Morphological Identification and Molecular Characterization of Termites in Selected Areas in Keffi, Nasarawa State, Nigeria

Authors

F.M. Gurku

Department of Zoology, Nasarawa State University Keffi, Keffi, Nasarawa (Nigeria)

J.D.C. Tongjura

Department of Zoology, Nasarawa State University Keffi, Keffi, Nasarawa (Nigeria)

R.J. Ombugadu

Department of Zoology, Nasarawa State University Keffi, Keffi, Nasarawa (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.11100003

Subject Category: Zoology

Volume/Issue: 11/10 | Page No: 21-27

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-10-09

Accepted: 2026-10-14

Published: 2026-10-29

Abstract

Morphological analysis of termites is crucial for the identification of the species and is used as the method available when molecular identification is not accessible, especially in developing countries. Thus, the study aimed to determine the morphological identification and molecular characterization of termites in selected areas in Keffi, Nasarawa State. Ten (10) soldiers and ten (10) worker termites were randomly sampled for identification from each study locations. In this study, head color, size, and shape, number of antennae segments, mandible shape, pronotum shape, and gula shape were considered as morphological characters and compared with identification keys. Species richness, dominance, and evenness or equitability indices were determined using Shannon–Wiener diversity index and Margalef's index. A total of one hundred and twenty-one (121) termite was in this study. Three subfamilies were represented: Nasutitermitinae, which included Trinervitermesgeminatus (58). Macrotermitinae, consisting of Macrotermesbellicosus (43), and Macrotermessubhyalinus (11). Termitinae, composed of Microcerotermessp (9). Macrotermitinae and Macrotermessubhyalinus constituted 35.5% and 9.1% respectively. Microcerotermessp recorded the list percentage occurrence of 7.4%. The species diversity indices varied between locations. GRA exhibited the highest Shannon-Wiener diversity index (1.168), whereas Angwan Lambu recorded the lowest (0.6364). Similarly, Simpson's diversity index was highest in GRA (0.64) and lowest in Angwan Lambu (0.44). Regarding species richness, the Margalef index indicated the highest value in GRA (1.001), contrasting with the lowest value observed in El- Kabir (0.3338). Understanding the abundance of termite species is crucial for effective control measures, and studies on species diversity in areas with anthropogenic activities are crucial for monitoring biodiversity loss in the environment.

Keywords

Termite, Isoptera, DNA Extraction, Gel Electrophoresis, Keffi, Nigeria

Downloads

References

1. Methods. American Journal of Applied Sciences 4(2):187-200. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abe, T., Bignell, D.E., and Higashi, M. (2020).Termites: Evolution, Socially, Symbioses, Ecology. Kluwer Academic Publishers. 256pp. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ackerman IL, Constantino R, Gauch HG, Lehmann J, Riha SJ, Erick CMF (2019) Termite (Insecta: Isoptera) Species Composition in a Primary Rain Forest and Agroforests in Central Amazonia. The Association for Tropical Biology and Conservation Biotropica41(2):226– 233 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ahmad, S. S and Yaacob, A.W. (2015).Termites from Selected Building Premises in Selangor Peninsular Malaysia. Malaysian Forester 60: 203 – 215. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Alamu, O.T. Ewete, F.K., and Jimoh, S.O. (2018). Occurrence and diversity of termite species in Eucalyptus plantations in Afaka, Kaduna state, Nigeria. Journal of Research in Forestry, Wildlife and Environment 10: 33–38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Anantharaju T., Kaur G., Gajalakshmi S., Abbasi S.A. (2019): Sampling and identification of termites in Northeastern Puducherry. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2: 225–230. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bignell, D. E. (2010). Introduction to symbiosis.In:Termites: Evolution, Sociality and Ecology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 189 – 208pp. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bignell, D. E., & Eggleton, P. (2011). Termites in ecosystems. In T. Abe, D. E. Bignell, &H. Higashi (Eds.), Termites: Evolution, sociality, symbiosis, ecology (pp. 363–387). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bignell, D. E., Roisin, Y., & Lo, N. (2011).Biology of termites: A modern synthesis (p. 576). Dordrecht: Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Chouvenc, T., Su, N.-Y., 2010.Apparent synergy among defense mechanisms insubterranean termites (Rhinotermitidae) against epizootic events – The limitsand potential for biological control. Journal of Economic Entomology 103,1327–1337 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Culliney, T.W., Grace, J.K., (2010). Prospects for the biological control of subterraneantermites (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae), with special reference to Coptotermesformosanus. Bulletin of Entomological Research 90, 9–21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Davies AB, Berndt JV, Rensburg, Eggleton P, Parr CL (2012). Assessing the efficiency of termite sampling methods in southern African savannas. Journal of insect conservation University of Van Pretoria 76-77 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Davis, P. (2019). "Termite Identification". Entomology at Western Australian Department of Agriculture.Archived from the original on 2009-06-12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Dawes, T.Z., 2010. Reestablishment of ecological functioning by mulching and termite invasion in a degraded soil in an Australian savanna. Soil Biol. Biochem., 42: 1825-1834. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Dean, S., & Gold, R. (2014). Sex ratios and development of the reproductive system in castesofReticulitermes flavipes (Kollar) (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 97, 147–152. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Donovan, S.E., P. Eggleton, W.E. Dubbin, M.Batchelder and L. Dibong, (2011). The effect of asoil-feeding termite, Cubitermesfungifaber(Isoptera: Termitidae) on soil properties: Termitesmay be an important source of soil microhabitatheterogeneity in tropical forests. Pedobiologia, 45:1-11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Edwards, R. and Mill, A.E. (2011).Termites in Buildings.Their Biology and Control.Rentokil Ltd., West Sussex, U.K. 54 – 67pp. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Eggleton, P. (2017). Biological Letters, June 7, cited in Science News Vol. 171, p. 318. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Engel, M.S. and Krishna, K. (2014).“Family-group names for Termites (Isoptera)”. American Museum Novitates 3432: 1-9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Fei, H. & Henderson, G. (2014) Effects of temperature, directionalaspects, light conditions, and termite species on subterranean termiteactivity (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). Environmental Entomology, 33,242–248. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Forschler, B. T. (1999a). Biology of subterranean termites of the genus Reticulitermes. Part II, pp. 31-50. In National pest control association research report on subterranean termites. National Pest Control Association Publications.DunanLoring, VA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Forschler, B. T. and Jenkins, T. M. (2000). Subterranean Termites in the Urban Landscape: Understanding their social structure is the key to successfully implementing population management using bait technology. Urban Ecosystems 4: 231 – 251pp. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Ghaly, A.; and Edwards, S. (2011). Termite damage to buildings: Nature of attacks and preventive construction methods.Ame. Journal of England and Applied Sciences, 4, 187–200. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Grace, J.K., 2003. Approaches to biological control of termites. Sociobiology 41, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Grace, J.K., Ewart, D.M., 1996. Recombinant cells of Pseudomonas fluorescens: ahighly palatable encapsulation for delivery of genetically engineered toxins tosubterranean termites (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). Letters in Applied Microbiology 23, 183–186. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Grimaldi, D. and Engel, M.S. (2015).Evolution of the Insects.Cambridge University Press. 145pp. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Hamilton, C. and Bulmer, M.S. (2012) Molecular antifungal defensesin subterranean termites: RNA interference reveals in vivo rolesoftermicins and GNBPs against a naturally encountered pathogen.Developmental and Comparative Immunology, 36, 372–377. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Hemachandra J, Edirisinghe P, Karunaratne WAIP, Gunatilleke CVS (2010). Distinctiveness of termite assemblages in two Fragmented Forest types in Hantane hills in the Kandy district of Sri Lanka. Ceylon Journal of Science (Biological Sciences); 39(1):11-19 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Hinze, B., Crailsheim, K., &Leuthold, R. H. (2012).Polyethism in food processing and socialorganization in the nest of Macrotermesbellicosus(Isoptera, Termitidae). Insectes Sociaux,49, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. I.L. Ackerman, W.G. Teixeira, S.J. Riha, J. Lehmann, E.C.M. Fernandes, The impact of mound-building termites on surface soil properties in a secondary forest of Central Amazonia, Appl. Soil Ecol. 37 (2007) 267e276. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Imamura, Y., &Fujii, Y. (1995). Analysis of feeding activities of termites by AE monitoring ofinfested wood (in Japanese). Wood Preservation, 21, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Inward, D. J. G., Vogler, A. P., &Eggleton, P. (2007a). A comprehensive phylogenetic analysisof termites (Isoptera) illuminates key aspects of their evolutionary biology. MolecularPhylogenetics and Evolution, 44, 953–967. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. J.A. Holt, M. Lepage, Termites and soil properties. in: T. Abe, D.E. Bignell,M. Higashi (Eds.), Termites: Evolution, Sociality, Symbioses, Ecology. KluwerAcademic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2000, pp. 389e407. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Jones, S.C. and Nutting, W. L. (2009).Foraging Ecology of Subterranean Termites in the Sonoran Desert. In: Special Biotic Relationships in the Arid Southwest. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, N.M. 79 – 106pp. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Kemabonta, K.A., and Balogun, S.A. (2022): Species richness, diversity and relative abundance of termites (Insecta: Isoptera) in the University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria. FUTA Journal of Research in Sciences 2: 188–197. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Korb, J. and K. Hartfelder, (2018). Life history and development-a framework for understanding developmental plasticity in lower termites. Biol.Rev., 83: 295-313. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00044.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Lee, C. Y. (2012). Subterranean Termite Pest and their Control in the Urban Environment in Malaysia. Sociobiology 40: 3 – 9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Lee, K. E. and Wood, T. G. (2010).Termites and Soils.CABI Publishing. New York, N.Y. Pp. 1-24, 65-71. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Light, S. F. (1994).The Damp- Wood Termite, Paraneotermitessimplicicornis. In: Termites and Termite Control. University of California Press, Berkeley, C. A. 311 – 313pp. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Myles, T. G. (2015). Termite biology, urban entomology programme. Online at http://www.utoronto.ca/forest/termite/termite.htm [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Nakayama, T., Yoshimura, T., & Imamura, Y. (2005).Feeding activities of CoptotermesformosanusShiraki and Reticulitermessperatus(Kolbe) as affected by moisture content of wood.Journal of Wood Science, 51, 60–65. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Nalepa, C. A., and C. Bandi. (2010). Characterizing the ancestors: paedomorphosis and termite evolution, pp. 53-76. In T. Abe, D.E. Brignell, and M. Higashi [eds.]. Termites: evolution, sociality, symbiosis, ecology.Kluwer Academic Pub. Dordrecht, The Netherlands. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Neoh, K.B.; Lee, C.Y. (2011). "Developmental stages and caste composition of a mature and incipient colony of the drywood termite, Cryptotermesdudleyi (Isoptera: Kalotermitidae)". Journal of Economic Entomology. 104 (2): 622–8. doi:10.1603/ec10346. PMID 21510214. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Noirot, C. (2010). Formation of Castes in the Higher Termites. In: Biology of Termites. Vol. 1.Academic Press, New York, N. Y. 311 – 350pp. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Noirot, C. and J.P.E.C. Darlington. 2000. Termite Nests: Architecture, Regulation and Defence, pp.121-139. In: T. Abe, D.E. Bignell and M. Higsahi, eds., Termites: Evolution, Sociality, Symbioses, and Ecology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Ohiagu, C.E. (1999). Nest and Soil population of Trinervitermes Spp. with particular References to Trinervitermesgerminatus (Wasmann) Isoptera in Southern Guinea Savanna, near Mokwa, Nigeria. Ecologia40 : 167-178. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Ohtoko, K., M. Ohkuma, S. Moriya, T. Inoue, R. Usami, and T. Kudo. 2000. Diverse genes of cellulase homologues of glycosyl hydrolase family 45 from the symbiotic protists in the hindgut of the termite Reticulitermessperatus. Extremophiles 4: 343-349. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Omkar, & Pervez, A. (2002). Influence of temperature on age specific fecundity of a ladybeetle,Micraspis discolor(Fabricius). International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, 22, 61–65. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Omkar, & Pervez, A. (2004).Temperature dependent development and immature survival of an aphidophagous ladybeetle, Propyleadissecta(Mulsant).Journal of Applied Entomology, 128, 510–514. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Paul, B. B. and Rueben, J. M. (2013).Arizona Termites of Economic importance. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ. 9 – 17pp. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Pawson, B. M., and R. E. Gold. 1996. Caste differentiation and reproductive dynamics of the three subterranean termites in the genus Reticulitermes (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). Sociobiology 28: 241-251. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Pearce, M. J. (1997). Termites: Biology and Pest management. CABI Publishing. New York, N.Y. 86 – 92pp. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Piper, R. (2007). Extraordinary Animals: An Encyclopedia of Curious and Unusual animals. Greenwood Press. 125pp. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles