Heuristic and Algorithmic Approaches to Algebraic Problem Solving in Secondary Schools in Bayelsa State, Nigeria

This study is a comparative experimental study of heuristic and algorithmic approaches to algebraic problem solving in secondary schools in Bayelsa State. The study discussed the problems of algebraic reasoning and some over-reliance on memorizing procedures that have been raised in the teaching of mathematics in secondary schools. This study in particular examined the achievement and retention differences between students taught using heuristic versus algorithmic methods. Quasi experimental pretest, posttest and retention test design was used with 240 students of Senior Secondary School Two from six public secondary schools. The data were obtained from the results of Algebraic Problem Solving Achievement Test, which was validated by mathematics education and educational measurement experts. Data was analyzed using Mean, SD and ANCOVA. Results showed that the students taught using heuristic instructional approach obtained the higher post test scores and had higher retention ability as compared to students taught by algorithmic approaches. It was concluded from the study that the heuristic instruction facilitated deep concept understanding, strategic thinking and retention in algebraic problem solving more than the conventional procedural instruction. The study suggested that there is a need to incorporate heuristic instructional approach in secondary school mathematics teaching and learning to enhance students' analytical ability and performance in solving mathematical problem.

Heuristic Approach, Algorithmic Approach, Algebraic, Problem-Solving, Secondary Schools.

1. Abualigah, L., Almotairi, K. H., & Elaziz, M. A. (2023). Multilevel thresholding image segmentation using meta-heuristic optimization algorithms: Comparative analysis, open challenges and new trends. Applied Intelligence, 53(10), 11654-11704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-04064-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alsattar, H. A., Zaidan, A. A., & Zaidan, B. B. (2020). Novel meta-heuristic bald eagle search optimisation algorithm. Artificial Intelligence Review, 53(3), 2237-2264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-019-09732-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Braik, M., Sheta, A., & Al-Hiary, H. (2020). A novel meta-heuristic search algorithm for solving optimization problems: capuchin search algorithm. Neural computing and applications, 33(7), 2515-2547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05145-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Dereli, S., & Köker, R. (2020). A meta-heuristic proposal for inverse kinematics solution of 7-DOF serial robotic manipulator: quantum behaved particle swarm algorithm. Artificial Intelligence Review, 53(2), 949-964. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ekinci,Ay, Ş., E., & Garip, Z. (2023). A comparative analysis of meta-heuristic optimization algorithms for feature selection on ML-based classification of heart-related diseases: Ş. Ay et al. The Journal of Supercomputing, 79(11), 11797-11826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-023-05132-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ghasemi, M., Zare, M., Zahedi, A., Akbari, M. A., Mirjalili, S., & Abualigah, L. (2024). Geyser inspired algorithm: a new geological-inspired meta-heuristic for real-parameter and constrained engineering optimization. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 21(1), 374-408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-023-00437-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ghiaskar, A., Amiri, A., & Mirjalili, S. (2024). Polar fox optimization algorithm: a novel meta-heuristic algorithm. Neural Computing and Applications, 36(33), 20983-21022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-024-10346-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Jia, H., Zhou, X., Zhang, J., & Mirjalili, S. (2025). Superb Fairy-wren Optimization Algorithm: a novel metaheuristic algorithm for solving feature selection problems. ClusterComputing, 28(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-024-04901-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Joseph, S. B., Dada, E. G., Abidemi, A., Oyewola, D. O., & Khammas, B. M. (2022). Metaheuristic algorithms for PID controller parameters tuning: Review, approaches and open problems. Heliyon, 8(5), e09399. doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon... [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kahraman, H. T., Bakir, H., Duman, S., Katı, M., Aras, S., & Guvenc, U. (2022). Dynamic FDB selection method and its application: modeling and optimizing of directional overcurrent relays coordination: HT Kahraman et al. Applied Intelligence, 52(5), 4873-4908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-021-02629-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kaitera, S., & Harmoinen, S. (2022). Developing Mathematical Problem-Solving Skills in Primary School by Using Visual Representations on Heuristics. LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 10(2), 111-146. https://doi.org/10.31129/lumat.10.2.1696 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Nabi, S., Ahmad, M., Ibrahim, M., & Hamam, H. (2022). AdPSO: adaptive PSO-based task scheduling approach for cloud computing. Sensors, 22(3), 920. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Rokbani, N., Kumar, R., Abraham, A., Alimi, A. M., Long, H. V., Priyadarshini, I., & Son, L. H. (2021). Bi-heuristic ant colony optimization-based approaches for traveling salesman problem. Soft Computing, 25(5), 3775-3794. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Selvarajan, S. (2024). A comprehensive study on modern optimization techniques for engineering applications. Artificial Intelligence Review, 57(8), 194. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Singh, E., & Pillay, N. (2022). A study of ant-based pheromone spaces for generation constructive hyper-heuristics. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 72, 101095. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Tripathi, D. R., Vachhani, K. H., Bandhu, D., Kumari, S., Kumar, V. R., & Abhishek, K. (2021). Experimental investigation and optimization of abrasive waterjet machining parameters for GFRP composites using metaphor-less algorithms. Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 36(7), 803-813. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Wang, J., Khishe, M., Kaveh, M., & Mohammadi, H. (2021). Binary chimp optimization algorithm (BChOA): a new binary meta-heuristic for solving optimization problems. Cognitive Computation, 13(5), 1297-1316. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Xiao, Y., Cui, H., Khurma, R. A., & Castillo, P. A. (2025). Artificial lemming algorithm: a novel bionic meta-heuristic technique for solving real-world engineering optimization problems. Artificial Intelligence Review, 58:84 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Yildiz, A. R., Abderazek, H., & Mirjalili, S. (2020). A Comparative Study of Recent Non-traditional Methods for Mechanical Design Optimization: AR Yildiz et al. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 27(4), 1031-1048. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study