Models of Teaching English in India a Critical Review of Pedagogical Approaches, Policy Frameworks, and Classroom Practice in the Indian English Language Teaching Context

Few subjects in Indian education carry as much historical baggage and present-day urgency as the teaching of English. It arrived as an instrument of colonial administration, was retained after 1947 as a language of law, higher education, and the civil services, and now doubles as a marker of social mobility for some and of exclusion for others. This paper traces how these competing pressures have produced, over roughly a century and a half, a layered rather than linear history of pedagogy: colonial grammar-translation gave way to mid-century structuralism, which was in turn challenged by the communicative movement of the 1970s–90s, and all three now sit uneasily alongside the multilingual, learner-centred orientation of the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020. Rather than treating these as a tidy sequence of methods each superseding the last, the paper argues that they persist simultaneously, layered on top of one another in actual classrooms, because none of the underlying constraints that produced them — linguistic plurality, uneven teacher preparation, examination-driven assessment, and rural-urban resourcing gaps — has gone away. The review examines nine major models (Grammar-Translation, the Direct Method, the Structural-Situational Approach, the Bilingual Method, Communicative Language Teaching, Task-Based and Content-Based Instruction, the Eclectic Approach, multilingual/mother-tongue-based pedagogy, and technology-mediated instruction) against the specific realities of Indian classrooms, and closes by arguing that the country's diversity makes a single official method neither available nor desirable. What is available, and what the evidence supports, is a form of principled eclecticism: deliberate, trained combination of techniques rather than either nostalgic grammar-translation or an unreflective import of communicative orthodoxy.

English Language Teaching (ELT), India, models of teaching, Communicative Language Teaching, Bilingual Method.

1. Alderson, J. C., & Wall, D. (1993). Does wash back exist? Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 115–129. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Annamalai, E. (2001). Managing multilingualism in India: Political and linguistic manifestations. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Dodson, C. J. (1967). Language teaching and the bilingual method. Pitman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Government of India, Ministry of Education. (2020). National Education Policy 2020. Ministry of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Krishnaswamy, N., & Burde, A. S. (1998). The politics of Indians' English: Linguistic colonialism and the expanding English empire. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Kumar, K. (2005). Political agenda of education: A study of colonialist and nationalist ideas (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. National Council of Educational Research and Training. (2006). Position paper of the National Focus Group on teaching of English. NCERT. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Sheorey, R. (2006). Learning and teaching English in India. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Vaish, V. (2008). Biliteracy and globalization: English language education in India. Multilingual Matters. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Evaluating the Impacts of Mind Mapping Strategy on Developing EFL Students’ Critical Reading Skills
• Significance of Reading Instructions for Language Improvement in Children with Down Syndrome
• Prenasalised Consonants in Liangmai
• Metadiscourse Matters: Definitions, Models, and Advantages for ESL/ EFL Writing
• Blank Minds and Stuck Voices: Understanding and Addressing Cognitive Anxiety in High-Stakes ESL Speaking Tests