Modeling Customers’ Complaint Using Overdispersed Timeseries Count Data Models: Evidence from Nigerian Public Complaint Commission

Authors

Emmanuel Joseph

Department of Statistics, Faculty of Physical Science, University of Abuja, Abuja (Nigeria)

Samuel Olorunfemi Adams

Department of Statistics, Faculty of Physical Science, University of Abuja, Abuja (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.11070067

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 11/7 | Page No: 1029-1048

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-03

Accepted: 2026-07-08

Published: 2026-07-31

Abstract

This study compares overdispersed count time series models for analysing and forecasting monthly customer complaints received by the Nigerian Public Complaints Commission (NPCC). Complaint data are inherently discrete, non-negative, and typically exhibit overdispersion and strong temporal dependence, making classical Gaussian-based time series models inappropriate. To address these challenges, three competing models were considered: the first-order Integer-Valued Autoregressive model with Poisson innovations [INAR(1)-P], the INAR(1) model with Negative Binomial innovations [INAR(1)-NB], and the Autoregressive Conditional Poisson (ACP) model. The models were fitted to NPCC monthly complaint data, and their performance was evaluated using log-likelihood, Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). Preliminary diagnostic tests confirmed the presence of significant autocorrelation and overdispersion in the data, justifying the use of specialized count time series models. Empirical results revealed that all models captured strong persistence in complaint dynamics, with autoregressive coefficients close to unity, indicating high temporal dependence. Comparative model assessment showed that the ACP(1,1) model outperformed both INAR(1) specifications, yielding the highest log-likelihood and the lowest AIC and BIC values. This suggests that incorporating both past observed counts and past conditional means provides a superior representation of the underlying complaint-generating process. Based on the preferred ACP(1,1) model, forecasts for 2026 indicate a steady upward trend in complaint volumes, with projected monthly complaints increasing from approximately 53,799 in January to 64,640 in December. The findings demonstrate that ACP models provide a more robust framework for modelling overdispersed and highly persistent complaint count data compared to traditional INAR formulations. The study contributes to the growing literature on integer-valued time series modelling and offers practical insights for forecasting and resource planning within public-sector complaint management systems.

Keywords

ACP (1,1) Model; Binomial Thinning Operator; Count Data; Innovation Process

Downloads

References

1. Adams, S.O., Obaromi, A.D., Rauf, I.R. (2021). Modelling the Number of Household Visit to Health Care Centres in Some Nigeria Communities Using Count Data Regression Models, Journal of Biostatistics and Epidemiology. 7(1), 36-47. https://doi.org/10.18502/jbe.v7i1.6293 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adams, S.O., Bamanga, M.A., Olanrewaju, S.O., Yahaya, H.U., Akano, R.O. (2020). Modelling COVID-19 Cases in Nigeria Using Some Selected Count Regression Models, International Journal of Healthcare and Medical Sciences, 6(4),64-73. https://doi.org/10.32861/ijhms.64.57.63 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Akano, R.O., Adams, S.O. (2019). Nigeria Government’s Expenditure on Economic and Social Service Development: A Canonical Correlation Analysis Approach, Archives of Current Research International, 18(04), 1 – 12. https://doi.org/10.9734/acri/2019/v18i430142 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Al-Osh, M. A., & Alzaid, A. A. (1988). First-order integer-valued autoregressive (INAR(1)) process. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 9(3), 261–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9892.1988.tb00468.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Aly, E.-E. A., & Bouzar, N. (2021). Stationary underdispersed INAR(1) models based on the backward approach. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.10471 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Barreto-Souza, W., Ndreca, S., Silva, R. B., & Silva, R. W. C. (2023). Non-linear INAR(1) processes under an alternative geometric thinning operator, TEST, 32(3), 695–725. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Beran, J., & Droullier, F. (2024). On strongly dependent zero-inflated INAR(1) processes, Statistical Papers, 65, 2527–2553. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Böckenholt, U. (1999). Mixed INAR(1) Poisson regression models. Journal of Applied Statistics, 26(4), 427–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664769922345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Böckenholt, U. (2025). An INAR(1) negative multinomial regression model for longitudinal count Data, Psychometrika. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-025-xxxxx-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity, Journal of Econometrics, 31(3), 307-327. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Bourguignon, M., Rodrigues, J., & Santos-Neto, M. (2018). Extended Poisson INAR(1) processes with equidispersion, underdispersion and overdispersion. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.10940 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Bracher, J., & Sobolová, B. (2022). A class of count time series models uniting compound Poisson INAR and INGARCH models. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Davis, R. A., Dunsmuir, W. T. M., & Wang, Y. (2020). Modeling time series of count data, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 115(531), 1557–1570. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2020.1737602 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Engle, R. and Russell, J.R. (1998). Autoregressive Conditional Duration: A New Model for Irregularly Spaced Transaction Data, Econometrica, 66(5), 11-27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Fokianos, K. (2012). Count time series models. In T. Subba Rao, S. Subba Rao, & C. R. Rao (Eds.), Handbook of Statistics: Time Series Analysis (Vol. 30, pp. 315–347). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53858-1.00011-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Fokianos, K., & Tjøstheim, D. (2011). Log-linear Poisson autoregression. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 102(3), 563–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmva.2010.10.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Halliday, J., & Boshnakov, G. N. (2018). PoARX modeling for multivariate count time series, Journal of Time Series Analysis, 39(6), 1055–1078. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsa.12345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Heinen, A. (2003). Modelling time series count data: An autoregressive conditional Poisson model. Journal of Econometrics, 112(2), 353–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(02)00223-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Irshad, M. R., Ahammed, M., Maya, R., & Chesneau, C. (2024). INAR(1) process with Poisson-transmuted record type exponential innovations. Model Assisted Statistics and Applications, 19(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.3233/MAS-231458 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Jia, Y., Kechagias, S., Livsey, J., Lund, R., & Pipiras, V. (2018). Latent Gaussian count time series. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 39(6), 1055–1078. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Jørgensen, B., & Song, X. (2019). Observation-driven models for count data, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 46(2), 455–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjos.12345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Jung, R. C., & Tremayne, A. R. (2006). Coherent forecasting in integer-valued time series models. International Journal of Forecasting, 22(4), 793–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2006.03.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Kabore, T. M., & Ouedraogo, O. J. E. (2025). Forecasting overdispersed count time series with the DLD-INAR(1) model, Annals of Mathematics and Computer Science, 30, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Kang, Y., Sheng, D., & Lu, F. (2025). A simple INAR(1) model for analyzing count time series with multiple features, Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods, 54(2), 457–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2024.2314613 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Kang, Y., Wang, D., & Yang, K. (2020). A new thinning-based INAR(1) process for overdispersed Counts, Journal of the Korean Statistical Society, 49(2), 324–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42952-020-00012-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Khan, N. M., & Sunecher, Y. (2025). A flexible bivariate integer-valued autoregressive of order (1) model for over- and under-dispersed time series applications. Stats. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Lee, Y., Kim, S., & Park, J. (2021). Generalized Poisson autoregressive models, Statistical Modelling, 21(4), 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471082X20912345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Liboschik, T., Fokianos, K., & Fried, R. (2017). tscount: An R package for analysis of count time series following generalized linear models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(5), 1–51. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i05 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Liu, A., Silva, M., & Rodrigues, J. (2023). Multivariate mixed Poisson generalized inverse Gaussian INAR(1) regression, Computational Statistics, 38(2), 955–977. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Liu, M., Zhu, F., Li, J., & Sun, C. (2023). A Systematic Review of INGARCH Models for Integer-Valued Time Series. Entropy, 25(6), 922. https://doi.org/10.3390/e25060922 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Liu, M., Zhu, F., & Zhu, K. (2020). Modelling heavy-tailedness in count time series. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 82, 766–784. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Liu, X., Chen, Y., & Wang, Z. (2024). Dynamic Poisson autoregressive models in healthcare Forecasting, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 180, 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2024.107120 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Liu, X., Chen, Y., & Wang, Z. (2026). Recent advancements in integer-valued autoregressive models for count data time series: A comprehensive review. MethodsX, 13, 103805. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Mahmoudi, E., Rostami, A., & Roozegar, R. (2018). A new integer-valued AR(1) process based on power series thinning operator. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.00994 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. McKenzie, E. (2003). Discrete variate time series. In D. N. Shanbhag & C. R. Rao (Eds.), Handbook of Statistics (Vol. 21, pp. 573–606). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7161(03)21017-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Musa, S.I. and Nweze, N.O. (2021). Model Selection for Time Series Count Data with Over-Dispersion, Asian Journal of Probability and Statistics, 14(2), 60-73. https://doi.org/10.9734/AJPAS/2021/v14i230326 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Nguyen, T., Tran, H., & Pham, L. (2025). Real-time forecasting with observation-driven Poisson Models, Annals of Applied Statistics, 19(1), 88–110. https://doi.org/10.1214/24-AOAS1234 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Olakorede, N. M., & Olanrewaju, S. O. (2025). INAR(1) model with negative binomial innovation for forecasting count data, International Journal of Statistics and Probability, 12(6), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijsp.v12n6p23 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Qi, X., Li, Q., & Zhu, F. (2019). Modeling time series of count with excess zeros and ones based on INAR(1), Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 346, 572–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2018.07.043 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Sueutel, F. W. and Van Harn, K. (1979). Discrete analogues of self-decomposability and stability, Annals of Probability, 7(5), 893-899. https://doi.org/10.1214/aop/1176994950 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Serrao, V., Poojari, S., & Kamath, A. (2026). Recent advancements in integer-valued autoregressive models for count data time series: A comprehensive review. MethodsX. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Weiß, C. H. (2018). An introduction to discrete-valued time series, Statistical Modelling, 18(3–4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471082X18761124 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Weiß, C. H. (2008). Thinning operations for modeling time series of counts—A survey. Asia Advances in Statistical Analysis, 92, 319–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10182-008-0072-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Yousfi, A. (2025). Modeling over-dispersed count time series via the Poisson X-Exponential INAR(1) process: Theory, estimation, and applications, Panamerican Mathematical Journal, 35(4), 1–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Yu, K., & Tao, T. (2023). Observation-driven random parameter INAR(1) model, Entropy, 25(6), 859. https://doi.org/10.3390/e25060859 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Zhang, Y., Liu, M., & Chen, J. (2022). Comparative study of INAR and observation-driven Models, Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, 38(5), 612–630. https://doi.org/10.1002/asmb.2689 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Zhu, R., & Joe, H. (2009). Modelling count data time series with Poisson and negative binomial autoregressive models. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 30(6), 667–697. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9892.2009.00626.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles