Male Chauvinism and the Interpretation of Gender in the Bible: A Theological and Hermeneutical Appraisal

Male chauvinism remains a significant challenge in contemporary society and Christian communities, particularly where assumptions of male superiority are reinforced through cultural traditions, institutional practices, and interpretations of biblical texts concerning gender, authority, and submission. Although the Bible contains passages that have historically been interpreted as supporting male authority, it also contains substantial evidence of women's dignity, leadership, prophetic ministry, theological instruction, and participation in God's mission. This study distinguishes male chauvinism from the related concepts of patriarchy, sexism, and misogyny and investigates how these categories intersect within biblical interpretation. The study employs a qualitative theological methodology combining textual analysis, historical-contextual interpretation, theological analysis, and contextual hermeneutics. Particular attention is given to competing complementarian and egalitarian interpretations and to the influence of African cultural contexts upon the interpretation of gender-related biblical texts. The study argues that biblical interpretation becomes problematic when cultural assumptions of male superiority are imposed upon Scripture or when individual passages are isolated from their literary, historical, and canonical contexts. Genesis presents male and female together as bearers of the divine image and participants in humanity's vocation. Ephesians 5 places marital relations within the broader framework of mutual submission and Christlike self-giving, while 1 Corinthians 11:3 requires careful consideration of its literary context and the meaning of kephalē. The study concludes that responsible Christian hermeneutics should distinguish biblical teaching from culturally inherited patriarchy and should promote an understanding of authority characterized by service, mutuality, dignity, and participation in God's mission.

Male chauvinism, patriarchy, sexism, misogyny, gender, biblical interpretation, hermeneutics, women, authority, submission

1. Ademiluka, S. O. (2021). “‘For the husband is the head of the wife’: A contextual re-reading of Ephesians 5:22–33 among Nigerian Yoruba Christians.” In die Skriflig, 55(1), a2613. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. https://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v55i1.2613 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ademiluka, S. O. (2021b). “Patriarchy and marital disharmony amongst Nigerian Christians: Ephesians 5:22–33 as a response.” HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 77(4), a5991. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v77i4.5991 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Baloyi, G. T. (2022). “Mercy Oduyoye's model of ‘partnership between women and men’ in African Christian ministry.” HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 78(2), a7598. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v78i2.7598 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bond, H. (2024). Junia, “Priscilla and Phoebe: The Roman Church's female leadership.” In J. Rueggemeier (Ed.), Early Christian centres: Rome. Mohr Siebeck. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Callon, C. (2024). Authority over whose head? Did Paul instruct wives or all women to cover their heads (1 Corinthians 11:2–16)? Harvard Theological Review. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017816024000351 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. De la Cruz, M., Morales, J., & colleagues. (2025). “Male chauvinism and complex thinking: A study of male chauvinism and gender-related attitudes.” Societies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Diko, M. (2024). “Uncovering hidden oppressions: Probing the use of patriarchal language in Genesis 3:16, Ephesians 5:22–24, and 1 Timothy 2:11–12 through poststructuralist feminism.” Journal for Semitics, 33(1). (Journals.co.za) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mati, A. (2022). “The ontology of men and women's relationships in contemporary African ecclesiology: Towards a theology of authority-submission in the church.” HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 78(1), a7920. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v78i1.7920 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Mojola, A. O. (2022). African biblical hermeneutics in a state of flux: Towards refocusing its trajectory. Verbum et Ecclesia, 43(1), a2507. https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v43i1.2507 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Mokoena, L. L. (2022). “The practices of radical refusal in biblical feminist interpretation and black study.” Verbum et Ecclesia, 43(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v43i1.2398 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Nelson, J. E. (2024). Judge Deborah and Pastor/Teacher Priscilla: Templates for contemporary biblical women's leadership. Religions, 15(4), 397. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15040397 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Nwoko, M. N., & Igbokwe, C. C. (2023). “Biblical gender equality and women's participation in leadership.” IJORESH: Indonesian Journal of Religion, Spirituality and Humanity, 2(2), 210–232. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijoresh.v2i2.210-232 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Olojede, F. O. (2021). “African women in the Hebrew Bible: A socioeconomic and African hermeneutical reading.” Old Testament Essays, 34(2), 610–627. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. https://doi.org/10.17159/2312-3621/2021/v34n2a17 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Savigny, H. (2020). “Sexism and misogyny.” In The International Encyclopedia of Gender, Media, and Communication. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119429128.iegmc092 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Sybrandi, M. (2024). “Women leaders lost in translation? A study in Romans 16:1–16.” Expository Times, 136(3), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/00145246241287148 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Uwaegbute, K. (2023). “A social-scientific re-reading of Ephesians 5:21–33 and the problem of patriarchy among the Igbo people of Nigeria.” Horizons in Biblical Theology, 45(1), 108–133. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. https://doi.org/10.1163/18712207-12341464 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Wafawanaka, R. (2021). “Toxic masculinity in Africa and the Bible: The strong-man model and the co-optation of feminist biblical interpretation.” Old Testament Essays, 34(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. https://doi.org/10.17159/2310-0508/2021/v34n3a9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Exploring Gender Narratives: Femininity and Masculinity in Health and Commercial Advertising in the Philippines
• Gendered Dimensions of Marital Celebrations: A Comparative Analysis of Women's and Men's Experiences and Perceptions
• Assessing the Impact of Gender Mainstreaming Policies and Programs on Gender Equality in Caraga Region, Philippines: A Quantitative Survey-Based Analysis
• Gendered Coping Patterns: Advancing Healthy Help-Seeking Behaviours in Men
• From Panoptic Control to Quiet Resistance: Navigating Gendered Childhoods and Emerging Agency in Rajshahi, Bangladesh