Perceived Teaching Performance and Inquiry-Based Teaching Strategies as Predictors of Science Identity among Senior High School Learners

Authors

Ruel Suarez Larutin

Holy Cross of Davao College (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51584/IJRIAS.2026.11070100

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 11/7 | Page No: 1448-1459

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-22

Accepted: 2026-07-27

Published: 2026-08-05

Abstract

A weak science learning identity among Grade 12 STEM students remains a challenge in science education. This study utilized a descriptive-diagnostic research design and adapted survey questionnaires to examine how perceived teaching performance and inquiry-based teaching strategies influence the science identity of 230 respondents. Multiple regression analysis revealed that perceived teaching performance significantly predicts science learning identity, highlighting the vital role of effective instruction, teacher support, and positive learning experiences. Conversely, inquiry-based teaching strategies did not yield a statistically significant direct influence. Consequently, the study recommends enhancing pedagogical practices, integrating structured classroom scaffolding, and establishing meaningful recognition for students to effectively strengthen learners' science identities.

Keywords

Perceived teaching performance, inquiry-based teaching strategies, predictors of science learning identity, senior high school

Downloads

References

1. Bangga, L. A. (2021). Science self-efficacy, engagement, and academic performance among senior high school students. Philippine Social Science Journal, 4(3), 74–83. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187-1218. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Chan, Yuen Fook & Sidhu, Gurnam & Narasuman, Suthagar & Lee, L.F.. (2016). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chen, S., & Wei, B. (2022). Development and validation of an instrument to measure high school students' science identity in science learning. Research in Science Education, 52(1), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09935-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cian, H., Dou, R., & Marshall, J. C. (2021). Developing science identity through participation in authentic science practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(9), 1342–1368. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (4th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. DepEd Order No. 42, s. 2017. National Adoption and Implementation of the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/DO_s2017_042-1.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Dou, R., & Cian, H. (2022). How high school science experiences shape science identity development. Research in Science Education, 52(2), 389-408. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Dou, R., & Cian, H. (2022). Science identity and its role in promoting equity in STEM education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(8), 1248–1272. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Gepila, E. C., Jr. (2020). Assessing Teachers Using Philippine Standards for Teachers. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 739–746. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080302 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Gholam, A. (2019). Inquiry-based learning: Student teachers' challenges and perceptions. Journal of Inquiry & Action in Education, 10(2), 112–133. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hazari, Z., Potvin, G., Lock, R. M., & Cribbs, J. D. (2020). The importance of high school physics teachers in developing students' science identity. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(1), 010117. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Shanahan, M. C. (2022). Connecting high school science experiences to science identity development and STEM career aspirations. Science Education, 106(4), 897–921.https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080302 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Huang, L., et al. (2024). Exploring the impact of web-based inquiry on elementary students' science identity. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, Article 1085. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03299-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Jiang, Z., & Wei, B. (2023). Understanding science identity development among college students: A systematic literature review. Science & Education, 32(6), 1797–1824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-023-00478-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Lee, G. G. (2023). From science motivation to science identity: The mediating effect of science achievement according to gender differences. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(10), Article em2341. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13633 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Liou, P.-Y., & Myoung, E. (2023). Teacher-perceived science inquiry-based instructional practice on student achievement and motivational beliefs in classroom contexts. Science Education, 107(6), 1485–1506. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21812 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Lucas, K. B., & Spina, C. J. (2022). The role of recognition and belonging in science identity development among secondary students. International Journal of Science Education, 44(11), 1732–1751. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. McCartney, M., Wieselmann, J. R., & Kang, H. (2022). Examining science identity development in K–12 science education: A systematic review. Science Education, 106(6), 1414–1443. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Relationship of inquiry-based instruction on active learning in higher education. 24. 55-72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Stronge, J. H. (2018). Qualities of effective teachers (3rd ed.). ASCD. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Taconis, R., van der Sanden, M., & de Vries, G. (2023). Challenge-based learning as authentic learning for STEM identity development. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1144702. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1144702 Teachers. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 739–746. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. United Nations. (2023). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. United Nations. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2023/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Vincent-Ruz, P., & Schunn, C. D. (2018). The nature of science identity and its role as the driver of student choices. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Vincent-Ruz, P., & Schunn, C. D. (2020). The nature of science identity and its role as the driver of student choices. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(48), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00234-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Zhai, Y., et al. (2024). Science teacher identity research: A scoping literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 11, Article 54. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Zhai, Y., Tripp, J., & Liu, X. (2024). Science teacher identity research: A scoping literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 11, Article 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00481-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles