P. (2002). The ultimate ownership of Western European corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 65(3), 365–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00146-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Family Firm Institute. (n.d.-a). Directory of educational centers. Retrieved August 16, 2026, from https://www.ffi.org/directories/education-centers/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Family Firm Institute. (n.d.-b). About FFI. Retrieved August 16, 2026, from https://www.ffi.org/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Gersick, K. E., Davis, J. A., Hampton, M. M., & Lansberg, I. (1997). Generation to generation: Life cycles of the family business. Harvard Business School Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Nunez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J. L., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106–137. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.1.106 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Habbershon, T. G., & Williams, M. L. (1999). A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review, 12(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1999.00001.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Habbershon, T. G., Williams, M., & MacMillan, I. C. (2003). A unified systems perspective of family firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 451–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00053-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Handler, W. C. (1989). Methodological issues and considerations in studying family businesses. Family Business Review, 2(3), 257–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1989.00257.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Handler, W. C. (1994). Succession in family business: A review of the research. Family Business Review, 7(2), 133–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1994.00133.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. IMD. (n.d.). Global Family Business Center. Retrieved August 16, 2026, from https://www.imd.org/centers/gfbc/imd-family-business-center/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. (1997). Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 75(4), 41–51. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. (2000). Is group affiliation profitable in emerging markets? An analysis of diversified Indian business groups. Journal of Finance, 55(2), 867–891. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00229 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00115 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Le Breton-Miller, I., & Miller, D. (2006). Why do some family businesses out-compete? Governance, long-term orientations and sustainable capability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(6), 731–746. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00147.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Litz, R. A. (1995). The family business: Toward definitional clarity. Family Business Review, 8(2), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1995.00071.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2005). Managing for the long run: Lessons in competitive advantage from great family businesses. Harvard Business School Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Morck, R., Wolfenzon, D., & Yeung, B. (2005). Corporate governance, economic entrenchment and growth. Journal of Economic Literature, 43(3), 655–720. https://doi.org/10.1257/002205105774431252 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Pearson, A. W., Carr, J. C., & Shaw, J. C. (2008). Toward a theory of familiness: A social capital perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(6), 949–969. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00265.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Renuka, V. V., & Marath, B. (2023). Impact of effective governance structure on succession process in the family business: Exploring the mediating role of management succession planning. Rajagiri Management Journal, 17(1), 84–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAMJ-06-2021-0048 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Sarkar, J. (2010). Business groups in India. In A. M. Colpan, T. Hikino, & J. R. Lincoln (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of business groups (pp. 294–321). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Sarkar, J., & Selarka, E. (2021). Women on board and performance of family firms: Evidence from India. Emerging Markets Review, 46, 100770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2020.100770 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., & Dino, R. N. (2003). Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 473–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00054-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Sharma, P. (2004). An overview of the field of family business studies: Current status and directions for the future. Family Business Review, 17(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2004.00001.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. S. P. Jain Institute of Management and Research. (2023). India: State of family business report 2023. SPJIMR Centre for Family Business & Entrepreneurship. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Subramanian, S. (2022). Importance of socioemotional wealth in Indian family business group: The case of Tata Group. South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, 11(2), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/09718907221125964 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Tagiuri, R., & Davis, J. A. (1996). Bivalent attributes of the family firm. Family Business Review, 9(2), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1996.00199.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics, 80(2), 385–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.12.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Ward, J. L. (1987). Keeping the family business healthy: How to plan for continuing growth, profitability and family leadership. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Westhead, P., & Cowling, M. (1998). Family firm research: The need for a methodological rethink. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(1), 31–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879802300102 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Zahra, S. A. (2003). International expansion of U.S. manufacturing family businesses: The effect of ownership and involvement. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 495–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00057-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Zellweger, T. M., Nason, R. S., & Nordqvist, M. (2012). From longevity of firms to transgenerational entrepreneurship of families: Introducing family entrepreneurial orientation. Family Business Review, 25(2), 136–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486511423531 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles