Plasma-Modified Collagen Nanofibers for Accelerated Wound Healing: A Genetic and Epigenetic Framework for Precision Tissue Regeneration

Chronic and non-healing wounds represent a growing clinical and economic burden worldwide, and conventional scaffolds still largely fail to actively instruct the cellular programs required for organized dermal regeneration. This integrative narrative review synthesizes evidence from plasma physics, collagen bioscience, cell biology, and epigenomics into a mechanism-oriented framework for next-generation wound-care matrices, with explicit and sustained attention to the strength of the underlying evidence. To make the basis of the synthesis transparent, the literature was identified through structured searches of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Web of Science Core Collection (January 2000–December 2025), and each principal mechanistic claim is graded according to whether it is directly demonstrated in plasma-treated collagen systems (Tier A), well established in an adjacent context and extrapolated by analogy (Tier B), or advanced as a testable hypothesis awaiting validation (Tier C).
We examine how cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) treatment of electrospun type I collagen nanofibers remodels surface chemistry, mechanical integrity, and biological signaling. Drawing on surface science, proteomics, transcriptomics, and epigenomics, we describe how reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS) covalently modify collagen side chains, introduce polar functional groups, increase nanoscale roughness, and reorganize fibril packing—effects that are, for the most part, directly measurable and therefore well supported. These physicochemical changes are associated with enhanced adhesion, proliferation, and directional migration of keratinocytes, dermal fibroblasts, and endothelial progenitor cells, and with upregulation of extracellular-matrix (ECM) biosynthetic genes—including COL1A1, COL3A1, FN1, and VEGFA—through integrin–FAK/ILK, Rho/ROCK, YAP/TAZ, and TGF-β/SMAD signaling.
We argue that epigenetic reprogramming—context-specific DNA-methylation changes, histone-modification remodeling, and non-coding RNA networks—represents a plausible but as-yet incompletely validated intermediary that may convert transient biophysical cues into durable transcriptional states. We deliberately distinguish this proposal, which remains largely at the level of extrapolation and hypothesis, from the better-established physicochemical and short-term cellular effects, and we set out the loss-of-function, durability, and dose–response experiments required to test it. Preclinical studies in murine, diabetic-rat, and porcine models report accelerated re-epithelialization, enhanced vascularization, and improved collagen remodeling relative to unmodified controls, although heterogeneity in plasma dosimetry and outcome reporting currently precludes quantitative pooling. We further address plasma-dose standardization, scaffold-design hierarchy, long-term biocompatibility, batch reproducibility, safety evaluation, and regulatory classification as prerequisites for clinical translation. The framework presented here is intended not as a settled account but as a rational, evidence-graded roadmap for the epigenetically informed design of plasma-functionalized collagen scaffolds.

Cold Atmospheric Plasma; Collagen Nanofibers; Wound Healing; Epigenetic Reprogramming

1. Gurtner GC, Werner S, Barrandon Y, Longaker MT. Wound repair and regeneration. Nature. 2008;453(7193):314–321. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07039 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Sen CK, Gordillo GM, Roy S, et al. Human skin wounds: a major and snowballing threat to public health and the economy. Wound Repair Regen. 2009;17(6):763–771. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-475X.2009.00543.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Dhandayuthapani B, Yoshida Y, Maekawa T, Kumar DS. Polymeric scaffolds in tissue engineering application: a review. Int J Polym Sci. 2011;2011:290602. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/290602 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Kadler KE, Baldock C, Bella J, Boot-Handford RP. Collagens at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2007;120(Pt 12):1955–1958. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.03453 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Dong C, Lv Y. Application of collagen scaffold in tissue engineering: recent advances and new perspectives. Polymers (Basel). 2016;8(2):42. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym8020042 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Fridman G, Friedman G, Gutsol A, Shekhter AB, Vasilets VN, Fridman A. Applied plasma medicine. Plasma Process Polym. 2008;5(6):503–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppap.200700154 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Weltmann KD, Kindel E, Brandenburg R, et al. Atmospheric-pressure plasma jet for medical therapy: plasma parameters and risk estimation. Contrib Plasma Phys. 2009;49(9):631–640. https://doi.org/10.1002/ctpp.200910078 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Haertel B, von Woedtke T, Weltmann KD, Lindequist U. Non-thermal atmospheric-pressure plasma possible application in wound healing. Biomol Ther (Seoul). 2014;22(6):477–490. https://doi.org/10.4062/biomolther.2014.105 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Shoulders MD, Raines RT. Collagen structure and stability. Annu Rev Biochem. 2009;78:929–958. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.032207.120833 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Myllyharju J, Kivirikko KI. Collagens, modifying enzymes and their mutations in humans, flies and worms. Trends Genet. 2004;20(1):33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2003.11.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Sorrell JM, Caplan AI. Fibroblast heterogeneity: more than skin deep. J Cell Sci. 2004;117(Pt 5):667–675. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.01005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Agarwal S, Wendorff JH, Greiner A. Use of electrospinning technique for biomedical applications. Polymer (Guildf). 2008;49(26):5603–5621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2008.09.014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Zeugolis DI, Khew ST, Yew ES, et al. Electro-spinning of pure collagen nano-fibres: just an expensive way to make gelatin? Biomaterials. 2008;29(15):2293–2305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.02.009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Olde Damink LH, Dijkstra PJ, Van Luyn MJ, Van Wachem PB, Nieuwenhuis P, Feijen J. Cross-linking of dermal sheep collagen using a water-soluble carbodiimide. Biomaterials. 1996;17(8):765–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(96)81413-X [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Isbary G, Morfill G, Schmidt HU, et al. A first prospective randomized controlled trial to decrease bacterial load using cold atmospheric argon plasma on chronic wounds in patients. Br J Dermatol. 2010;163(1):78–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.09744.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Graves DB. The emerging role of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species in redox biology and some implications for plasma applications to medicine and biology. J Phys D Appl Phys. 2012;45(26):263001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/45/26/263001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Graves DB. Reactive species from cold atmospheric plasma: implications for cancer therapy. Plasma Process Polym. 2014;11(12):1120–1127. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppap.201400068 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Arndt S, Unger P, Wacker E, et al. Cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) changes gene expression of key molecules of the wound-healing machinery and improves wound healing in vitro and in vivo. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e79325. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079325 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Denes FS, Manolache S. Macromolecular plasma-chemistry: an emerging field of polymer science. Prog Polym Sci. 2004;29(8):815–885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2004.05.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Dalby MJ, Gadegaard N, Oreffo RO. Harnessing nanotopography and integrin–matrix interactions to influence stem-cell fate. Nat Mater. 2014;13(6):558–569. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3980 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Supp DM, Boyce ST. Engineered skin substitutes: practices and potentials. Clin Dermatol. 2005;23(4):403–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2004.07.023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Hinz B. Formation and function of the myofibroblast during tissue repair. J Invest Dermatol. 2007;127(3):526–537. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jid.5700613 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Mirpour S, Fathollah S, Mansouri P, et al. Cold atmospheric plasma as an effective method to treat diabetic foot ulcers: a randomized clinical trial. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):10440. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67232-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Hamdan S, Pastar I, Drakulich S, et al. Nanotechnology-driven therapeutic interventions in wound healing: potential uses and applications. ACS Cent Sci. 2017;3(3):163–175. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.6b00371 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Xue M, Jackson CJ. Extracellular matrix reorganization during wound healing and its impact on abnormal scarring. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2015;4(3):119–136. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2013.0485 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Dupont S, Morsut L, Aragona M, et al. Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction. Nature. 2011;474(7350):179–183. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10137 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Werner S, Grose R. Regulation of wound healing by growth factors and cytokines. Physiol Rev. 2003;83(3):835–870. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.2003.83.3.835 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Eming SA, Martin P, Tomic-Canic M. Wound repair and regeneration: mechanisms, signaling, and translation. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6(265):265sr6. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3009337 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Deryugina EI, Quigley JP. Matrix metalloproteinases and tumor metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2006;25(1):9–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10555-006-7886-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Tajik A, Zhang Y, Wei F, et al. Transcription upregulation via force-induced direct stretching of chromatin. Nat Mater. 2016;15(12):1287–1296. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4729 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Bannister AJ, Kouzarides T. Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications. Cell Res. 2011;21(3):381–395. https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2011.22 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Zanconato F, Forcato M, Battilana G, et al. Genome-wide association between YAP/TAZ/TEAD and AP-1 at enhancers drives oncogenic growth. Nat Cell Biol. 2015;17(9):1218–1227. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb3216 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Bracken AP, Helin K. Polycomb group proteins: navigators of lineage pathways led astray in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9(11):773–784. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc2736 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Brem H, Tomic-Canic M. Cellular and molecular basis of wound healing in diabetes. J Clin Invest. 2007;117(5):1219–1222. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI32169 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Park LK, Maione AG, Smith A, et al. Genome-wide DNA-methylation analysis identifies a metabolic-memory profile in patient-derived diabetic foot-ulcer fibroblasts. Epigenetics. 2014;9(10):1339–1349. https://doi.org/10.4161/15592294.2014.967584 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Sullivan TP, Eaglstein WH, Davis SC, Mertz P. The pig as a model for human wound healing. Wound Repair Regen. 2001;9(2):66–76. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-475x.2001.00066.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Bhardwaj N, Kundu SC. Electrospinning: a fascinating fiber-fabrication technique. Biotechnol Adv. 2010;28(3):325–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.01.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Chen FM, Liu X. Advancing biomaterials of human origin for tissue engineering. Prog Polym Sci. 2016;53:86–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.02.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Oehnke SE, Svensson JA, Almqvist S, et al. Antimicrobial plasma treatment of collagen biomaterials reduces biofilm formation. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2017;11(4):1153–1163. https://doi.org/10.1002/term.2025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Taganov KD, Boldin MP, Chang KJ, Baltimore D. NF-κB-dependent induction of microRNA miR-146, an inhibitor targeted to signaling proteins of innate immune responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103(33):12481–12486. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0605298103 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Venugopal J, Low S, Choon AT, Ramakrishna S. Interaction of cells and nanofiber scaffolds in tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2008;84(1):34–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30841 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Loewer S, Cabili MN, Guttman M, et al. Large intergenic non-coding RNA-RoR modulates reprogramming of human induced pluripotent stem cells. Nat Genet. 2010;42(12):1113–1117. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.710 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Murphy SV, Atala A. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32(8):773–785. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2958 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Miroiu RI, Stefan-van Staden RI, Dinescu G. Regulatory considerations for advanced-therapy medicinal products in the European Union. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2022;110(4):729–739. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34950 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Shevchenko RV, James SL, James SE. A review of tissue-engineered skin bioconstructs available for skin reconstruction. J R Soc Interface. 2010;7(43):229–258. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2009.0403 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. von Woedtke T, Reuter S, Masur K, Weltmann KD. Plasmas for medicine. Phys Rep. 2013;530(4):291–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2013.05.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Jiang D, Rinkevich Y. Defining skin scarring and skin fibrosis as inherently distinct healing outcomes. EMBO Rep. 2020;21(8):e50033. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.202050033 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Vickovic S, Eraslan G, Salmen F, et al. High-definition spatial transcriptomics for in situ tissue profiling. Nat Methods. 2019;16(10):987–990. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0548-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Anzalone AV, Randolph PB, Davis JR, et al. Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature. 2019;576(7785):149–157. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1711-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Baethge C, Goldbeck-Wood S, Mertens S. SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2019;4:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-019-0064-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Murad MH, Asi N, Alsawas M, Alahdab F. New evidence pyramid. Evid Based Med. 2016;21(4):125–127. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmed-2016-110401 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Problem-Based Learning Strategy: Effect on Achievement of Genetics among Biology Students in Colleges of Education Oyo, Oyo State
• Gut Content Analysis of Siganus canaliculatus (Danggit)
• Predicting Human Neurotherapeutic Response through Preclinical Imaging Intelligence
• Can Algicidal Bacteria be the Solution to Successfully Manage Freshwater Algal Blooms?
• Boosting Carbon Capture: Progress in Enhancing RuBisCO’s Carboxylase Activity