Improving Grade 8 Students’ Grammatical Competence in Filipino through Task-Based Language Learning Strategy

Authors

Myrren C. Alo

Professional Education Department, College of Education, Central Mindanao University (Philippines)

Jodelyn Y. Al-os

Professional Education Department, College of Education, Central Mindanao University (Philippines)

Arianne Keth A. Amor

Professional Education Department, College of Education, Central Mindanao University (Philippines)

Grace Syrah L. Andallo

Professional Education Department, College of Education, Central Mindanao University (Philippines)

Christine May C. Andamon

Professional Education Department, College of Education, Central Mindanao University (Philippines)

Salbino M. Anticristo Jr.

Professional Education Department, College of Education, Central Mindanao University (Philippines)

Rubillinda A. Paglinawan, PhD

Professional Education Department, College of Education, Central Mindanao University (Philippines)

James L. Paglinawan, PhD

Professional Education Department, College of Education, Central Mindanao University (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.11060139

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 11/6 | Page No: 1831-1836

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-06-07

Accepted: 2026-06-12

Published: 2026-07-02

Abstract

This study investigated the effectiveness of Task-Based Language Learning (TBLL) in improving students’ grammatical skills in Filipino at Valencia National High School in Valencia City, Bukidnon, Philippines. The goal was to find out the level of grammatical competence among students taught with TBLL compared to those taught with traditional methods and to check for any significant differences between the two groups. A quasi-experimental research design was used, with both a pre-test and a post-test for a non-equivalent control group. Two intact sections participated in the study, with a total of sixty (60) students split evenly between the two groups. Respondents were selected through random sampling to ensure fairness. Results showed that students in the TBLL group improved from a moderate level in the pre-test (M = 10.67) to a high level in the post-test (M = 17.67), while the non-TBLL group increased from a low level (M = 9.40) to a moderate level (M = 11.43). Furthermore, an independent samples t-test showed a significant difference between the post-test scores of both groups, t (58) = -10.54, p < 0.001, indicating that TBLL was more effective than traditional instruction. The findings suggest that task-based strategies improve students’ abilities to use grammatical structures in meaningful contexts. This study emphasizes the need to integrate learner-centered approaches in grammar instruction to enhance language learning success.

Keywords

quasi-experimental design, communicative tasks, grammar acquisition, learner-centered instruction, language proficiency

Downloads

References

1. Alieto, E. O. (2018). Language attitudes of Filipino multilinguals toward English. Asian EFL Journal, 20(2), 1–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Allison, J. (2020). Word class development and grammatical accuracy in second language learning. Language Teaching Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bala, J. M., & Anudin, A. G. (2022). Language proficiency and academic performance of Filipino learners in secondary education. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(6), 1200–1208. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1306.12 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bernardo, A. S., & Madrunio, M. R. (2015). A framework for designing a Philippine English-based pedagogic model for teaching grammar. Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 3, 42–71. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bygate, M. (2015). Domains and directions in task-based language teaching. System, 49, 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.01.010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/1.1.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cruz, J. C. (2013). Grammar instruction and communicative competence of Filipino learners. Philippine ESL Journal, 11, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ellis, R. (2016). Focus on form: A critical review. Language Teaching Research, 20(3), 405–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816628627 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Li, X. (2012). Effects of communicative grammar instruction on second language development. System, 40(1), 21–30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. McManus, K. (2012). Learner errors in grammatical modifiers: A developmental perspective. Applied Linguistics Review, 3(2), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Rogers, A. (2016). Grammar instruction and learner difficulties in second language acquisition. ELT Journal, 70(3), 1–10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Saluta, M., et al. (2024). Grammar instruction and Grade 8 learners’ grammatical performance in Filipino. Journal of Instructional Practices. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Subillaga, R. (2025). Instructional approaches in teaching Philippine language grammar. Philippine Journal of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Torres, J. M., & Alieto, E. O. (2019). Grammatical acceptability among Filipino learners. Asian EFL Journal, 21(2), 100–115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Willis, J., & Willis, D. (2007). Doing task-based teaching. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles