Modified Orange Peels Biochar as a Sustainable Green Biosorbents for Nitrates and Phosphates in Environmental Waters

Biomass waste utilization has garnered a lot of interest lately, particularly in the purification of environmental water. Water pollution caused by excessive nitrates has become a significant environmental concern globally. The traditional treatment methods often involve costly and energy-intensive processes. This chapter examines the potential of using modified fruit peels, specifically modified orange peels biochars, as natural bio sorbents for the removal of nitrates and phosphates from environmental waters. Biochar, a charcoal-like material produced by heating biomass in an oxygen limited environment, has emerged as a promising tool for water purification due to its unique properties and environmental advantages. Its microporous structure offers a vast surface area decorated with functional groups, ideal for capturing contaminants such as the phosphates and the nitrates. Biochar's purification power works through a combination of mechanisms. It acts like a sponge, using its porous structure to trap contaminants physically through adsorption. The charged functional groups on its surface also act like magnets, attracting and holding onto unwanted ions through ion exchange. Scientists rely on mathematical models like Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms to fully understand how well biochar will work in a particular situation. These models describe how efficiently biochar removes contaminants at varying concentrations either through monolayer adsorption route on homogenous surfaces as in the case of Langmuir or onto heterogenous surfaces as in the case of Freundlich isotherm, providing valuable insights for optimizing biochar-based water treatment systems.

Green bio sorbents, Biochars, modified orange peel biochars

1. Al-Harahsheh, M., Batiha, M., Kraishan, S. and Al-Zoubi, H. (2014). Precipitation treatment of effluent acidic wastewater from phosphate-containing fertilizer industry: Characterization of solid and liquid products. Separation and Purification Technology, 123, 190–199. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Angelova, D., Uzunov, I., Uzunova, S., Gigova, A.and Minchev, L. (2011). Kinetics of oil and oil products adsorption by carbonized rice husks. Chemical Engineering Journal, 172, 306–311. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bao, S., Li, K., Ning, P., Peng, J., Jin, X. and Tang, L. (2017). Highly effective removal of mercury and lead ions from wastewater by mercaptoamine-functionalised silica-coated magnetic nano-adsorbents: Behaviours and mechanisms. Applied Surface Science, 393, 457–466. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bhatnagar, A. and Sillanpää, M. (2011). A review of emerging adsorbents for nitrate removal from water. Chemical Engineering Journal, 168, 493–504. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Boeykens, S. P., Piol, M. N., Legal, L. S., Saralegui, A. B. and Vázquez, C. (2017). Eutrophication decrease: Phosphate adsorption processes in presence of nitrates. Journal of Environmental Management, 203, 888–895. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Cairncross, S., Hunt, C., Boisson, S., Bostoen, K., Curtis, V., Fung, C. and Schmidt, W. (2010). Water, sanitation and hygiene for the prevention of diarrhoea. International Journal of Epidemiology, 39, 193–205. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chepyegon, C. and Kamiya, D. (2018). Challenges faced by the Kenya water sector management in improving water supply coverage. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 10, 85. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Chowdhury, S, and Balasubramanian, R. (2014). Recent advances in the use of graphene-family nanoadsorbents for removal of toxic pollutants from wastewater. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 204, 35–56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Colborn, T., Vom Saal, F. and Soto, A. M. (1993). Developmental effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in wildlife and humans. Environmental Health Perspectives, 101, 378–384. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Daneshvar, E., Zarrinmehr, M., Hashtjin, A., Farhadian, O. and Bhatnagar, A. (2018). Versatile applications of freshwater and marine water microalgae in dairy wastewater treatment, lipid extraction and tetracycline biosorption. Bioresource Technology, 268, 523–530. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Diaz-Uribe, C., Monterrosa, F., Simons, V., Duran, F., Florian, V., Vallejo, W., Castellanos, K., Diosa, J. E. and Mosquera-Vargas, E. (2025). Phosphorus Removal from Aqueous Solutions Using Biochar Derived from Cyanobacterial Biomass. Water, 17, 1-25 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Dong, T. and McCarthy, T. J. (2017). Superhydrophobic, low-hysteresis patterning chemistry for water-drop manipulation. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 9,41126–41130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. El Gheriany, A., El Saqa, A., Amer, A. and Hussein, M. (2020). Oil spill sorption capacity of raw and thermally modified orange peel waste. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 59, 925–932. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Girotto, D., Piadeh, F., Bkhtiari, V., Behzadian, K., Chen, S., Campos, C. and Zolgharni, M. (2024). A critical review of digital technology innovations for early warning of water-related disease outbreaks associated with climatic hazards. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 100, 104151-104175. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hardyanti, N., Susanto, H., Kusuma, F. A. and Budihardjo, M. A. (2023). A Bibliometric Review of Adsorption Treatment with an Adsorbent for Wastewater. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 32, 67-95 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Jagadeesh, N. and Sundaram, B. (2023). Adsorption of pollutants from wastewater by biochar: A review. Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances, 9, 100226-100241. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kumari, N. and Bhandari, M. (2022). Graphene-based materials for water treatment and purification. In Handbook of Research on Water Sciences and Society (pp. 375–399). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Lata, S. and Samadder, S. (2016). Removal of arsenic from water using nano adsorbents and challenges: A review. Journal of Environmental Management, 166, 387–406. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Liu, L., Feng, B., Rao, Y. Z., Tian, C., Gu, X. and Huang, T. (2023). Development of Efficient Biochar Produced from Orange Peel for Effective La (III) and Y (III) Adsorption. Adsorption Science & Technology, 23, 551-583. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Lo, C., Bezerra, M., Colley, G., Fleming, M., Homeida, M., Kabatereine, N., Kabole, M., King, H., Mafe, A. and Midzi, N. (2022). Review of 2022 WHO guidelines on the control and elimination of schistosomiasis. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 22, e327–e335. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Lundberg, A. (2025). Climate, migration, and access to water: A case study of Kenya. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Mafra, M., Igarashi-Mafra, L., Zuim, D., Vasques, E., & Ferreira, M. (2013). Adsorption of remazol brilliant blue on an orange peel adsorbent. Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 30, 657–665. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Mekonnen, M. M., & Hoekstra, A. Y. (2016). Four billion people facing severe water scarcity. Science Advances, 2, 150-173. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Muhammad, A., Yusof, N. A., Hajian, R. and Abdullah, J. (2016). Decoration of carbon nanotubes with gold nanoparticles by electroless deposition process using ethylenediamine as a cross linker. Journal of Materials Research, 31, 2897–2905. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Mulwa, F., Li, Z. and Fangninou, F. (2021). Water scarcity in Kenya: Current status, challenges and future solutions. Open Access Library Journal, 8, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Nalumenya, B., Rubinato, M., Catterson, J., Kennedy, M., Bakamwesiga, H., & Wabwire, D. (2024). Assessing the Potential Impacts of Contaminants on the Water Quality of Lake Victoria: Two Case Studies in Uganda. Sustainability, 16,34-63 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Ondigo, D. A., Kavoo, A. M. and Kebwaro, J. (2018). Water resources and management under increasing urban demography: A Kenyan perspective—A review. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 10, 919–938. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Otieno, W., Okoth, K. and Mbugua, G. (2024). Sea Shell-Based Biochar for Efficient Fluoride Remediation. In Carbon-Based Materials and Environmental Remediation: Graphene, Biochar, and More (pp. 315–338). IGI Global. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Pandey, P., Sharma, S., & Sambi, S. (2010). Kinetics and equilibrium study of chromium adsorption on zeoliteNaX. International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology, 7, 395–404. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Qiu, M., Liu, L., Ling, Q., Cai, Y., Yu, S., Wang, S., Fu, D., Hu, B. and Wang, X. (2022). Biochar for the removal of contaminants from soil and water: A review. Biochar, 4, 19-39 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Rangabhashiyam, S., Anu, N., Nandagopal, M. G. and Selvaraju, N. (2014). Relevance of isotherm models in biosorption of pollutants by agricultural byproducts. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2, 398–414. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Saranyadevi, S., Gangadhar, L., Sana, S. S. and Kadem, A. A. (2023). Synthesis, Characterization, and Application of Nanoparticles from Medicinal Plant-Based Carotenoids. In Secondary Metabolites from Medicinal Plants (pp. 151–176). CRC Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Sathya, K., Nagarajan, K., Carlin Geor Malar, G., Rajalakshmi, S. and Raja Lakshmi, P. (2022). A comprehensive review on comparison among effluent treatment methods and modern methods of treatment of industrial wastewater effluent from different sources. Applied Water Science, 12, 70-93. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Singh, K., Lataye, H. and Wasewar, L. (2017). Removal of fluoride from aqueous solution by using bael (Aegle marmelos) shell activated carbon: Kinetic, equilibrium and thermodynamic study. Journal of Fluorine Chemistry, 194, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Srinivasulu, D. (2023). Senna auriculata L. flower petal biomass: An alternative green biosorbent for the removal of fluoride from aqueous solutions. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 43, 72–81. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. UNICEF. (1999). States of the art report on the extent of fluoride in drinking water and the resulting endemicity in India. Report by Fluorosis and Rural Development Foundation for UNICEF, New Delhi.1,1234-1265 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Vujić, M., Vasiljević, S., Nikić, J., Kordić, B., Agbaba, J. and Tubić, A. (2023). Sorption behavior of organic pollutants on biodegradable and nondegradable microplastics: pH effects. Applied Sciences, 13, 12835-12855. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Wang, W., Gu, Y., Zhou, C. and Hu, C. (2022). Current challenges and perspectives for the catalytic pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass to high-value products. Catalysts, 12, 1524-1549. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Yu, Y., Ma, X., Chen, R., Li, G., Tao, H. and Shi, B. (2019). The occurrence and transformation behaviors of disinfection byproducts in drinking water distribution systems in rural areas of eastern China. Chemosphere, 228, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar