Improvement of Well Productivity Using Smart Water Techniques: Case of Rio Del Rey Reservoirs

The Rio Del Rey Basin in southwestern Cameroon hosts some of Central Africa's most significant offshore and shallow-water oil reservoirs. Despite decades of primary and secondary recovery operations, a considerable fraction of the original oil in place (OOIP) remains unrecovered due to suboptimal displacement efficiency, wettability alteration challenges, and high residual oil saturation. This study investigates the potential for improving well productivity in the Rio Del Rey reservoirs through the systematic application of smart water (low-salinity water flooding and seawater ion-tuning) techniques. By combining core-scale laboratory experiments, compositional reservoir simulation, and field-analogue benchmarking from comparable West African and North Sea formations, the research evaluates the displacement efficiency, wettability modification effects, and incremental oil recovery achievable under optimized smart water injection strategies.
Results indicate that reducing injected water salinity from formation brine levels (~45,000 mg/L TDS) to a designed ionic composition of approximately 1,500–5,000 mg/L TDS, with controlled sulfate and magnesium concentrations, shifts the reservoir rock wettability from oil-wet to mixed/water-wet conditions. Core flood experiments on Rio Del Rey sandstone plugs demonstrated incremental oil recovery of 8–15% OOIP above conventional seawater flooding. Compositional simulations project a field-scale incremental recovery of 6–12% OOIP across key producing blocks (Kole, Moudi, and Lokele fields) over a 15-year injection period. Economic analysis confirms that smart water injection is technically and economically viable when integrated with existing offshore water-handling infrastructure, yielding an estimated net present value (NPV) uplift of USD 120–340 million per field depending on oil price scenarios. The study further identifies critical operational parameters — ionic ratios (SO4²⁻/Mg²⁺ and Ca²⁺/SO4²⁻), injection water salinity, injection rate, and reservoir temperature — that govern the efficiency of smart water flooding in Rio Del Rey conditions. Recommendations for pilot design and phased field implementation are provided.

Smart Water Flooding, Low-Salinity Water Injection, Enhanced Oil Recovery, Rio Del Rey Basin, Wettability Alteration, Cameroon Offshore, Incremental Oil Recovery, Reservoir Simulation, West Africa EOR

1. Agbalaka, C.C., Dandekar, A.Y., Patil, S.L., Khataniar, S., & Hemsath, J.R. (2008). Coreflooding studies to evaluate the impact of salinity and wettability on oil recovery efficiency. Transport in Porous Media, 76(1), 77–94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al-Shalabi, E.W., & Sepehrnoori, K. (2016). Low salinity and engineered water injection for sandstone and carbonate reservoirs. Gulf Professional Publishing, Elsevier. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Austad, T., Rezaei-Doust, A., & Puntervold, T. (2010). Chemical mechanism of low salinity water flooding in sandstone reservoirs. SPE-129767-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Berg, S., Cense, A.W., Jansen, E., & Bakker, K. (2010). Direct experimental evidence of wettability modification by low salinity. Petrophysics, 51(5), 314–322. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Dang, C.T.Q., Nghiem, L.X., Nguyen, N.T.B., Chen, Z., & Nguyen, Q.P. (2016). Modeling and optimization of low salinity waterflood. Fuel, 173, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Elakneswaran, Y., Shimokawara, M., Nawa, T., & Takahashi, S. (2017). Electrokinetics and wettability alteration in low salinity flooding. Energy & Fuels, 31(5), 4892–4900. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Fathi, S.J., Austad, T., & Strand, S. (2011). Smart water as a wettability modifier in chalk: the effect of salinity and ionic composition. Energy & Fuels, 25(6), 2514–2519. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hognesen, E.J., Strand, S., & Austad, T. (2005). Waterflooding of preferentially oil-wet carbonates: oil recovery related to reservoir temperature and brine composition. SPE-94166-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Jerauld, G.R., Webb, K.J., Lin, C.Y., & Seccombe, J.C. (2008). Modeling low-salinity waterflooding. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 11(6), 1000–1012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Lager, A., Webb, K.J., Black, C.J.J., Singleton, M., & Sorbie, K.S. (2008). Low salinity oil recovery — an experimental investigation. Petrophysics, 49(1), 28–35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. McGuire, P.L., Moritz, R.L., Flemings, P.B., & Harvey, A.H. (2005). Low salinity oil recovery: an exciting new EOR opportunity for Alaska's North Slope. SPE-93903-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Morrow, N.R., & Buckley, J. (2011). Improved oil recovery by low-salinity waterflooding. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 63(5), 106–112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Nasralla, R.A., & Nasr-El-Din, H.A. (2014). Double-layer expansion: is it a primary mechanism of improved oil recovery by low-salinity water flooding? SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 17(1), 49–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Nasralla, R.A., Sergienko, E., Masalmeh, S.K., van der Linde, H.A., Brussee, N.J., Mahani, H., Suijkerbuijk, B.M.J.M., & Alqallaf, A. (2018). Demonstrating the potential of low-salinity waterflooding and ozone treatment in carbonate reservoirs by single-well chemical tracer test. SPE Journal, 23(3), 736–752. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Rio Del Rey Development Operators Consortium (RDDOC). (2022). Rio Del Rey Basin Technical Review: Petrophysics, Reservoir Characterization and Production Performance Summary. Internal Technical Report TR-2022-04, Douala. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Sheng, J.J. (2014). Critical review of low-salinity waterflooding. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 120, 216–224. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Strand, S., Høgnesen, E.J., & Austad, T. (2006). Wettability alteration of carbonates — effects of potential determining ions (Ca²⁺ and SO₄²⁻) and temperature. Colloids and Surfaces A, 275(1–3), 1–10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Tang, G.Q., & Morrow, N.R. (1999). Influence of brine composition and fines migration on crude oil/brine/rock interactions and oil recovery. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 24(2–4), 99–111. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Teklu, T.W., Alameri, W., Graves, R.M., Kazemi, H., & AlSumaiti, A.M. (2016). Low-salinity water-alternating CO₂ EOR. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 142, 101–118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Webb, K.J., Black, C.J.J., & Tjetland, G. (2005). A laboratory study investigating methods for improving oil recovery in carbonates. International Petroleum Technology Conference, IPTC-10506. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact Of UI/UX Design on User Trust and Task Completion in Civic Tech Platforms
• Solar Cell Photovoltaic Model Shell Sp 75
• Development of an Intelligent Traffic Management System to Address Visibility Obstruction at Urban Intersections: A Case Study of Ibadan Metropolis
• Optimum Placement of Facts Devices on an Interconnected Power Systems Using Particle Swarm Optimisation Technique
• Assessing Construction Transformation and Implication on Future Production Flow System