ICT Integration in Teaching Delivery: A Qualitative Study of Non-Techie Teachers in the Era of Artificial Intelligence

Authors

Daryl John V. Ebale

Master of Arts in Educational Administration, Central Mindanao University Musuan, Bukidnon, Philippines (Philippines)

James L. Paglinawan, PhD

Associate Professor IV, Central Mindanao University Musuan, Bukidnon, Philippines (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.11060307

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 11/6 | Page No: 4089-4099

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-02

Accepted: 2026-07-07

Published: 2026-07-20

Abstract

The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence has created opportunities and challenges for teachers, particularly non-techie teachers. This study explored the experiences of non-techie teachers in integrating AI into their teaching practice. Specifically, it examined their perceptions of recent AI advancements, the challenges they encountered, the strategies and support systems they used to adapt, and their recommendations for helping other teachers bridge the technology gap. The study employed a qualitative descriptive research design involving purposively selected public elementary school teachers from two rural schools in Sumilao, Bukidnon. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using a researcher-made interview guide and analyzed through thematic analysis. The findings revealed four major themes: AI as a practical lesson-preparation aid characterized by cautious reliance, limited prompt literacy as a barrier to effective AI use, peer support and self-directed learning amid resource constraints, and embracing gradual learning while using AI as a supportive rather than substitutive tool. Participants viewed AI as a valuable resource for lesson preparation, instructional support, and workload reduction while emphasizing the importance of verifying AI-generated outputs and exercising professional judgment. They relied on self-directed learning and peer collaboration to overcome limited institutional support and regarded AI competency as a gradual learning process. The findings suggest that successful AI integration extends beyond access to technology and requires stronger AI literacy, prompt literacy, and sustained professional development. These results may inform teacher training programs, AI literacy initiatives, and educational policies that promote responsible, ethical, and human-centered AI integration in Philippine basic education.

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence (AI), non-techie teachers, AI literacy, prompt literacy, qualitative research

Downloads

References

1. Alvero, J. C. M. (2025). TPACK-based assessment of faculty integration of artificial intelligence in general education courses toward advancing SDG 4: Basis for a faculty capacity development program. Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 5(10), 472-485. https://doi.org/10.47760/cognizance.2025.v05i10.043 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Balbada, E. (2025). Exploring Filipino language educators’ perceptions and pedagogical adaptations in AI-integrated instruction. International Journal on Culture, History, and Religion, 7(SI3), 261-274. https://doi.org/10.63931/ijchr.v7iSI3.327 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Blando, H. D. (2025). Bridging the digital divide: A systematic review of teacher preparedness and technology integration in the MATATAG Curriculum. Ignatian International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 3(3), 1154–1176. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15113816 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Calamlam, J. M. M. (2026). Artificial intelligence functions in mathematics lesson planning: Perceived usefulness and limitations among Filipino preservice teachers. Asian Journal for Mathematics Education, 5(2), 229–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/27527263261454602 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cubillas, T. E., Dela Cruz, N. V. D., Galvadores, G. Q. F., Olivares, J. M. B., & Cubillas, A. U. (2026). Artificial intelligence literacy and adoption among basic education teachers. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 15(3), 1986–2000. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v15i3.36999 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Department of Education. (2026). Foundational guidelines on artificial intelligence in basic education (Enclosure to DepEd Order No. 003, s. 2026). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. EK, E. (2026). Higher education teachers’ agency in the integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) tools in teaching [Master’s thesis, Halmstad University]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Federiakin, D., Molerov, D., Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., & Maur, A. (2024). Prompt engineering as a new 21st century skill. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1366434. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1366434 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Jesus, J. B., & Caumeran, R. R. (2026). Human-centered AI in education: Educators’ perspectives on teacher roles, ethics, and pedagogical value. International Journal on Studies in Education (IJonSE), 8(1), 142-154. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.5748 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Landge, R., Mulay, M., Siju, S. M., & Gaikwad, K. (2025). Developing AI literacy in education: A framework for teacher professional development. GAP Bodhi Taru, 8(1), 53–61. https://www.gapbodhitaru.org/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Mohan, P., & Sarraf, S. R. (2026). Teachers' preparedness for GenAI integration in education: A pilot study. International Journal of Social Science Research (IJSSR), 3(2), 473–482. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Obmerga, M. E. (2026). The impact of sustainability education mindset and project management skills on Filipino Gen Z pre-service science educators’ innovative pedagogical disposition. GILE Journal of Skills Development, 6(1), 49–71. https://doi.org/10.52398/gjsd.2026.v6.i1.pp49-71 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ortiz, O. E., Jr., Viaña, A. A., Ali, A. T., & Dela Cruz, J. M. M. (2025). Artificial intelligence in the traditional teaching and learning landscape: Cases from selected secondary schools in the Philippines. Technologique: A Global Journal on Technological Developments and Scientific Innovations, 4(1), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.62718/vmca.tech-gjtdsi.3.1.SC-0225-005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Pangowen, C. (2026). Filipino teachers' experiences with artificial intelligence in basic education: A phenomenological study. Journal of Education and Innovation, 28(2), 292569. https://doi.org/10.71185/jeiejournals.v28i2.292569 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Paran, L. R. L., De Leon, J. L., & Pade, E. Q. (2024). Challenges in technology integration for elementary teachers. Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 4(12), 90-99. https://doi.org/10.47760/cognizance.2024.v04i12.009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Picardal Jr., E. B. (2026). Ethical challenges of generative AI and academic integrity in Philippine higher education. UKR Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences (UKRJAHSS), 1(10). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Qumainah, I., Rahmadini, Y., & Maulidiyah, N. (2026). AI-assisted lesson planning in English language teaching: Teachers’ perceptions, practices, and ethical concerns. Pedagogy: Journal of English Language Teaching, 14(1), 46–69. https://doi.org/10.32332/joelt.v14i1.13364 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Rempillo, R. D., & Despi, D. E. (2026). Impact of artificial intelligence (AI) tools on teaching-related tasks of teachers at Sorsogon National High School. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 11(3), 2298-2311. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26mar1187 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Ruiz, C. C., & Yambao, F. M. P. (2026). AI literacy and professional development engagement as predictors of mathematics teachers’ readiness for AI-enhanced instruction. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 25(2), 655–675. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.25.2.29 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Ruiz, C. C., & Yambao, F. M. P. (2026). AI literacy and professional development engagement as predictors of mathematics teachers' readiness for AI-enhanced instruction. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 25(2), 655–675. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.25.2.29 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Sabado, A. G., Patungao, L. B., Aplasen, F. A. L., Pecua, J. C. B., Calimag, J. A. A., Eugenio, K. J. S., & Magsino, G. A. M. (2026). Teachers’ readiness for DepEd AI integration in Philippine basic education: A descriptive–correlational study. The International Review of Multidisciplinary Research, 1(3), 563-574. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19336127 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Sereno III, S. B., Barredo, K. I. A., Lim, T. A., Lamano, Jr, N. R., Javellana, J. B. P., & Balocon, O. H. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence on academic performance and learning behaviors of college students. Ignatian International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 3(10), 885–904. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17492388 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Shenoy, P., & Saarela, M. (2026). AI literacy frameworks for educators: An umbrella review. Proceedings of the 59th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 44–53. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/111399 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Sibug, V. B., Vital, V. P., Miranda, J. P. P., Fernando, E. Q., Gamboa, A. B., Hernandez, H. E., Bansil, J. A., Penecilla, E. M., & Gonzales, D. D. (2024). Teachers’ perspectives on integrating AI tools in classrooms: Insights from the Philippines. Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Computers in Education. Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. UNESCO. (2024). AI competency framework for teachers. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Unsong, N. E., & Morbo, E. A. (2025). Fears and challenges faced by Generation X MAPEH teachers in integrating ICT for 21st century education. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRISS), 9(5). https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.90500047 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Zosa, J. A., & Chavez, J. C. (2025). Exploring the relationship between algorithmic knowledge and prompt framing to critical thinking among teacher education students in Cagayan de Oro City. Ignatian International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 3(12), 733–764. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17983394 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles