Parametric Sensitivity Analysis of Ship Maneuvring Performance Using Planar Motion Mechanism-Based Hydrodynamic Modelling
Authors
Department of Marine & Offshore Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Rivers State University, Port-Harcourt (Nigeria)
Department of Marine & Offshore Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Rivers State University, Port-Harcourt (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.11030043
Subject Category: Engineering
Volume/Issue: 11/3 | Page No: 447-458
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-03-18
Accepted: 2026-03-24
Published: 2026-04-04
Abstract
This study presents a parametric sensitivity analysis of ship manoeuvring performance using Planar Motion Mechanism (PMM)-derived hydrodynamic coefficients. A three-degree-of-freedom horizontal-plane model was developed to compute turning radius, tactical diameter, advance, sway velocity, yaw rate, and hydrodynamic forces. Systematic variations in vessel length (50–300 m), PMM oscillation amplitude (0.1–2 m), oscillation frequency (0.01–0.2 Hz), and forward speed (2–18 m/s) were implemented to evaluate their influence on manoeuvring metrics. Results indicate that turning radius and tactical diameter scale proportionally with vessel length, while sway forces and yaw moments increase with oscillation amplitude, frequency, and forward speed. The study provides quantitative relationships and engineering insights, facilitating improved PMM experiment design, accurate manoeuvring prediction, and optimisation of ship handling characteristics for both preliminary design and operational assessment.
Keywords
Ship manoeuvring; Planar Motion Mechanism
Downloads
References
1. Ardeshiri, S., Mousavizadegan, H., & Kheradmand, S. (2020). Virtual Simulation of PMM Tests Independent of Test Parameters. Brodogradnja, 71(2), 55–73. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Balagopalan, A., Tiwari, K., Rameesha, T. V., & Krishnankutty, P. (2020). Manoeuvring prediction of a container ship using the numerical PMM test and experimental validation using the free running model test. Ships and Offshore Structures, 15(8), 852–865. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2019.1688921 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Bozzo, S., Villa, D., & Mancini, S. (2025). Analyses of Different Approaches for Virtual Towing Tank Uncertainty Assessment. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 13(10), 1882. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Chame, M. E. F., de Mello, P. C., & Tannuri, E. A. (2025). Novel Method for Predicting Linear Velocity Derivative in Modern Ship Hulls and Its Validation Using a Low-Speed Maneuvering Simulator. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 13(12), 2399. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Choi, J., Kim, Y., Zhu, Z., & Wang, S. (2024). Numerical PMM test in finite depth. Ocean Engineering, 314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.119690 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Guo, R., Zan, Y., Luo, X., Ma, X., Xu, T., Han, D., Li, D., & Bai, X. (2024). Evaluation of hydrodynamic coefficients and sensitivity analysis of a work-class remotely operated vehicle using planar motion mechanism tests. Ocean Engineering, 312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.119037 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Jiang, L., Yao, J., & Liu, Z. (2025). Analysis of the Accuracy of a Body-Force Propeller Model and a Discretized Propeller Model in RANS Simulations of the Flow Around a Maneuvering Ship. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 13(4), 788. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Jing Liu, K. H. C., Bhushan Taskar, Daniel Liu, Alan R. Magee. (2023). Virtual PMM captive tests using OpenFOAM to estimate hydrodynamic derivatives and vessel maneuverability. Ocean Engineering, 286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115654 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Liu, J., Chua, K. H., Taskar, B., Liu, D., & Magee, A. R. (2023). Virtual PMM captive tests using OpenFOAM to estimate hydrodynamic derivatives and vessel maneuverability. Ocean Engineering, 286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115654 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Maljković, M., Pavić, I., Meštrović, T., & Perkovič, M. (2024). Ship Maneuvering in Shallow and Narrow Waters: Predictive Methods and Model Development Review. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 12(8), 1450. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Miller, L. M., & Brizzolara, S. (2023). Effect of amplitudes and frequencies on Virtual Planar Motion Mechanism of AUVs, Part I: Forces, moments and hydrodynamic derivatives. Ocean Engineering, 286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115512 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Moreira, L. (2026). Models and Simulations of Ship Manoeuvring. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 14(5), 426. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Pires da Silva, P., Sutulo, S., & Guedes Soares, C. (2023). Sensitivity Analysis of Ship Manoeuvring Mathematical Models. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 11(2), 416. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Sarah, U. T., S. M. Ashikuzzaman Emon, & Akib, M. M. H. (2025). Advancing Ship Maneuvering Simulations with Mathematical Models for Sustainable Development of Shipping Industry. Proceedings of the 5th NSRIC International Conference on Sustainable Economy, Commerce and Management (ICSECM 12-2024), Canada. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Tadros, M., Aung, M. Z., Louvros, P., Pollalis, C., Nazemian, A., & Boulougouris, E. (2025). Ship Manoeuvring Research 2010–2025: From Hydrodynamics and Control to Digital Twins, AI and MASS. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 13(12), 2322. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Tamunodukobipi, D., & Nitonye, S. (2019). Numerical Analysis of the RAP Characteristics of a Catamaran Vessel for Niger Delta Pliability. Journal of Power and Energy Engineering, 7(10), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.4236/jpee.2019.710001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Tian, K., Wen, Y., Zhu, M., Lei, T., Wang, S., & Huang, Y. (2025). Hybrid modeling and online prediction of 4-DOF ship maneuvering motion in disturbed waters. Ocean Engineering. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Udo, E. A., & Tamunodukobipi, D. (2022). Preliminary Design Analysis of RoPax for Nigeria Coastal Water Pliability. Engineering, 14, 441–462. https://doi.org/10.4236/eng.2022.1410034 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Wang, H.-J., Duan, W.-Y., Chen, J.-K., Shao, W.-B., & Wang, H.-X. (2024). Numerical analysis of a tanker maneuvering linear hydrodynamic derivative in steep waves. Ocean Engineering, 311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118929 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Yu, Q., Yang, Y., Geng, X., Jiang, Y., Li, Y., & Tang, Y. (2024). Integrating Computational Fluid Dynamics for Maneuverability Prediction in Dual Full Rotary Propulsion Ships: A 4-DOF Mathematical Model Approach. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 12(5), 762. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- An Adaptive Joint Filtering Approach to Wireless Relay Network for Transmission Rate Maximization
- IoT-Integrated Mercury Substance Detection System for Cosmetic Product Safety
- Design and Implementation of Solar PV-Based Railway Microgrid for Linke Hofmann Busch Coaches
- Cost Control Techniques on Civil Engineering Projects in Oyo State, Nigeria
- Strength and Predictive Modeling of Corn Cob Ash Blended Concrete Using Multi-Output Artificial Neural Network Approach