Parametric Survival Analysis of Neonatal Mortality in a Tertiary Care Setting: A Comparative Proportional Hazard Model Approach
Authors
University of Lucknow, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India (India)
University of Lucknow, Luckow, Uttar Pradesh, India (India)
Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences (RMLIMS), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India (India)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.110200150
Subject Category: Social science
Volume/Issue: 11/2 | Page No: 1611-1624
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-03-04
Accepted: 2026-03-09
Published: 2026-03-21
Abstract
Background: Neonatal mortality represents a major public health concern characterised by complex survival dynamics and substantial aetiological heterogeneity. Appropriate survival modelling of time-to-event data is essential for elucidating disease-specific risk profile during the critical first 28 days of life. Neonatal mortality in intensive care settings exhibits an early-peak hazard profile inadequately captured by semiparametric methods alone. Comparative evaluation of parametric proportional hazard (PH) models that explicitly parameterise the baseline hazard provides both superior fit diagnostics and direct hazard quantification.
Objectives: To compare parametric survival models and identify the optimal distributional fit for neonatal mortality data, and to determine prognostic factors using the best-fitted model for neonatal outcome.
Methods: A prospective study design was used to collected the data of 686 neonates admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) and Special Newborn Care Unit (SNCU) at Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences (RMLIMS), Lucknow, was followed from admission until death, discharge, transfer, or day 28. Four survival models were fitted and compared by Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). The proportional hazards (PH) assumption was assessed via Schoenfeld residuals with global test. Discriminative ability was evaluated using Harrell's C-concordance statistic
Results: Among 686 neonates, 155 (22.59%) died during follow-up. The Weibull PH model achieved the best fit (AIC = 827.77; BIC = 927.44). Key independent predictors included extreme prematurity, congenital malformations, perinatal asphyxia, neonatal sepsis, induced labour, and multiparity. The global Schoenfeld test supported the proportional hazards assumption (p = 0.0976). Harrell's C = 0.7948 indicated good discriminative performance.
Conclusions: The Weibull PH model provides the best parametric characterisation of neonatal mortality hazard dynamics. Extreme prematurity, critical clinical diagnoses, and induced labour are dominant independent hazard determinants, consistent across all model specifications.
Keywords
neonatal mortality; Weibull; Gompertz
Downloads
References
1. Liu, L., Oza, S., Hogan, D., Chu, Y., Perin, J., Zhu, J., Lawn, J. E., Cousens, S., Mathers, C., & Black, R. E. (2016). Global, regional, and national causes of under-5 mortality in 2000-15: an updated systematic analysis with implications for the Sustainable Development Goals. The Lancet, 388(10063), 3027-3035. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31593-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Levels & Trends in Child Mortality. Report 2022, Estimates developed by the United Nations Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation. 2023. Accessed February 2024. https://childmortality.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/UN-IGME-Child-Mortality-Report-2022.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ICF. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5), 2019-21: India. Mumbai: IIPS; 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Sankar, M. J., Neogi, S. B., Sharma, J., Chauhan, M., Srivastava, R., Prabhakar, P. K., Khera, A., Kumar, R., Zodpey, S., & Paul, V. K. (2016). State of newborn health in India. Journal of Perinatology, 36(S3), S3-S8. https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2016.183 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Ukkali, S. B., Kulkarni, N., Badsheshi, P., Naganoor, R., & Thobbi, A. (2023). Risk factors and trends in neonatal mortality in NICU in a tertiary care hospital in India. Indian Journal of Child Health, 10(1), 10-13. https://doi.org/10.32677/ijch.v10i1.3830 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Murthy K, Porta NFM, Steinhorn RH. Neonatal outcomes in resource-limited settings. Pediatrics. 2011;128(6):e1677-e1679. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Lawn, J. E., Cousens, S., & Zupan, J. (2005). 4 million neonatal deaths: When? Where? Why? The Lancet, 365(9462), 891-900. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(05)71048-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Thakur N, Das RR, Roy MP. Predictors of neonatal mortality in a NICU of a tertiary care hospital in India. Indian J Child Health. 2018;5(7):482-485. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Sharpe JN, Salameh P, Haddad A. Survival analysis methods in neonatal research: a systematic review. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2017;31(6):529-538. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Collett, D. (2015). Modelling survival data in medical research. https://doi.org/10.1201/b18041 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and Life-Tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology), 34(2), 187-202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Kalbfleisch, J. D., & Prentice, R. L. (2002). The statistical analysis of failure time data (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Cox, C., Chu, H., Schneider, M. F., & Muñoz, A. (2007). Parametric survival analysis and taxonomy of hazard functions for the generalized gamma distribution. Statistics in Medicine, 26(23), 4352-4374. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2836 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Gompertz, B. (1825). On the Nature of the Function Expressive of the Law of Human Mortality, and on a New Mode of Determining the Value of Life Contingencies. In Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (Vol. 115, pp. 513-583). Royal Society. https://www.jstor.org/stable/107756 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Makeham, W. M. & Church of England Assurance Institution. (1860). On the Law of Mortality and the Construction of Annuity Tables. In THE ASSURANCE MAGAZINE, AND JOURNAL OF THE INSTITUTE OF ACTUARIES (pp. 302-304). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Harrell, F. E., Jr, Lee, K. L., & Mark, D. B. (1996). Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Statistics in medicine, 15(4), 361-387. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960229)15:4<361::AID-SIM168>3.0.CO;2-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2004). Multimodel inference. Sociological Methods & Research, 33(2), 261-304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124104268644 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Adebayo, S. B., & Fahrmeir, L. (2005). Analysing child mortality in Nigeria with geoadditive discrete‐time survival models. Statistics in Medicine, 24(5), 709-728. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1842 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Kebede E, Tesfaye G, Negesse T. Parametric survival models for the determinants of neonatal mortality in Ethiopia: evidence from EDHS 2016. BMC Pediatrics. 2021;21(1):278. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Sweet, D. G., Carnielli, V. P., Greisen, G., Hallman, M., Klebermass-Schrehof, K., Ozek, E., Pas, A. T., Plavka, R., Roehr, C. C., Saugstad, O. D., Simeoni, U., Speer, C. P., Vento, M., Visser, G. H., & Halliday, H. L. (2023). European Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome: 2022 update. Neonatology, 120(1), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1159/000528914 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Hartman, R. J., Rasmussen, S. A., Botto, L. D., Riehle-Colarusso, T., Martin, C. L., Cragan, J. D., Shin, M., & Correa, A. (2011). The contribution of chromosomal abnormalities to congenital heart defects: A Population-Based study. Pediatric Cardiology, 32(8), 1147-1157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-011-0034-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Shankaran, S., Laptook, A. R., Ehrenkranz, R. A., Tyson, J. E., McDonald, S. A., Donovan, E. F., Fanaroff, A. A., Poole, W. K., Wright, L. L., Higgins, R. D., Finer, N. N., Carlo, W. A., Duara, S., Oh, W., Cotten, C. M., Stevenson, D. K., Stoll, B. J., Lemons, J. A., Guillet, R., & Jobe, A. H. (2005). Whole-Body Hypothermia for Neonates with Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy. New England Journal of Medicine, 353(15), 1574-1584. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmcps050929 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Fleischmann-Struzek, C., Goldfarb, D. M., Schlattmann, P., Schlapbach, L. J., Reinhart, K., & Kissoon, N. (2018). The global burden of paediatric and neonatal sepsis: a systematic review. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 6(3), 223-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-2600(18)30063-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Caughey, A. B., Sundaram, V., Kaimal, A. J., Cheng, Y. W., Gienger, A., Little, S. E., Lee, J. F., Wong, L., Shaffer, B. L., Tran, S. H., Padula, A., McDonald, K. M., Long, E. F., Owens, D. K., & Bravata, D. M. (2009). Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor. Evidence report/technology assessment, (176), 1-257. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Kozuki, N., Lee, A. C., Silveira, M. F., Sania, A., Vogel, J. P., Adair, L., Barros, F., Caulfield, L. E., Christian, P., Fawzi, W., Humphrey, J., Huybregts, L., Mongkolchati, A., Ntozini, R., Osrin, D., Roberfroid, D., Tielsch, J., Vaidya, A., Black, R. E., . . . Group, C. H. E. R. G. S. B. W. (2013). The associations of parity and maternal age with small-for-gestational-age, preterm, and neonatal and infant mortality: a meta-analysis. BMC Public Health, 13(S3), S2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-s3-s2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Dorling, J. S., Field, D. J., & Manktelow, B. (2004). Neonatal disease severity scoring systems. Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal, 90(1), F11-F16. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2003.048488 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Kayode GA, Grobbee DE, Amoakoh-Coleman M, et al. Parametric versus semi-parametric models for child mortality analysis. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18(1):123. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Grambsch, P. M., & Therneau, T. M. (1994). Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals. Biometrika, 81(3), 515-526. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/81.3.515 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Stoll, B. J., Hansen, N. I., Bell, E. F., Shankaran, S., Laptook, A. R., Walsh, M. C., Hale, E. C., Newman, N. S., Schibler, K., Carlo, W. A., Kennedy, K. A., Poindexter, B. B., Finer, N. N., Ehrenkranz, R. A., Duara, S., Sánchez, P. J., O’Shea, T. M., Goldberg, R. N., Van Meurs, K. P., . . . Higgins, R. D. (2010). Neonatal outcomes of extremely preterm infants from the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. PEDIATRICS, 126(3), 443-456. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-2959 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Crowther MJ, Lambert PC. A general framework for parametric survival analysis. Stat Med. 2014;33(22):3871-3888. doi:10.1002/sim.6206 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Kay R. Proportional hazard regression models and the analysis of censored survival data. J R Stat Soc Ser C. 1977;26(3):227-237. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. StataCorp (2013). Stata Statistical Software: Release 13.1. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
- Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
- Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
- The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
- Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar